• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cancel Culture: Goya Foods CEO calls boycott threats a 'suppression of speech'

I guess you have a point with these comments, but it escapes me. This comment is also false, and I don't know why you're making them. Those charities not getting a donation don't see that as a win, so more money to fewer is a win for the fewer, not those who get $0 this round. :confused:

I'm sorry you don't see that for a win. Most people would see Chick-fil-A (I never know how to spell it?) as changing their donation policy to better fit their corporate strategy, and charities such as the Salvation Army distancing itself from donors that don't align with their views as a win, of you don't then I have reached my limits of explanation.
 
I'm sorry you don't see that for a win. Most people would see Chick-fil-A (I never know how to spell it?) as changing their donation policy to better fit their corporate strategy, and charities such as the Salvation Army distancing itself from donors that don't align with their views as a win, of you don't then I have reached my limits of explanation.

I wasn't aware that the Salvation Army (or any of the other dropped charities) made any attempt to distance themselves from Chick-fil-A Foundation.... :confused:

Whatever. Bottom line is the Foundation is, through 2018, making record donations each year to charity. If that's the 'win' then we can agree on that, but I don't understand why you're framing it dishonestly as a win for everyone, when it's objectively not. Bizarre...
 
I don't think the company will go down. At the very VERY most they'd boot their idiot CEO and make a public statement statement and showing about it. That's at the most if anything at all happens.

"They" consist of I believe the CEO and one other family member that own Goya as co owners.
 
Back
Top Bottom