Bottom line-Barr told the truth

[Idiometer]

heh heh yeah I read it. I bet you didn't. I can tell. You just read what some other people said about it and then you repeated it. I could tell by your comment at #259.

See Volume II, Introduction, pages 221 through 223.

 

[bubbabgone]

See Volume II, Introduction, pages 221 through 223.

I told you. I read it already. But I understood it so I didn't need to repeat what I read somewhere else.

 

[Idiometer]

I told you. I read it already. But I understood it so I didn't need to repeat what I read somewhere else.

It was your accusation and challenge to me. Don't gripe because I actually DO know what I'm talking about. Sheesh.

 

[ultmd]

Yeah Barr dunked in your faces and there's not a thing you can do about it except repeat dopey left wing bull **** squawk points to other dopey left wingers. Which don't mean JACK in real life.

You should book yourself on the stephen Colbert! All these nothingburgers will get you a lot of hoots and hollers.

:roll: Yet another empty-headed non-response from you.

Geez...I'm sure you're not as ignorant as you pretend to be. Are you? Cuz, that was either some really "high-end" wingnut intellectual analysis (which is, always, graded on a much lower scale than the rest of society)....or another rhetorical white flag from someone who knows he's in over his head. Which is it, KLATTU?

BOTTOM LINE (once again, just to end this thread, since you clearly don't have the chops to engage substantively): Your OP was dumb. Just plain dumb.

Period.

You're dismissed.

 

[Rogue Valley]

:lamo
One thing is clear. Any time...ANY TIME... we see KLATTU saying "BOTTOM LINE...", we can just assume the ACTUAL "bottom line" is the opposite of whatever he suggests.

Lol. Gospel.

 

[What if...?]

Liberal gibberish.
WE actually have the full report.

Where's the Bull??
"Barr stated that the Special Counsel's report (1) did not find conspiracy or coordination between any members of the Trump campaign and the Russians, (2) laid out evidence on both sides of the obstruction of justice issue, and (3) did not reach a determination on obstruction charges either way, adding that this lack of a decision did not constitute an exoneration (a key distinction that Barr included in his memo). All of that was correct and accurate. We know this because we have the report itself, thanks to Barr. "


Tell us the exact lie in Barr's memo??

We'll wait.

Well, he may have gotten the truth right but failed miserably at the "whole truth and nothing but the truth" part.

Y'all need to fo us on independents you actually know.

We can all read here.

 

[KLATTU]

Well, he may have gotten the truth right but failed miserably at the "whole truth and nothing but the truth" part.

Y'all need to fo us on independents you actually know.

We can all read here.

So you can't tell us the lie in Barr's memo.Because he told the truth.Exactly as I said.
We can all read here,

 

[KLATTU]

:roll: Yet another empty-headed non-response from you.

Geez...I'm sure you're not as ignorant as you pretend to be. Are you? Cuz, that was either some really "high-end" wingnut intellectual analysis (which is, always, graded on a much lower scale than the rest of society)....or another rhetorical white flag from someone who knows he's in over his head. Which is it, KLATTU?

BOTTOM LINE (once again, just to end this thread, since you clearly don't have the chops to engage substantively): Your OP was dumb. Just plain dumb.

Period.

You're dismissed.

Blah blah blah.

Did you find the lie yet?

...........waiting...................

 

[KLATTU]

liberal law prof...
Democrats showing contempt by holding William Barr in contempt | TheHill

False statements

Democrats have struggled to focus attention on the summary Barr wrote rather than on the actual report. While Democrats claim the summary misrepresented the report, the report tracks the conclusions referenced in the letter Barr sent. Barr said Mueller did not find evidence of a crime linked to collusion or conspiracy with the Russians. That is true. He said Mueller did not reach a conclusion on obstruction. That is also true.
ADVERTISEMENT

Barr said he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded the evidence, particularly on the lack of a clear showing of corrupt intent here, did not support an obstruction charge. That is again true. Barr then added the most damaging line of the report, stating Mueller expressly did not exonerate Trump. Barr also gave Mueller an opportunity to review his letter, but Mueller chose to decline. However, his letter was not false.

 

[tres borrachos]

liberal law prof...
Democrats showing contempt by holding William Barr in contempt | TheHill

False statements

Democrats have struggled to focus attention on the summary Barr wrote rather than on the actual report. While Democrats claim the summary misrepresented the report, the report tracks the conclusions referenced in the letter Barr sent. Barr said Mueller did not find evidence of a crime linked to collusion or conspiracy with the Russians. That is true. He said Mueller did not reach a conclusion on obstruction. That is also true.
ADVERTISEMENT

Barr said he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded the evidence, particularly on the lack of a clear showing of corrupt intent here, did not support an obstruction charge. That is again true. Barr then added the most damaging line of the report, stating Mueller expressly did not exonerate Trump. Barr also gave Mueller an opportunity to review his letter, but Mueller chose to decline. However, his letter was not false.

Turley is an exceptionally smart man. Your evidence that he's a liberal is....what? You should do research on him. He was Gary Johnson's choice to replace Scalia on the courts. He represented John Boehner and the GOP in their suit against Obama in 2014 for the individual mandate. He publicly supported the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch. Here were his words on Eric Holder.

For Obama, there has been no better sin eater than Holder. When the president promised CIA employees early in his first term that they would not be investigated for torture, it was the attorney general who shielded officials from prosecution. When the Obama administration decided it would expand secret and warrantless surveillance, it was Holder who justified it. When the president wanted the authority to kill any American he deemed a threat without charge or trial, it was Holder who went public to announce the "kill list" policy. Last week, the Justice Department confirmed that it was Holder who personally approved the equally abusive search of Fox News correspondent James Rosen's e-mail and phone records in another story involving leaked classified information. In the 2010 application for a secret warrant, the Obama administration named Rosen as "an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator" to the leaking of classified materials. The Justice Department even investigated Rosen's parents' telephone number, and Holder was there to justify every attack on the news media

Fire Eric Holder: Column

That's some liberal.