Climate scientist explains people are not appreciating how big the problem is

[nvflash]

Of course the climate scientist want to be the one's dictating to the world and controlling every aspect of human life.

They even think they can control the weather, or at least they what you to think they can.

And what is the point of it?

Global tax, global socialism, and global control.

A new oder of the ages with they themselves being at the very top of society. So of course 99.9% of all scientist agree on the 'facts' and anyone who challenges what they say is subject to verbal stoning.

 

[longview]

Point A is supported by empirical evidence. Point B is not supported by any evidence. Point A is reality, while point B is pure fantasy.

Point B does not specify a percentage of the warming from part A that is a result of human activity! This means that anyone who even thinks human activity caused any warming would be part of the consensus.

 

[longview]

Of course the climate scientist want to be the one's dictating to the world and controlling every aspect of human life.

They even think they can control the weather, or at least they what you to think they can.

And what is the point of it?

Global tax, global socialism, and global control.

A new oder of the ages with they themselves being at the very top of society. So of course 99.9% of all scientist agree on the 'facts' and anyone who challenges what they say is subject to verbal stoning.

Far worse than verbal, skeptical scientists have their funding cut, and are denied publication.

 

[nvflash]

Far worse than verbal, skeptical scientists have their funding cut, and are denied publication.

Of course they do, government wants to pump this nonsense too, because government wants absolute control. Socialism without many or any individual rights to worry about, panels of 'experts' telling us everything we must do inside and outside our homes.

The Political elite could make the science say anything they want it to say.

It's really world communism, but that has always been the goal of socialism. We'd still have powerful corporations, but they would be puppets to the State.

It's really not all that bad in theory, but where the rubber meets the road is in practice, and we know how communism always works out. It is wholly corrupt, and recognizes nothing greater than the power of the State.

It always works out that nothing and no one can question the official information and doctrine coming from the State.

It seeks to be worldwide and leaving no escape. I'm sure it could make use of a State religion, but outside of that any religion that challenge it's authority would be 'put down'.

Within the US we are better than half way there already.

 

[longview]

Of course they do, government wants to pump this nonsense too, because government wants absolute control. Socialism without many or any individual rights to worry about, panels of 'experts' telling us everything we must do inside and outside our homes.

The Political elite could make the science say anything they want it to say.

It's really world communism, but that has always been the goal of socialism. We'd still have powerful corporations, but they would be puppets to the State.

It's really not all that bad in theory, but where the rubber meets the road is in practice, and we know how communism always works out. It is wholly corrupt, and recognizes nothing greater than the power of the State.

It always works out that nothing and no one can question the official information and doctrine coming from the State.

It seeks to be worldwide and leaving no escape. I'm sure it could make use of a State religion, but outside of that any religion that challenge it's authority would be 'put down'.

Within the US we are better than half way there already.

Science will win out in the end, the only question is how long it will take.

 

[Lord of Planar]

It's label "opinion" for a reason.

Not only that, Bill McGuire is a Volcanologist. Any time someone from a sister science opposing the AWG agenda, they are discredited by these same lefties for not being a "climatologist."

 

[Lord of Planar]

It's opinions based on scientic data from the most brilliant scientists in the world, and they have the documented data to prove it.

When you can disprove it, let us know.

Show us his proof.

 

[Lord of Planar]

It’s informed opinion.

Unlike your post.

My posts are very highly informed as i have been studying this topic for probably 20 years now, yet you dismiss my opinion all the time.

Having engineering types of science under my belt, I understand actual tests vs. hypothesis.

 

[NolanVoyd]

It's label "opinion" for a reason.

Right.

Because it is that climate scientist's opinion

Do you have a comment on it? Or were you just stating the obvious?

 

[Threegoofs]

My posts are very highly informed as i have been studying this topic for probably 20 years now, yet you dismiss my opinion all the time.

LOL. Your posts speak for themselves.

I do wonder how long it takes for new assholes to heal, because I’ve seen you get a new one just about monthly. Do the scars remain?

Having engineering types of science under my belt, I understand actual tests vs. hypothesis.

yet still can’t grasp what has been predicted and how todays reality shows precisely how the science has predicted the actual conditions.

 

[Bullseye]

Right.

Because it is that climate scientist's opinion

Do you have a comment on it? Or were you just stating the obvious?

Maybe if you thought real hard you'd grasp that I already have commented.

 

[Diomedes]

My posts are very highly informed as i have been studying this topic for probably 20 years now, yet you dismiss my opinion all the time.

Having engineering types of science under my belt, I understand actual tests vs. hypothesis.

What kind? Michael Crichton was highly educated and he didn't believe in man made global warming...but he wasn't a climatologist.

