Chief Justice John Roberts Orders New Investigation into Brett Kavanaugh

[TurtleDude]

The opinions of 2400 leftist legal perfessors have determined based on nothing is now a legal basis?

how many of them do you think voted for Trump?

 

[TurtleDude]

What are you talking about?

Post a quote where I want to spend more.

Since we are in top 2-3 percent income I would not mind paying higher taxes if it meant the middle class would spend less in taxes as a trade off. I never said I want more government spending. I am fiscal conservative.

you can send the IRS more money. and if you cut the taxes of the middle class-they tend to want more and more government

 

[TurtleDude]

Are you saying you know Dr Ford? :lol: There goes your chance at being a Supreme Court Justice.

I don't think he meant it in the biblical way :mrgreen:

 

[minnie616]

Ahh, yes, the Haymarket defense. I am not combing through 17k pages of vapid nonsense consisting mostly of militant abortion stances.

You don’t have to comb through my abortion posts since abortion has noting to do with my fiscal conservatism.

But since you bring up abortion again I assure you I do have a militant abortion stance.
I agree with 70 percent of the our citizens that Roe should not be overturned.

I am a member of a Christian Protestant Faith that is pro choice ( Religious Coaliation for Reproductive Choice )

The Supreme Court took into consideration the religious views of the Jewish community and Protestant religions in the Roe v Wade decision.

From Part IX of Roe v Wade.

There has always been strong support for the view that life does not begin until live' birth. This was the belief of the Stoics. [Footnote 56] It appears to be the predominant, though not the unanimous, attitude of the Jewish faith. [Footnote 57] It may be taken to represent also the position of a large segment of the Protestant community, insofar as that can be ascertained; organized groups that have taken a formal position on the abortion issue have generally regarded abortion as a matter for the conscience of the individual and her family. [Footnote 58]

Thank you once again for making this thread about my pro choice opinion when you know it has nothing to do with my being fiscal
Conservative or with my support of tax cuts for our countries middle class.

 

[American]

I don't think he meant it in the biblical way :mrgreen:

I was just messin'. :lol:

 

[OpportunityCost]

You don’t have to comb through my abortion posts since abortion has noting to do with my fiscal conservatism.

But since you bring up abortion again I assure you I do have a militant abortion stance.
I agree with 70 percent of the our citizens that Roe should not be overturned.

I am a member of a Christian Protestant Faith that is pro choice ( Religious Coaliation for Reproductive Choice )

The Supreme Court took into consideration the religious views of the Jewish community and Protestant religions in the Roe v Wade decision.

From Part IX of Roe v Wade.



Thank you once again for making this thread about my pro choice opinion when you know it has nothing to do with my being fiscal
Conservative or with my support of tax cuts for our countries middle class.

So you supported Trumps first round of tax cuts? Because I seem to remember you being holding the opposite stance for some reason.

 

[Fledermaus]

Mine was a 1969 Chevy Caprice with a 396 and a qudrajet four barrel and an A/C that on a hot humid day would blow snow all the way to the rear window.

My first car was a two door Chevy... 454 LS5, Holley 3310, TH400.... Used and abuse by a succession of Marine Corp fighter jocks.... Did I mention it was fiberglass?

 

[Bum]

My first car was a two door Chevy... 454 LS5, Holley 3310, TH400.... Used and abuse by a succession of Marine Corp fighter jocks.... Did I mention it was fiberglass?

I hate you.

I got stuck with a 1974, AMC, Matador Station wagon...orange with fake wood panel on the side.


And LOT of rust...

 

[minnie616]

So you supported Trumps first round of tax cuts? Because I seem to remember you being holding the opposite stance for some reason.

I thought you had me confused with someone else.

 

[Beaudreaux]

My first car was a two door Chevy... 454 LS5, Holley 3310, TH400.... Used and abuse by a succession of Marine Corp fighter jocks.... Did I mention it was fiberglass?

