• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN: leftwing rag

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,462
Reaction score
33,784
Location
Western Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
CNN.webp

Look at the Top 10 Stories, CNN is nothing but a leftwing rag like we've always said. 40% is outright anti-Trump plus the Tracking program story.
 
I still like watching CNN compared to either MSNBC or Fox; CNN has more of a centrist point of view the way I see it. Numerous times CNN would have on an important Liberal being raked over the coals just as much as I have see CNN do this to a Conservative.

And I have seen headlines on Fox.com cutting down Liberals as well as what the OP shows too. :shrug:
 
View attachment 67211478

Look at the Top 10 Stories, CNN is nothing but a leftwing rag like we've always said. 40% is outright anti-Trump plus the Tracking program story.

I only watch CNN once in a while. Bloomberg and BBC More regularly and CNBC for financial news. France 24 for French things and to balance ZDF/ARD. Together I find you get a relatively balanced view of things.

But most of my info comes in print.
 
View attachment 67211478

Look at the Top 10 Stories, CNN is nothing but a leftwing rag like we've always said. 40% is outright anti-Trump plus the Tracking program story.

Well, CNN, like CBS and most others are running a lot of political stories these days. So your assertion is really silly.
 
If you're watching it, it isn't news.
 
Look at the Top 10 Stories, CNN is nothing but a leftwing rag like we've always said. 40% is outright anti-Trump plus the Tracking program story.

Which of these stories are you considering "anti-Trump"?
 
Are you just an incapable human being or what? :roll:

Instead of barely disguising a personal attack in the form of a rhetorical question, why don't you just answer the question I asked, since it was on target.
You wrote the OP, after all.
 
Instead of barely disguising a personal attack in the form of a rhetorical question, why don't you just answer the question I asked, since it was on target.
You wrote the OP, after all.

Anyone with sense could look at the titles and figure out the answer. They don't need to ask like a six year old.
 
Anyone with sense could look at the titles and figure out the answer. They don't need to ask like a six year old.

So you can't even defend the premise of your OP.
Why do you even bother to post such nonsense? Are you just looking for validation?

What inadequacies do you carry around with you that you are incapable of answering a single simple question, without personal insult?
 
Anyone with sense could look at the titles and figure out the answer. They don't need to ask like a six year old.

He's not alone in noting your inability to defend your own premise.

ps. A rag nornally refers to a newspaper not electronic media.
 
He's not alone in noting your inability to defend your own premise.

ps. A rag nornally refers to a newspaper not electronic media.

I did. Most of the stories are anti-Trump. But you clearly ignored the OP where I stated it. Nothing unbiased about a site where 40-50% of the stories are negative about a Republican. Now tell me why a supposed unbiased site is doing that. A rag isn't electronic? Join the 21st century dude.
 
I did. Most of the stories are anti-Trump. But you clearly ignored the OP where I stated it. Nothing unbiased about a site where 40-50% of the stories are negative about a Republican. Now tell me why a supposed unbiased site is doing that. A rag isn't electronic? Join the 21st century dude.


This stupid game again?



If B is a generally bad thing, then stories about B will be generally negative. If a news report quotes Trump saying that he thinks an arms race would be just fine and notes that various persons expressed worry over the prospect, that isn't "bias." That's just a report about Trump being the loose cannon that he is.
 
They didn't give CNN the nick name of "The Clinton News Network" for nothing.
It was well earned, as we've seen, and as we continue to see.
 
I did. Most of the stories are anti-Trump. But you clearly ignored the OP where I stated it. Nothing unbiased about a site where 40-50% of the stories are negative about a Republican. Now tell me why a supposed unbiased site is doing that. A rag isn't electronic? Join the 21st century dude.

(chuckle)

Dude; you're being challenged to prove your allegation that 40% of the stories are anti-Trump. Proving allegations is a requirement for credible argumentation.

Can you prove the allegation or not?
 
(chuckle)

Dude; you're being challenged to prove your allegation that 40% of the stories are anti-Trump. Proving allegations is a requirement for credible argumentation.

Can you prove the allegation or not?

Let's I took a picture, and counted the anti-Trump headlines. But you're the last man on this website that should be talking about credibility.
 
Let's I took a picture, and counted the anti-Trump headlines. But you're the last man on this website that should be talking about credibility.

Let's just say you can't prove your assertion and leave at that.

We'll have to, because you can't prove your assertion which discredits you and your OP.

Merry Christmas
 
Back
Top Bottom