Black Judge in Flynn case continues to defy higher court order to drop the flawed case

[ultmd]

Exculpatory evidence was withheld, and that's a fact.

That's an opinion.

And, more importantly, there is THIS little FACT from Flynn's signed and agreed-to plea deal.

Flynn agreed to “forego the right to any further discovery or disclosures of information not already provided at the time of the entry of Flynn’s guilty plea"...and then Flynn explicitly reiterated that he understood and agreed to that clause...under penalty of perjury....directly to Judge Sullivan's face...at his plea hearing.

Kinda hard to say "I am guilty of the crimes in question" and "I willingly plead guilty to my crimes"....and then say "never mind". The above statement by Flynn pretty much rules that out...UNLESS there is a corrupt AG appointed at a later date.

The corruption in this case came from Barr. That's why well over a THOUSAND former federal judges and prosecutors (conservative and liberal alike) penned a long brief to condemn the behavior of the DOJ under Barr's direction.

 

[ultmd]

Because of democrat obstruction Americans have been kept in the dark until recently about FBI misconduct in the Flynn case. That God that pressures and influence from new conservative judges are now forcing leftist officials to release the incriminating evidences they have been hiding, proven the FBI misconduct.

Explosive New Flynn Documents Show FBI Goal Was To 'Get Him Fired'

New documents filed under seal last week by the Department of Justice provide the clearest evidence yet that the investigation and subsequent prosecution of former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was a set-up from the beginning. Handwritten notes from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that had been inappropriately withheld from Flynn’s defense team for years show that a key goal of the agents investigating Flynn was “to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.”


Someone needs to bring Sullivan up to speed on all of these newly uncovered facts.

:lamo...an op/ed from the Federalist, huh?

Thanks.

I'm pretty sure that Judge Sullivan, that "racist black" judge who should be removed for daring to accept the signed guilty plea of a white man...understands the law just a little better than someone from Trump's mob of uneducated white dudes.

 

[hanger4]

That's an opinion.

And, more importantly, there is THIS little FACT from Flynn's signed and agreed-to plea deal.

Flynn agreed to “forego the right to any further discovery or disclosures of information not already provided at the time of the entry of Flynn’s guilty plea"...and then Flynn explicitly reiterated that he understood and agreed to that clause...under penalty of perjury....directly to Judge Sullivan's face...at his plea hearing.

Kinda hard to say "I am guilty of the crimes in question" and "I willingly plead guilty to my crimes"....and then say "never mind". The above statement by Flynn pretty much rules that out...UNLESS there is a corrupt AG appointed at a later date.

The corruption in this case came from Barr. That's why well over a THOUSAND former federal judges and prosecutors (conservative and liberal alike) penned a long brief to condemn the behavior of the DOJ under Barr's direction.

Oooooh, it's not an opinion, there were several pieces of exculpatory evidence withheld.

As far as the plea deal is concerned a federal law was broken. The deal between the prosecutors and Flynn's first attorneys wasn't entered into the plea filing Judge Sullivan was given.

 

[hanger4]

:lamo...an op/ed from the Federalist, huh?

Thanks.

I'm pretty sure that Judge Sullivan, that "racist black" judge who should be removed for daring to accept the signed guilty plea of a white man...understands the law just a little better than someone from Trump's mob of uneducated white dudes.

*...an op/ed from the Federalist, huh?*

Argumentum ad hominem does not a rebuttal make.

 

[Razoo]

Will an American judge defy the law to illegally and immorally pursue a political agenda? Obviously.

What is his motivation? To please democrats? To further vent his vengeful wrath against an innocent victim he despises? Congress needs to impeach this lawless bozo.

Michael Flynn Case: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case | National Review

Judge Emmett Sullivan refuses to roll over on DC Circuit Flynn ruling. Asks for En Banc hearing before the Appellate Court. If denied, it likely ends. If accepted, this could go on for some time.


Democrats falsely claim Trump is prejudiced against blacks, even though they have no actual evidence to support that felonious claim. However, it looks like this clown of a judge must be prejudiced against whites. Can we not safely draw that conclusion from the facts?

blah blah blah ........

It's not too late for the many Trump criminals ......... to be tried in court.

 

[marke]

:lamo...an op/ed from the Federalist, huh?

Thanks.

I'm pretty sure that Judge Sullivan, that "racist black" judge who should be removed for daring to accept the signed guilty plea of a white man...understands the law just a little better than someone from Trump's mob of uneducated white dudes.

The gangsters from Mueller's democrat mob are obviously paying this black judge a great deal of money to get him to fight the US Justice Department and federal courts in order to try to keep from dropping the case tainted by uncovered FBI misconduct.

 

[marke]

blah blah blah ........

It's not too late for the many Trump criminals ......... to be tried in court.

Democrats have such a long history of corruption in courts that they think they will keep getting away with putting innocent Americans in jail just because that is what they have been accustomed to doing for so long to their political enemies.

 

[Nickyjo]

Will an American judge defy the law to illegally and immorally pursue a political agenda? Obviously.

What is his motivation? To please democrats? To further vent his vengeful wrath against an innocent victim he despises? Congress needs to impeach this lawless bozo.

Michael Flynn Case: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case | National Review

Judge Emmett Sullivan refuses to roll over on DC Circuit Flynn ruling. Asks for En Banc hearing before the Appellate Court. If denied, it likely ends. If accepted, this could go on for some time.


Democrats falsely claim Trump is prejudiced against blacks, even though they have no actual evidence to support that felonious claim. However, it looks like this clown of a judge must be prejudiced against whites. Can we not safely draw that conclusion from the facts?

"Felonious claim"? Trump tweeted patently false info on black on white homicide, suggesting that 80% or so of homicides of whites came at the hands of blacks. FBI stats have it at one eighth or one tenth of that. Check out his actions on the Central Park Five. He couldn't even admit he was wrong in that case. He was dinged by Nixon's admin. for housing discrimination. Then there is the recent book by his niece. Doesn't mean Trump is a racist, just that he uses race to appeal to the presumed bigotry he sees in his supporters, who are probably better people than he is. Really, who cares if Trump is a racist? He's just a garden variety dick.

 

[Robertinfremont]

"Felonious claim"? Trump tweeted patently false info on black on white homicide, suggesting that 80% or so of homicides of whites came at the hands of blacks. FBI stats have it at one eighth or one tenth of that. Check out his actions on the Central Park Five. He couldn't even admit he was wrong in that case. He was dinged by Nixon's admin. for housing discrimination. Then there is the recent book by his niece. Doesn't mean Trump is a racist, just that he uses race to appeal to the presumed bigotry he sees in his supporters, who are probably better people than he is. Really, who cares if Trump is a racist? He's just a garden variety dick.

That did not reply to the actual post . But you managed to ooze racist all through your post.

 

[marke]

"Felonious claim"? Trump tweeted patently false info on black on white homicide, suggesting that 80% or so of homicides of whites came at the hands of blacks. FBI stats have it at one eighth or one tenth of that. Check out his actions on the Central Park Five. He couldn't even admit he was wrong in that case. He was dinged by Nixon's admin. for housing discrimination. Then there is the recent book by his niece. Doesn't mean Trump is a racist, just that he uses race to appeal to the presumed bigotry he sees in his supporters, who are probably better people than he is. Really, who cares if Trump is a racist? He's just a garden variety dick.

All those supposed "evidences" are nothing but the biased opinions of his hateful enemies reflecting their contortions of facts into twisted false narratives to be dishonestly used to try to lynch him for not being democrat.

 

[Nickyjo]

That did not reply to the actual post . But you managed to ooze racist all through your post.

I did not intend to reply to the part of the message that dealt with the Flynn case, as I don't know the legal basis for Sullivan calling for an en banc hearing, nor do I believe that Flynn is innocent. (Here we cue the Irish accent: when ya see a fight brewing between a Flynn and a Sullivan, ya best be stayin' out of it, lad.) I was responding to the notion that it was a "felonious claim" to suggest that Trump was prejudiced against blacks, given evidence that stretches from the Nixon administration to, most recently, his niece's book.

 

[Nickyjo]

All those supposed "evidences" are nothing but the biased opinions of his hateful enemies reflecting their contortions of facts into twisted false narratives to be dishonestly used to try to lynch him for not being democrat.