I had two buddies that owned used Vets during high school. I helped one strip the paint off his with Scotchbright pads and paint thinner. It took forever, but it looked pristine when we repainted it candy apple red.

Ah, the good ole' days.

BTW, the engine and other details you gave made it unnecessary to mention the fiberglass.

 

[Fledermaus]

I had two buddies that owned used Vets during high school. I helped one strip the paint off his with Scotchbright pads and paint thinner. It took forever, but it looked pristine when we repainted it candy apple red.

Ah, the good ole' days.

BTW, the engine and other details you gave made it unneeded to mention the fiberglass.

The steering wheel is tilt, telescopic, and wobble. 3 - 6 inches of side play.

 

[Maccabee]

Oh yea I am not happy having a 2nd sexual predator sitting on the SC. You can be proud of supporting them but Kavanaugh is a disgusting piece of **** and is by far the dirtiest most corrupt, dishonest justice on the bench and is a national disgrace.

Do you have evidence that he's a sexual predator?

 

[Kreton]

Do you have evidence that he's a sexual predator?

Yea, and you know what it is. You cons ignore evidence and cry foul. He is a piece of **** sexual predator.

 

[TurtleDude]

Yea, and you know what it is. You cons ignore evidence and cry foul. He is a piece of **** sexual predator.

that moronic claim is based on the claims of a mentally ill woman and a slut who is a pathological liar. Ford's claims are totally unsupported and didn't rise to establishing "sexual predator". Slutnick's claims are even less supported and she crawfished back on them. So you are lying yet again, about Kavanaugh

 

[Thoreau72]

Do you have evidence that he's a sexual predator?

No, but there is evidence that he perjured himself several times.

These days inside the Beltway, if one does not commit perjury, one is way outside the mainstream.

 

[Harshaw]

Quote Originally Posted by OpportunityCost View Post
Partisanship = anyone not liberal in your eyes. The sooner you admit that, the more honest your take on this issue will be.

False.
I am an independent ,and I believe in the art of bipartisan compromise.

You said:

I have no faith in any partisan judge when a known partisan of the same party is investigated.

The only thing you offered about the judge in question was:

Tymkovich is a George W. Bush appointee who is on Trump's Supreme Court short list.

In other words, you simply assume Tymkovich is a "partisan" because a Republican appointed him and that he's on a list to be appointed to the SC by another "Republican." You know nothing about him other than that, so that's the only basis you have to go on.

Which makes you partisan, not he.

 

[Maccabee]

Yea, and you know what it is. You cons ignore evidence and cry foul. He is a piece of **** sexual predator.

Actually, I don't. Why not enlighten me? Just name one peice of corroborating evidence.

 

[Kreton]

Actually, I don't. Why not enlighten me? Just name one peice of corroborating evidence.

Eye witness accounts from the women he was assaulting.

 

[Maccabee]

Eye witness accounts from the women he was assaulting.

None of which were corroberated by evidence. In fact, one of the accusations was proven false.

 

[Kreton]

None of which were corroberated by evidence. In fact, one of the accusations was proven false.

I don't think you understand some of those words.

 

[Maccabee]

I don't think you understand some of those words.

Then please show how any of the accusations were corroborated by evidence.

 

[TurtleDude]

Then please show how any of the accusations were corroborated by evidence.

not one of the three women had anyone actually back up their stories. and what is funny is that the Kavanaugh case was the front page news for two weeks and still not one person came forward to claim that

1) he or she was at a gathering with Ford, Judge and Kavanaugh

2) that Kavanaugh stuck his dick in the face of Ramirez

3) that they were

a) one of the rape victims Slutnick described

b) they were raped by Kavanaugh

c) they saw Slutnick being raped

 

[TurtleDude]

Eye witness accounts from the women he was assaulting.

well Two door Ford claimed that-no one else backed her up

Ramirez's memory was so awful it took 6 days of being coached for her to "remember" it was Kavanaugh who might have shoved his johnson in her face

then we have slutnick whose story is patently idiotic