How is it misinformation to air first hand footage of cops blatantly shooting to kill black people who are innocently surrendering?
One incident does not an entire trend make. Despite one incident here or there that may fit the narrative..... the VAST majority... don't.
I realize that there is a court of public opinion to some degree but a lot of what we're seeing is so blatantly unjust that it can't really be seen another way.
WTF do you mean "It can't be seen another way". Black man gets shot... therefore racism? Thats a huge leap in logic when there are so many other factors, to including the individual officer (because yes police officers are individual people too) jumping to conclutions, not thinking things through, and being too damned scared.
When someone is being shot multiple times who isn't even armed and has in fact already surrendered, what are we supposed to think? That the media is twisting the story???
I can only assume you are referring to the mental health care dude..... that was a very unfortunate event, but nowhere near the "standard" that you are trying to make it out to be.
And what incentive does the media have? Historically the media and everything connected to the government has supported the police no matter what they've done. Only recently have we seen actual charges being laid against police who commit acts of violence. Before recent uproars that was rare and the blue line protected these people. It has taken full scale riots for a shred of accountability to take place and even then it's not enough.
What do you mean it is not enough? Again, go look through the list of shooting incidents on the link I provided.... I assure you there are plenty of incidents in both 2015 and 2016 in which officers were in fact charged... including many that you never even heard of before because the media didn't cover it.
We have evidence of NBC editing the Zimmerman 911 calls to make him sound racist, to stir the pot and piss people off so they can then cover that ****, and therefore increase ratings, and therefore increase the value of their advertising slots.
We have evidence, more recently, of CNN editing videos from the Charlotte shooting to take out the parts where officers were yelling for Scott to drop his weapon, to help spread misinformation and create riots which then they can cover 24hrs and get the famous members of the Race Grievance Industry to tell everyone how evil everything is to spread more distrust, so that when **** goes down they can.... cover it.... increase ratings.... and sell advertising slots.
The way people like yourself throw around the word "accountability", it almost insinuates that you believe Officers involved in any shooting should be charged first and then later set free after the evidence can't convict them. CMPD already did that to quell one riot, how many more Officers lives should be ruined because they encountered a violent subject that they had to defend themselves against? If they don't shoot, they die, if they do shoot, they lose their job, have to move, change names, etc to hide from the monsters out there that will do anything in the name of the RGI.