• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BREAKING: Man Steps Forward with Sexual Assault Allegations against Sen. Cory Booker

code1211 said:
Does political lean of the accuser impact the credibility of the claim?
Click to expand...

no, according to the Pink ***** hat brigade-it is only the gender.
 
code1211 said:
This allegation is from 2014.
Click to expand...

32 years more current than the Two Door Ford claims. Is Spartacus into the rough trade? Sounds like BS to me but so did Ford and Ramirez's claims and Swetnick was clearly tripping on acid
 
Northern Light said:
How many drugs do you have to be on to believe this non-sense.
Click to expand...

much less than Swetnick was on when she made up her story about 10 rape parties etc
 
OscarLevant said:
Not necessarily, but it could, it depends.

Well, there are a lot of comments and posts being made on this forum. So, one must create a strategy not to overly waste one's time.

With an avatar of KKK leader?

The odds are, yes. Anyone whose world views is through the lens of nationalist white supremacist, etc., is not likely to make sound arguments.


So I"m just playing the odds, using that as a method of deciding whom to channel my debate energy for, and whom to avoid.
Click to expand...

Well, that's one way to filter.
 
GDViking said:
:lamo

Only in the eyes of a blind stumbling partisan...
Click to expand...

Well, your response is based on nothing, but it was pithy.

Care to demonstrate how the testimony of Dr. Ford was based in fact?

It sounded to me much like the way I remember a dream after waking.

Being "based in fact" requires that some demonstrable fact be presented. Where/what are they? Seems like everything she said is at best possible, but very likely untrue as described.
 
TurtleDude said:
32 years more current than the Two Door Ford claims. Is Spartacus into the rough trade? Sounds like BS to me but so did Ford and Ramirez's claims and Swetnick was clearly tripping on acid
Click to expand...

I love the revelations from this last week of the Porn Lawyer being sued and getting kicked out of his offices.

The Democrats should be required to provide Purell baths for the rest of us every time they wheel out their latest pervert de jour.

The Allyssa Milano's of the world seem to have replaced reason with outrage. Do they really no longer have the ability to think? It's interesting how stupid they are when they're writing their own stuff.

Pretty much like the rest of us, but the rest of us don't get that kind of exposure.

Doesn't she have any friends who will speak truth to stupid?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom