• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Black Judge in Flynn case continues to defy higher court order to drop the flawed case

Take my advice. Never argue with an evolutionist professor if he insists you are an ape. He likely cannot help himself. He probably sucked up all the evolution crap without question when he was in school and is now incapable of seeing why he is wrong. Leftist morons feel free to call me an ape but they lose their composure if I suggest they are baboons.

no one is talking about arguing with professors. we here notice which threads and posts you use the words "ape" and "baboon" in. it's totally transparent.


so, what happened to you personally that makes you hate black people so much? was it taught or was there an event? or is it something else like jealously ?
 
The Right opened this thread and is posting to it as if they thought they could bamboozle 5th graders.

Their posts to the thread are incredulous if not astoundingly idiotic.

It only shows they've got nuthin left any more. Pissing up a rope blindfolded is what they're doing.

Any implied fantasy will do for the right wing.
 
I wonder if, when Sullivan is finally out of options and dismisses the case, or when it is taken out of his hands entirely, will he suffer any consequences for his prolonging the trial?

Can Flynn bring suit against Sullivan for mental anguish and judicial malfeasance? Probably not. Too bad.

Nope, nothing the judge has done is outside regular order. The DoJ's efforts however...
 
Your reality has little resemblance to this planet.


In theory, Judge Sullivan could be impeached for violation of his oath of office. I doubt it happens.

Here's a reality check...you can't find any violation of his oath. Try again?
 
Democrats are like Hitler's Nazi supporters in Germany. They don't give a damn about people outside their approved Nazi circles and believe all laws are enforceable only by members of the Nazi Party and for the benefit of the Nazi Party. The Nazi Party, also, is not to be bound by the laws which others are to be brutally oppressed under.

Don't elect these proud oppressors in 2020. Vote republican.

word salad
 
Here's a reality check...you can't find any violation of his oath. Try again?
Reality check, my ass. He vowed to uphold the law, so refusing to follow the law is a violation of his oath.

Just to be clear, new evidence has shown that Flynn is innocent of the charges and the prosecution agrees that the evidence so shows. I don't know why you would think he had not violated his oath, unless you believe he should convict an innocent man.
 
Reality check, my ass. He vowed to uphold the law, so refusing to follow the law is a violation of his oath.

Just to be clear, new evidence has shown that Flynn is innocent of the charges and the prosecution agrees that the evidence so shows. I don't know why you would think he had not violated his oath, unless you believe he should convict an innocent man.

Show me how he violated the law. You can't. Show me that new evidence. You can't. The judge doesn't convict, unless it's a bench trial. The defendant pled guilty. And Flynn is not innocent.
 
Any implied fantasy will do for the right wing.

Indeed and while the Right knew the score with the 3 judge appeals panel, ie, it came out as most everyone left and right had called it, 2-1 for Flynn, most everyone knew the score on it going in.

The Right has also been apprised by its mass of highly financed rightwing media that the full appeals court is the likely opposite. Of the 11 active judges who will hear the case 7 are Democratic Party appointed while only 4 are Republican appointed. This is radically different from the 3 judge panel that was 2R v 1D. Hence the Right are flailing on this one as they have zero hope for it.

The word I got among lawyers is that Judge Sullivan hired Beth Wilkinson to argue the case before the full court of appeals after the 3 judge panel had shot its wad which the panel did do and is now history. Neither is this the kind of case Scotus would consider significant to put on its docket.

Flynn meanwhile is out on the Trump campaign trail where he is considered so invaluable that springing him was a highest priority of PutinTrumpBarr. It's considered Flynn's 'lock her up' at the convention and afterward tilted the three blue states. So even if the full appeals court moves fast it's still unlikely to be fast enough to decide before November. The case will end up back in Sullivan's court anyway for more processing to include Judge Sullivan ordering the gallows spruced up.
 
no one is talking about arguing with professors. we here notice which threads and posts you use the words "ape" and "baboon" in. it's totally transparent.


so, what happened to you personally that makes you hate black people so much? was it taught or was there an event? or is it something else like jealously ?

What makes you think you know what other people think?
 
What makes you think you know what other people think?

You showed us what you think by starting a thread with "Black Judge."
 
What makes you think you know what other people think?

well, you could be on here posting stuff that you don't beleive. that's a posibility.

if you are posting how you feel, it's not hard to tell what you're like. we've all seen it (those of us with a little age) thousands of times.


now, what made you this way? did something happened to you personally that makes you hate black people so much? was it taught or was there an event? or is it something else like jealously ?
 
Then what the hell is he doing by refusing to drop the case that the prosecutor and his boss have dropped. Of course he has no business taking up the prosecution of Flynn when the state has dropped the charges. He shows himself to be a corrupted partisan hack crook.

The ignorance of your argument, above, has been explained to you repeatedly in this thread. Each time, you have run from it and avoided it.

There is no need to "prosecute" a case in which the defended has REPEATEDLY pleaded "guilty, your honor" to multiple felonies. That you continue to ignore reality, in favor of a moronic point of view that you cannot even defend...says everything we need to know about you.

No, I don't believe Sullivan is a racist,

Too late. You've already stated, REPEATEDLY, that you believe Judge Sullivan is a racist, simply because he is a black judge presiding over a white man.

but I remind those intent on calling Trump a racist that there is far more evidence Sullivan is a racist than there is that Trump is a racist.
And we remind you that this is a moronic LIE. Trump has a DOCUMENTED history of racism dating back to the early 70's (at the very least). Only idiots and gutless racists still pretend that Trump is not a racist.

On the other hand, the ONLY "evidence" you have that Judge Sullivan is "racist", is that he happens to be an African-American judge presiding over the fate of a white man. That's not evidence of anything, except YOUR ignorance and racial bigotry.
 
this is peanuts compared to Barr lol!!!!!!!!!!! you people are Traitors to this country and Trump is definitely is a traitor
 
The ignorance of your argument, above, has been explained to you repeatedly in this thread. Each time, you have run from it and avoided it.

There is no need to "prosecute" a case in which the defended has REPEATEDLY pleaded "guilty, your honor" to multiple felonies. That you continue to ignore reality, in favor of a moronic point of view that you cannot even defend...says everything we need to know about you.

The prosecutor dropped the case due to misconduct by the FBI. It is not the judge's job to take it back up himself as prosecutor, especially due to political animosity towards Trump and his administration.

Too late. You've already stated, REPEATEDLY, that you believe Judge Sullivan is a racist, simply because he is a black judge presiding over a white man.

No, I don't really believe he is a racist, but it is just as wrong to accuse him of racism as it is to accuse Trump of racism.

And we remind you that this is a moronic LIE. Trump has a DOCUMENTED history of racism dating back to the early 70's (at the very least). Only idiots and gutless racists still pretend that Trump is not a racist.

Some people may be convinced Trump is a racist just like other people may be convinced Sullivan is a racist, and they have their reasons. But that does not prove either of them are racist.

On the other hand, the ONLY "evidence" you have that Judge Sullivan is "racist", is that he happens to be an African-American judge presiding over the fate of a white man. That's not evidence of anything, except YOUR ignorance and racial bigotry.

I don't agree with your statements or your reasoning.
 
this is peanuts compared to Barr lol!!!!!!!!!!! you people are Traitors to this country and Trump is definitely is a traitor

No, Trump is not calling for the destruction of America for being evil and being founded on evil.

National Museum of African American History Says Nuclear Family, Science, Hard Work Are 'White Culture' - National File

The National Museum of African American History and Culture released a new web page explaining white culture and how it can be contrasted to African American culture, claiming that the Protestant work ethic, scientific method, delayed gratification, and a series of other generally positive attributes, are all aspects of “white culture.

The museum, part of the Smithsonian, claims that “Whiteness and white racialized identity refer to the way that white people, their customs, culture, and beliefs operate as the standard by which all other groups of are compared,” and that the “normalization of white racial identity throughout America’s history have created a culture where nonwhite persons are seen as inferior or abnormal.”

The web page also extols the significance of white privilege in American society, claiming that because white people hold power in the United States, all whites are privileged. “For many white people, this can be hard to hear, understand, or accept – but it is true,” says the National Museum of African American History and Culture. “If you are white in America, you have benefited from the color of your skin.”
 
No, Trump is not calling for the destruction of America for being evil and being founded on evil.