How is it a twisted false narrative to make reference to the ad Trump placed in the newspapers after the arrest of the Five? You can find the ad easily. How is it false to bring up the lie Trump tweeted about black on white homicide? You can find the chart he sent out easily. But I'm game: The language of the Central Park Five ad seems to me to come from the guy who inspires a lynch mob. If you can explain how I misunderstood Trump's language in the ad, please do. If you can explain his motivation for posting that 80% of white homicide victims were killed by blacks, please do. What was twisted or distorted about relating these facts? Maybe I misunderstood the poor baby's actions. Enlighten me.

Look, your guy might make a fine president on economics, foreign policy, may be useful to people who might believe that the environment or workers are overprotected, that we have to recover a lost greatness, but a unifier, a leader of all the people Trump is not. He doesn't even pretend to be.

 

[marke]

How is it a twisted false narrative to make reference to the ad Trump placed in the newspapers after the arrest of the Five? You can find the ad easily. How is it false to bring up the lie Trump tweeted about black on white homicide? You can find the chart he sent out easily. But I'm game: The language of the Central Park Five ad seems to me to come from the guy who inspires a lynch mob. If you can explain how I misunderstood Trump's language in the ad, please do. If you can explain his motivation for posting that 80% of white homicide victims were killed by blacks, please do. What was twisted or distorted about relating these facts? Maybe I misunderstood the poor baby's actions. Enlighten me.

Look, your guy might make a fine president on economics, foreign policy, may be useful to people who might believe that the environment or workers are overprotected, that we have to recover a lost greatness, but a unifier, a leader of all the people Trump is not. He doesn't even pretend to be.

What is significant about the number "150 million?" That is how many Americans Biden claimed were killed by guns during the Obama administration. Why mention that? Because political leaders sometimes get things wrong and should be allowed some leeway for not being perfect. What is the exact figure of black on white violence in America? Nobody knows for sure. Reports vary. Records vary. Standards of categorization vary. I don't care if Biden says 150 million Americans have been killed by guns or Trump says a certain number of cop murders are by black gunmen, statistics are not perfect, rarely accurate and totally unreliable as irrefutable evidence.

 

[Nickyjo]

What is significant about the number "150 million?" That is how many Americans Biden claimed were killed by guns during the Obama administration. Why mention that? Because political leaders sometimes get things wrong and should be allowed some leeway for not being perfect. What is the exact figure of black on white violence in America? Nobody knows for sure. Reports vary. Records vary. Standards of categorization vary. I don't care if Biden says 150 million Americans have been killed by guns or Trump says a certain number of cop murders are by black gunmen, statistics are not perfect, rarely accurate and totally unreliable as irrefutable evidence.

Sounds like Biden blew it. Trump didn't blow it. He sent a tweet with a chart and numbers from a non-existent foundation in San Francisco, complete with a masked menacing figure pointing a gun. The real stats that show how far off this was came from the FBI, you know a US government agency that actually exists. There is a pattern here, a unmistakeable one. Trump keeps bringing up fear of "the other," a common theme of tyrants, in the form of foreigners and darker people. Face it? Doesn't mean he might not do great things as president. But a unifying figure he is not. He thinks that works for him, that his supporters hate as much as he wants them to.

 

[Diesel]

The gangsters from Mueller's democrat mob are obviously paying this black judge a great deal of money to get him to fight the US Justice Department and federal courts in order to try to keep from dropping the case tainted by uncovered FBI misconduct.

Your racism is leaving a mark on my floors.

 

[Diesel]

Did you notice how it’s a “black judge” not just a federal judge...

I did. I mean, let's be real. Th is is July 2020. Everyone who supports Donald Trump is a racist. That's the entire story.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

The Circuit has ordered an en banc review.

Oral arguments set for August 11th.

 

[chuckiechan]

The Circuit has ordered an en banc review.

Oral arguments set for August 11th.

If the court sides with Flynn, I hope they order Sullivan to pay his additional legal fees for pulling this stunt.

It’s interesting to me that in legal world ~ 2 weeks is light speed.

 

[calamity]

If the court sides with Flynn, I hope they order Sullivan to pay his additional legal fees for pulling this stunt.

Flynn belongs in jail.

 

[chuckiechan]

Flynn belongs in jail.

Then so do you.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

If the court sides with Flynn, I hope they order Sullivan to pay his additional legal fees for pulling this stunt.

It’s interesting to me that in legal world ~ 2 weeks is light speed.

They won't award legal fees. That's not how criminal law works.

Also, I'm almost certain Powell is representing Flynn pro bono.