• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can You Tell The Difference Between North Korean And Fox News Propaganda?

It's funny that a bunch of grandchildren/great grandchildren from WWII vets or Korean war vets have been so manipulated.

Or I guess the grandparents would use the word "sad"
 
They will lose their job though

They haven't yet, so what proof do you have that shows North Korea's propaganda, is anything like FOX's reporting, or opinion pieces?

This looks like nothing more than a thread meant to be used as another regressive circle jerk location.

Because your OP left a lot to be desired.
 
So you can't tell the difference. Or you refuse to answer and just decided you couldn't say nothing in response to someone casting shade on your second favorite media source. First is Breitbart of course.

Some claims are so absurd and lacking intelligence, a picture is the best response.

Only in the unhinged world of TDS, would such a comparison be attempted.

Not surprised it triggered the audience it was created for.
 
Some claims are so absurd and lacking intelligence, a picture is the best response.

Only in the unhinged world of TDS, would such a comparison be attempted.

Not surprised it triggered the audience it was created for.

So you failed it then. :lol:
 
FFS... :inandout:
 
How so?

You want to defend the nonsense the radical hack presented in the OP?

Go ahead, give it a try.

This is what it looks like when a boomer snowflake gets triggered everyone.
 
The news casters won't be executed for disagreeing with their leader in Fox's case.

Correct, they just get fired if they speak out negatively about trump. If this president had his way I'm sure more than a few reporters would disappear.
 
The news casters won't be executed for disagreeing with their leader in Fox's case.



As long as Trump doesn't have the same power he wishes to have as Kim does have.
 
They haven't yet, so what proof do you have that shows North Korea's propaganda, is anything like FOX's reporting, or opinion pieces?

This looks like nothing more than a thread meant to be used as another regressive circle jerk location.

Because your OP left a lot to be desired.

Even the vocabulary was basically the aame. So yes, the reporting is pretty similar.
 
Can You Tell The Difference Between North Korean And Fox News Propaganda?

fox propaganda is in English.
 
Correct, they just get fired if they speak out negatively about trump. If this president had his way I'm sure more than a few reporters would disappear.

I can make the same assumption about you, if you were president. But that doesn't make it in any way truthful, and seeing as Trump has never given such an indication. That would just be a sick form of wishful thinking on your part.

Then again we've seen FOX anchors and editors speak in opposition to Trump before, and they still have their jobs. So we already now that you're lying about what would happen.

How about this, would you happen to have any evidence that Trump would do as such?

-off-hand comments against news anchors. Like claims that they would be fired, or imprisoned if they did speak out against him, or the such?
 
As long as Trump doesn't have the same power he wishes to have as Kim does have.

The same could be said of you, though I don't recall Trump wishing that he had such power.

Unless you happen to have some proof of that claim?
 
Even the vocabulary was basically the aame. So yes, the reporting is pretty similar.

So that's a no, you can't actually supply proof of what you're trying to imply here.
 
Back
Top Bottom