PzKfW IVe
Banned
- Joined
- May 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,845
- Reaction score
- 289
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Re: Obama: We have a deal
Of course, if you don't like that option, I supplied three others.
Of course, if you don't like that option, I supplied three others.
Problem solved.
Did you have an -actual- argument aginast the idea?
:shrug:
Like it or not, NOT spending money is -always- an option.Not an option.In the instance you propose - and, apparently have decided to walk away from - you have several choices under a BBA:
Like it or not, NOT spending money is -always- an option.Not an option. We don't let communities struck by disaster to "pick thenselves up by their bootstraps" and "fend for themselves" in this nation when calamity strikes.
Of course, if you don't like that option, I supplied three others.
Like it of not, NOT spending money is -always- an option.Same as the first non-option.
Of course, if you don't like that option, I supplied three others.
Well then -- the issue you raised in a non-issue.That is an option, it's what we do now.
Problem solved.
Yes. A perfectly reasonable way to deal with the issue, one that does not involve borrowing.So there's what? A Natural Disaster Reserve Fund for natural disasters
Did you have an -actual- argument aginast the idea?
I'm sorry that your -first- reaction was to bowrrow the money, but that's on you, not me.Now that's funny coming from the Conservative party of fiscal responsibility we've seen since Reagan. :roll:
:shrug:
Last edited: