• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chuck Todd fails to correct blatant lie by Democrat about Trump JT meeting on MTP

tres borrachos said:
So you can't tell me where on the email Obama would have seen "this is an unsecured server in Hillary's bathroom"?

And Trump's lies are of no consequence to you, but the Democrats' lies are?
Click to expand...

The server is either listed as a secure server, or not. Obama certainly knew the server and address Hillary was using was not secure. He literally couldn't send anything to her server without knowing. Hillary couldn't send some classified things without first removing identifiers requiring a secure transmission.
 
humbolt said:
The server is either listed as a secure server, or not. Obama certainly knew the server and address Hillary was using was not secure. He literally couldn't send anything to her server without knowing. Hillary couldn't send some classified things without first removing identifiers requiring a secure transmission.
Click to expand...

I keep asking you where in Obama's email it was listed as a "secure" or "unsecure" server.

You won't answer.

Now please answer.

When Obama wrote an email to her, where is the information on the email he sent that showed him that he was sending an email to her that would be received on a server in her bathroom?
 
The implication could be reasonably drawn from the Goldstone email that the information was not obtained legally or else why the secrecy?

Shakespeare wrote a play about this thread topic - MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
 
KLATTU said:
LAFFRIOT

That's your defense. Plural?

That Nadler went on MTP without having read the report , which makes it crystal clear this major Dem talking point was BS?
Click to expand...

He doesn't care. He most likely endorses any lie, so long as it remotely targets Trump.
 
tres borrachos said:
Clinton was a silver tongued liar. Obama wasn't a liar. Trump is a liar for no reason. I disagree with you Humbolt. Trump is actually a very good liar, and that's what concerns me.

I do vote people out when I can. I didn't have a chance to ever cast a vote against Reid but I would have if I lived in Nevada. I was so glad to see him go.
Click to expand...

Yeah.. I'm just going to sit this here for starters...

Obama's biggest whoppers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/01/19/obamas-biggest-whoppers/?utm_term=.2e6100068090
 
tres borrachos said:
I keep asking you where in Obama's email it was listed as a "secure" or "unsecure" server.

You won't answer.

Now please answer.

When Obama wrote an email to her, where is the information on the email he sent that showed him that he was sending an email to her that would be received on a server in her bathroom?
Click to expand...


I believe it's literally the ".gov" in the email address. If the address isn't from or to .gov, it's not a government secure server.
 
tres borrachos said:
I keep asking you where in Obama's email it was listed as a "secure" or "unsecure" server.

You won't answer.

Now please answer.

When Obama wrote an email to her, where is the information on the email he sent that showed him that he was sending an email to her that would be received on a server in her bathroom?
Click to expand...

You're asking the wrong questions. My experience is over two decades old, and I'm sure things are more sophisticated than back then, but It's not possible the president was unaware he was communicating with an insecure device. You might ask yourself why Hillary's aides were forced to remove headers from documents in order to forward them over insecure devices.

That Obama communicated with Clinton's devices is a matter of public record, and more examples have been recently discovered. Obama was fully aware of Clinton's insecure server, and lied about it.
 
humbolt said:
You're asking the wrong questions. My experience is over two decades old, and I'm sure things are more sophisticated than back then, but It's not possible the president was unaware he was communicating with an insecure device. You might ask yourself why Hillary's aides were forced to remove headers from documents in order to forward them over insecure devices.

That Obama communicated with Clinton's devices is a matter of public record, and more examples have been recently discovered. Obama was fully aware of Clinton's insecure server, and lied about it.
Click to expand...

I don't have to ask myself anything. I don't care about the issue. "Her emails" has been discussed, evaluated, and investigated ad nauseum. Nobody cares anymore.

I focus on the current President. It isn't Obama, and it isn't Hillary.
 
Mycroft said:
The House Dems will never shy away from spin, speculation, innuendo, hyperbole...and in this case, outright lies...in their efforts to prevent Trump from winning in 2020. They know their useful idiots won't question any of the nonsense they spew.
Click to expand...

The ****ing irony of a birther and Trump supporter uttering this is absolutely mind blowing.

Wouldn’t be the first time though would it Mycroft.
 
Nadler is a professional liar for his employers - Russia, China, Iran and Kim Jung Un. He was just doing his job like he was told to do by his bosses. If he ever told the truth he'd be fired in the next election if not sooner.
 
tres borrachos said:
I don't have to ask myself anything. I don't care about the issue. "Her emails" has been discussed, evaluated, and investigated ad nauseum. Nobody cares anymore.

I focus on the current President. It isn't Obama, and it isn't Hillary.
Click to expand...

You asked. Obama lied. Whether you care or not doesn't change either of those facts.
 
humbolt said:
You asked. Obama lied. Whether you care or not doesn't change either of those facts.
Click to expand...

Cool story. I disagree that he lied. But again, it doesn't matter. He isn't President anymore. I have more concern about the current President and his lies. And continue to laugh at the faux outrage in this thread about what Chuck Todd didn't do, coming from people who support the biggest liar I think most of us have ever seen.

And Don Junior is nothing to anyone in this country. He isn't an elected official. He's the son of the President. Nobody cares.
 
tres borrachos said:
It's considered rude to post articles behind firewalls.
Click to expand...

Then you would be the first I've seen run into such a wall.

But if someone says that Obama didn't lie, when one of his leading quotes from several of his speeches. Was that his presidency was free of scandal... yeah...

I don't trust it.
 
Oborosen said:
Then you would be the first I've seen run into such a wall.

But if someone says that Obama didn't lie, when one of his leading quotes from several of his speeches. Was that his presidency was free of scandal... yeah...

I don't trust it.
Click to expand...

Oh yes, I'm the first poster on DP ever to run into a paywall. It never happened before me! Except for all the times it does.
 
No one has ever considered Mr. Todd to be a genuine journalist.

So why the astonishment at his failure "to correct a lie"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom