• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chinese-Made Infant Flesh Capsules Seized in S. Korea

\

ou’re missing my point.

ABC News doesn’t randomly pick moldy oldies and recycle them on social media.

Operators who set up fake news sites disguised as real news organizations do. Indeed, this fits the pattern of Russian originated fake news right to the tee. ABC News was one of the legitimate fronts that the Russians used in 2016, even!

The Russian campaign works (obviously, as Robert Mueller pointed out, this needs to be discussed in the present tense), by identifying influencers who are themselves receptive to a particular type of message. They count on the target taking it at face value, being outraged (manufactured outrage is the coin of the realm on cable TV news, talk radio, and the infotainment media, regardless of ideology). They also count on thier influencers spreading the poison through their own social media accounts and on forums like this, thus multiplying their ability to plant their message (with no investment at all).

You’re spreading this story for them. Quite innocently, of course.

HOw many thousands of people saw the same Tweet that you did? And how many of them endorsed it unofficially by sharing it with others????

Just look at this thread.

Not one of the like minded folks who saw the OP even thought to question whether it was true or not.

Like you, and millions of other innocent people, they took it at face value and posted their outrage.

If enough people do that, right wing trash tabloids often crib the story and repeat it, also without verifying or fact checking anything.

Not one of them said to themselves’ “ hey, wait a minute, this is way over the top!”

It took me less than three minutes to figure out that this was fake.

All you had to do was google the title, the subject, or the names, and see what comes up.

If nothing comes up, it’s fake.

If the only other stories are from people like Gateway Pundit, PJ Media, Breitbart, WND, and the rest, it’s probably fake. None of these people fact check anything.

As a basic precaution, I NEVER click on embedded links on social media, nor do I ever share anything. If I see something the piques my curiosity, I search the embedded link via a search engine (to keep the Trojans the might vacuum my contacts list from doing so). The Russians, and other people who use this technique are not interested in me. I am unlikely to spread their message.

And the message is an appeal to xenophobia, by recycling the idea that the Chinese eat human flesh, a notion that goes all the way back to Fu Manchu (a fictional character created by and Englishman in the 1920’s).

Nobody did anything wrong, nefarious, or evil. No one, except the people who created this fraud. Innocent people took it at face value and spread it.

This is how the Russian campaign works.

It’s clearly still ongoing. And as we all know, Trump is all on board with it.

You've described the process from which the partners of the DNC, the MSM, operates.

You've offered no proof, simply strawmaned the article, and then twisted it into an attack on Trump.

Your projection is complete.
 
\

ou’re missing my point.

ABC News doesn’t randomly pick moldy oldies and recycle them on social media.

Operators who set up fake news sites disguised as real news organizations do. Indeed, this fits the pattern of Russian originated fake news right to the tee. ABC News was one of the legitimate fronts that the Russians used in 2016, even!

The Russian campaign works (obviously, as Robert Mueller pointed out, this needs to be discussed in the present tense), by identifying influencers who are themselves receptive to a particular type of message. They count on the target taking it at face value, being outraged (manufactured outrage is the coin of the realm on cable TV news, talk radio, and the infotainment media, regardless of ideology). They also count on thier influencers spreading the poison through their own social media accounts and on forums like this, thus multiplying their ability to plant their message (with no investment at all).

You’re spreading this story for them. Quite innocently, of course.

HOw many thousands of people saw the same Tweet that you did? And how many of them endorsed it unofficially by sharing it with others????

Just look at this thread.

Not one of the like minded folks who saw the OP even thought to question whether it was true or not.

Like you, and millions of other innocent people, they took it at face value and posted their outrage.

If enough people do that, right wing trash tabloids often crib the story and repeat it, also without verifying or fact checking anything.

Not one of them said to themselves’ “ hey, wait a minute, this is way over the top!”

It took me less than three minutes to figure out that this was fake.

All you had to do was google the title, the subject, or the names, and see what comes up.

If nothing comes up, it’s fake.

If the only other stories are from people like Gateway Pundit, PJ Media, Breitbart, WND, and the rest, it’s probably fake. None of these people fact check anything.