 

[Lord of Planar]

yet still can’t grasp what has been predicted and how todays reality shows precisely how the science has predicted the actual conditions.

Predicted? Bullshit. The science does not make catastrophic claims or properly take into account other factors that accomplish the same thing. That is the pundits lying about what the science says. Especially these last 4 decades, since we have more surface insolation after EPA actions here and similar actions in other nations.

 

[Threegoofs]

Predicted? Bullshit. The science does not make catastrophic claims or properly take into account other factors that accomplish the same thing. That is the pundits lying about what the science says. Especially these last 4 decades, since we have more surface insolation after EPA actions here and similar actions in other nations.

In the late 80s, it was predicted that the accumulation of human made GHG would cause world temperatures to rise in both oceans snd on land.

Those predictions were spot on, and you have been whining about it for over a decade as the data gets clearer every year.

 

[Helix]

Some people are not convincible. There are plenty of examples of this on any message board or on other social media sites. They will not change their minds about CC no matter what you post. About the only thing that you can do is to vote against them. I consider the environmental forum to be similar to the gun control forum. I mean, if you have some extra time, go for it, but don't really expect anything different to happen.

 

[Lord of Planar]

In the late 80s, it was predicted that the accumulation of human made GHG would cause world temperatures to rise in both oceans snd on land.

Those predictions were spot on, and you have been whining about it for over a decade as the data gets clearer every year.

Rise? Yes. The quantification and cause are contentious. the quantification is so full of bullshit, we might actually be cooling, but I will not make that claim.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Some people are not convincible. There are plenty of examples of this on any message board or on other social media sites. They will not change their minds about CC no matter what you post.

This is true. However, I do practice science, and I know without hesitation that what we see in the media and by the assumed authority is bullshitt.

About the only thing that you can do is to vote against them.

How do you vote against the lying IPCC?

I consider the environmental forum to be similar to the gun control forum. I mean, if you have some extra time, go for it, but don't really expect anything different to happen.

We should keep guns out of known violent criminals and people who suffer mentally. That said, gun control is hitting your target.

 

[Threegoofs]

This is true. However, I do practice science, and I know without hesitation that what we see in the media and by the assumed authority is bullshitt.

You do engineering. That’s not science, it’s applied science. And from my perspective, it’s the anonymous guy insisting the worlds scientists don’t know as much as him is the bullshit scenario,

How do you vote against the lying IPCC?

Yes, thousands of scientists are conspiring to lie. It’s a giant conspiracy!

LOL

We should keep guns out of known violent criminals and people who suffer mentally. That said, gun control is hitting your target.

 

[Lord of Planar]

You do engineering. That’s not science, it’s applied science.

Yes. I actually apply science and know what does and does not work that researchers claim will be true and valid.

Yes, thousands of scientists are conspiring to lie. It’s a giant conspiracy!

LOL

A person working for their self interest and survival in a field is not being part of a conspiracy. people often work for an employer that they disagree with. have to put food an the table and pay the mortgage. Research papers go give them compensation in one form or another, and the IPCC et. at.probably has more research money to offer than anyone else when it comes to research.

Follow the money.

 

[Threegoofs]

Yes. I actually apply science and know what does and does not work that researchers claim will be true and valid.

A person working for their self interest and survival in a field is not being part of a conspiracy. people often work for an employer that they disagree with. have to put food an the table and pay the mortgage. Research papers go give them compensation in one form or another, and the IPCC et. at.probably has more research money to offer than anyone else when it comes to research.

Follow the money.

The IPCC doesn’t fund research.

But keep on making shit up to create your giant conspiracy theory.

We’ll continue to laugh.

 

[Lord of Planar]

The IPCC doesn’t fund research.

But keep on making shit up to create your giant conspiracy theory.

We’ll continue to laugh.

They are part of the selection process.

 

[Threegoofs]

They are part of the selection process.

No, but thanks for playing.

 

[Lord of Planar]

No, but thanks for playing.

Are you saying there is not any prestige for a scientists by having their paper selected by the IPCC?

They motivate continued sloppy science.

 

[Threegoofs]

Are you saying there is not any prestige for a scientists by having their paper selected by the IPCC?

They motivate continued sloppy science.

They have no funding role. I don’t think getting selected in a review years after publication is where the ‘prestige’ for doing good science is at.

Weird that you claim to know everything about science, but don’t know how things get funded and what the incentives are to do good work.

 

[Lord of Planar]

They have no funding role. I don’t think getting selected in a review years after publication is where the ‘prestige’ for doing good science is at.

Weird that you claim to know everything about science, but don’t know how things get funded and what the incentives are to do good work.

If they write material that nobody wants, who will give them grant money?