As a basic precaution, I NEVER click on embedded links on social media, nor do I ever share anything. If I see something the piques my curiosity, I search the embedded link via a search engine (to keep the Trojans the might vacuum my contacts list from doing so). The Russians, and other people who use this technique are not interested in me. I am unlikely to spread their message.

And the message is an appeal to xenophobia, by recycling the idea that the Chinese eat human flesh, a notion that goes all the way back to Fu Manchu (a fictional character created by and Englishman in the 1920’s).

Nobody did anything wrong, nefarious, or evil. No one, except the people who created this fraud. Innocent people took it at face value and spread it.

This is how the Russian campaign works.

It’s clearly still ongoing. And as we all know, Trump is all on board with it.



Do you put as much thought and research into all the negative stories and accusations against Trump? If you do, I applaud you for your non-hypocritical stance regarding the media.

If you don't, well :shrug:
 
Type in ABC news in to google and you will get ABCnews.go.com as the official website, just like the OP's url link.


Drag and drop the title of the OP into their search engine, and nothing comes back.

This is the ABCNEWS.co.com scam. That one shut down, after being exposed quickly. This is the same scam dressed up another way.
 
Drag and drop the title of the OP into their search engine, and nothing comes back.

This is the ABCNEWS.co.com scam. That one shut down, after being exposed quickly. This is the same scam dressed up another way.

Here lets make it easier for you.

https:// abcnews.go.com/ Health/chinese-made-infant-flesh-capsules-seized-korea/story?id=16296176

written by Susan D. James in 2012
Susan Donaldson James News Stories and Articles
 
Last edited:
Type in ABC news in to google and you will get ABCnews.go.com as the official website, just like the OP's url link.

It appears to do exactly that.
 
I saw that when I was walking the OP back.

UPI is owned by the family of the Reverend Sung Yung Moon, who also own the Washington Times. Neither has been a pillar of good journalism.

Ah, so you're killing the messenger to save face.
 
Except that that is an actual article on actual ABC News, it just happens to be from 7 years ago. The site YOU provided I have no ready way to verify who is running it or to verify the argument it is making.

In fact, that site makes an argument and then provides sources from 2001 that are nothing but stories about "officials" denying a different claim than is set out in the 2012 ABC News article regarding a South Korean criminal case.

So why would an article written in 2018 not cover the South Korean case from 2012, and instead leap frog it to "officials" declaring any such stories lies in 2001?

Not to mention that your original post contains a glaring falsehood... that article is in fact searchable on the ABC news site.

So no, I don't trust your source as much as I trust ABC News.

No it isn't form ABC news its from ABCnews.go.com
ABCnews.com.co - Wikipedia

heh/...
 
\

ou’re missing my point.

ABC News doesn’t randomly pick moldy oldies and recycle them on social media.

Operators who set up fake news sites disguised as real news organizations do. Indeed, this fits the pattern of Russian originated fake news right to the tee. ABC News was one of the legitimate fronts that the Russians used in 2016, even!

The Russian campaign works (obviously, as Robert Mueller pointed out, this needs to be discussed in the present tense), by identifying influencers who are themselves receptive to a particular type of message. They count on the target taking it at face value, being outraged (manufactured outrage is the coin of the realm on cable TV news, talk radio, and the infotainment media, regardless of ideology). They also count on thier influencers spreading the poison through their own social media accounts and on forums like this, thus multiplying their ability to plant their message (with no investment at all).

You’re spreading this story for them. Quite innocently, of course.

HOw many thousands of people saw the same Tweet that you did? And how many of them endorsed it unofficially by sharing it with others????

Just look at this thread.

Not one of the like minded folks who saw the OP even thought to question whether it was true or not.

Like you, and millions of other innocent people, they took it at face value and posted their outrage.

If enough people do that, right wing trash tabloids often crib the story and repeat it, also without verifying or fact checking anything.

Not one of them said to themselves’ “ hey, wait a minute, this is way over the top!”

It took me less than three minutes to figure out that this was fake.

All you had to do was google the title, the subject, or the names, and see what comes up.

If nothing comes up, it’s fake.

If the only other stories are from people like Gateway Pundit, PJ Media, Breitbart, WND, and the rest, it’s probably fake. None of these people fact check anything.

As a basic precaution, I NEVER click on embedded links on social media, nor do I ever share anything. If I see something the piques my curiosity, I search the embedded link via a search engine (to keep the Trojans the might vacuum my contacts list from doing so). The Russians, and other people who use this technique are not interested in me. I am unlikely to spread their message.

And the message is an appeal to xenophobia, by recycling the idea that the Chinese eat human flesh, a notion that goes all the way back to Fu Manchu (a fictional character created by and Englishman in the 1920’s).

Nobody did anything wrong, nefarious, or evil. No one, except the people who created this fraud. Innocent people took it at face value and spread it.

This is how the Russian campaign works.

It’s clearly still ongoing. And as we all know, Trump is all on board with it.

.
.
.

I saw that when I was walking the OP back.

UPI is owned by the family of the Reverend Sung Yung Moon, who also own the Washington Times. Neither has been a pillar of good journalism.

Ah, so you're killing the messenger to save face.

Actually, what he's doing is showing that the OP is BS. Why are do you want it to be true, so badly?

Is it that important that someone else you see as a Trump supporter not have gotten taken in? You have to smear him to try to undermine his well-explained debunking, all to protect the OP so that OP ...what...doesn't let themselves know they were wrong about something?

Tribalism above all else.
 
Drag and drop the title of the OP into their search engine, and nothing comes back.

This is the ABCNEWS.co.com scam. That one shut down, after being exposed quickly. This is the same scam dressed up another way.

It's the genuine ABCnews site and the article is linked to the genuine WSJ site. You seem to be exemplifying precisely the kind of arbitrary pick-and-choose what you'll believe (based on the flimsiest of pretexts, a site seach program tailored towards recent news articles) that you're accusing the OP of.

china korea 17,500 capsules human flesh - Google Search

Result from the BBC top of the page, but I suppose that will be dismissed also...
 
ABC News is not your source. Someone wanted you to believe that it was.

Major mainstream news organizations don’t recycle eight year old stories. Particular ones that turn out not to e true.

Right wing media does do that. In fact, they do it quite frequently.

This is how you peddle a xenophobic meme, not how you inform people.

You appear to be the victim of a disinformation scam. This is exactly the sort of thing the Russians did in 2016 and are still doing now.

You appear to have quite innocently taken it at face value. We all get fooled from time to time.

You spread the fake story to other like minded people who clearly also took it at face value. How many of them shared the story to other people who took it at face value?

This is how the Russian campaign to aid Trump worked. They didn’t have to invest a dime. All they had to do was set ups core number of fake accounts, vacuum a few friends to each, plant the meme, and watch the folks who believe it spread it for them.



I have no idea where the tweet you posted came from. But it’s a very safe bet it wasn’t ABC News.

Yes, you can question my source.

What you can’t do is find any corroboration for your OP.


Again, false. That story is absolutely from ABC news, and you initial argument that you could not search that story on ABC news is just plain false. The rest of your argument false apart from there.
 
.
Actually, what he's doing is showing that the OP is BS. Why are do you want it to be true, so badly?

Is it that important that someone else you see as a Trump supporter not have gotten taken in? You have to smear him to try to undermine his well-explained debunking, all to protect the OP so that OP ...what...doesn't let themselves know they were wrong about something?

Tribalism above all else.

No, he is lying about the initial source and providing websites that nobody has ever heard of as a counter argument that don't even reference the story in question, let alone debunk it.
 
Here lets make it easier for you.

https:// abcnews.go.com/ Health/chinese-made-infant-flesh-capsules-seized-korea/story?id=16296176

written by Susan D. James in 2012
Susan Donaldson James News Stories and Articles

OK, make it easier for me.

Show me that ABC News actually tweeted out an eight year old discredited story.

And while you’re at it, let’s see that they have a regular habit of doing it.
 
Last edited:
Ah, so you're killing the messenger to save face.

They’re not noted for their honesty, and they like the sort of trashy tabloid stories that the Trump base tends to favor.

Again, the absolute lack of any corroboration of this story anywhere other than in the few people who took it from UPI and ran it, and the total lack of any current event along those lines is pretty solid evidence that this is fake,
 
They’re not noted for their honesty, and they like the sort of trashy tabloid stories that the Trump base tends to favor.

Again, the absolute lack of any corroboration of this story anywhere other than in the few people who took it from UPI and ran it, and the total lack of any current event along those lines is pretty solid evidence that this is fake,

See CharisRose's CBS link above or my link to the Guardian on p. 3.
 
It's the genuine ABCnews site and the article is linked to the genuine WSJ site. You seem to be exemplifying precisely the kind of arbitrary pick-and-choose what you'll believe (based on the flimsiest of pretexts, a site seach program tailored towards recent news articles) that you're accusing the OP of.

china korea 17,500 capsules human flesh - Google Search

Result from the BBC top of the page, but I suppose that will be dismissed also...

All that proves is that a wire service story got picked up by various news organizations on the same day, or the next day.

That’s all.

There is one story from 2018.

And nothing else.

Nothing now.

Nothing more in 2012.

Then suddenly, the story shows up on some conservative’s twitter feed, (and probably several thousand or hundred thousand others. Half of them share it. Others repeat it on forums like this.

ABC News doesn’t inexplicably tweet random eight year old stories. Nobody does that, except some of the reactionary right wing blogs, which have been doing it for years.

Like minded folks clearly took it at face value, believed it without checking (at least, not until after I did!).

Google this story a week from now, and you won’t find anything other than the 2012 stories.

I have no doubt about that.
 
Baby is too expensive, just substitute chicken in your recipe. They taste about the same.
 
ABC News is not your source. Someone wanted you to believe that it was.

Major mainstream news organizations don’t recycle eight year old stories. Particular ones that turn out not to e true.

Right wing media does do that. In fact, they do it quite frequently.

This is how you peddle a xenophobic meme, not how you inform people.

You appear to be the victim of a disinformation scam. This is exactly the sort of thing the Russians did in 2016 and are still doing now.

You appear to have quite innocently taken it at face value. We all get fooled from time to time.

You spread the fake story to other like minded people who clearly also took it at face value. How many of them shared the story to other people who took it at face value?

This is how the Russian campaign to aid Trump worked. They didn’t have to invest a dime. All they had to do was set ups core number of fake accounts, vacuum a few friends to each, plant the meme, and watch the folks who believe it spread it for them.



I have no idea where the tweet you posted came from. But it’s a very safe bet it wasn’t ABC News.

Yes, you can question my source.

What you can’t do is find any corroboration for your OP.

Thank you for trying.
But human nature and just plain stubbornness allows people to stick to their guns...no one wants to admit they made a mistake or could have possibly been conned.
Only a bigger person will try to open their minds and say damn they got me. I'll be more careful next time.
 
Chinese-Made Infant Flesh Capsules Seized in S. Korea - ABC News

"The dried flesh of dead infants appears to be the not-so-secret ingredient in a health supplement that is reportedly being smuggled out of China.

The performance-enhancement pills, touted for increasing vitality and sex drive, have been found in the luggage of tourists and in international mail, according to South Korean authorities."


I'm at a loss for words...

It's a sick world.

This is an old story but isn't it just about people who believe that eating the placenta has some benefits.

The story is not only old (2012) but it's kind of sensationalized. I think the "human flesh" is just placenta. I think it's gross but it seems some people do this.

Should I Eat My Placenta?

Your placenta: You could dry it and put it in pills. You could stir-fry it with onions. You could even eat it raw in the delivery room.

Don't faint! The act of eating the placenta after you give birth, called placentophagy, isn't just something animals do. Human moms do it, too, including tribal women and glamorous celebrities. You may be wondering whether you should as well.
 
Isn't there something about dumb-***** that think eating Rhino horns gives them huge hard-ons?..or something as that weird?

The pissy thing is why don't cool items..like Large chocolate malts make you attractive to others? :)

Apparently having a three inch dick makes you obsess over things like rhino horn.
If they drank too many of those malts, they'd lose another inch to fat padding.
 
... the ABC News website IS ABCNews.go.com. You linked to a Wikipedia page for ABCNews.com.co which is NOT the source of the story.

Jdog already pointed it out
Mea culpa
 
Back
Top Bottom