National Museum of African American History Says Nuclear Family, Science, Hard Work Are 'White Culture' - National File

The National Museum of African American History and Culture released a new web page explaining white culture and how it can be contrasted to African American culture, claiming that the Protestant work ethic, scientific method, delayed gratification, and a series of other generally positive attributes, are all aspects of “white culture.

The museum, part of the Smithsonian, claims that “Whiteness and white racialized identity refer to the way that white people, their customs, culture, and beliefs operate as the standard by which all other groups of are compared,” and that the “normalization of white racial identity throughout America’s history have created a culture where nonwhite persons are seen as inferior or abnormal.”

The web page also extols the significance of white privilege in American society, claiming that because white people hold power in the United States, all whites are privileged. “For many white people, this can be hard to hear, understand, or accept – but it is true,” says the National Museum of African American History and Culture. “If you are white in America, you have benefited from the color of your skin.”

Protestant Work Ethic = Whips and Chains

"Ah, if only we can get back to the good ole days when blacks knew their place, women married only who their daddy told them to and gays stayed in the closet like Lindsey Graham."
 
Will an American judge defy the law to illegally and immorally pursue a political agenda? Obviously.

Pointing out the race of the judge for no reason is racist.
 
You showed us what you think by starting a thread with "Black Judge."

Exactly. I'd never call marke "cracker marke," because that would be racist. But I guess marke doesn't play by those rules.
 
Will an American judge defy the law to illegally and immorally pursue a political agenda? Obviously.

What is his motivation? To please democrats? To further vent his vengeful wrath against an innocent victim he despises? Congress needs to impeach this lawless bozo.

Michael Flynn Case: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case | National Review

Judge Emmett Sullivan refuses to roll over on DC Circuit Flynn ruling. Asks for En Banc hearing before the Appellate Court. If denied, it likely ends. If accepted, this could go on for some time.


Democrats falsely claim Trump is prejudiced against blacks, even though they have no actual evidence to support that felonious claim. However, it looks like this clown of a judge must be prejudiced against whites. Can we not safely draw that conclusion from the facts?


Well a bigot sure could draw a conclusion like that but a rational person would draw a completely different one. Seems some judges don't like to see such gross political interference in a case where a guilty plea had been entered.

But by all means deftly make it a racial issue. Seems its a prominent theme with you.
 
Well a bigot sure could draw a conclusion like that but a rational person would draw a completely different one. Seems some judges don't like to see such gross political interference in a case where a guilty plea had been entered.

But by all means deftly make it a racial issue. Seems its a prominent theme with you.

Yes, Marke is definitely projecting there.
 
Did you notice how it’s a “black judge” not just a federal judge...

Marke isn't racist. If you ask him he'll take off his hood and tell you so.
 
The prosecutor dropped the case due to misconduct by the FBI.

Nonsense. There was no misconduct by the FBI. There has only been gross misconduct and corruption from the AG (Barr). The prosecutor dropped Flynn's guilty pleas because he was a corrupt appointee of a corrupt Att. Gen, and everyone understands that. That's why literally THOUSANDS of former federal judges and prosecutors of BOTH parties have taken the extraordinary step to publicly condemn this AG for his corruption and professional misconduct.

What Judge Sullivan understands is this, from Flynn's Guilty Plea Bargain:
-Nothing in this Agreement limits the right of the Government to seek denial of the
adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. 1, and/or imposition of
an adjustment for obstruction of justice, pursuant to U.S.S.G. 3C1.1, regardless of any
agreement set forth above, should your client move to withdraw your client?s guilty plea after it
is entered, or should it be determined by the Government that your client has either engaged
in conduct
, unknown to the Government at the time of the signing of this Agreement, that
constitutes obstruction of justice, or engaged in additional criminal conduct after signing this
Agreement
.


What Judge Sullivan understands is hat the following public statement given by Flynn to him (Sullivan) in court at the time that Flynn confirmed guilt:
-"I recognize that the actions I acknowledged in court today were wrong, and, through my faith in God, I am working to set things right. My guilty plea and agreement to cooperate with the Special Counsel's Office reflect a decision I made in the best interests of my family and of our country. I accept full responsibility for my actions."
...does NOT fit with "not guilty". Either Flynn perjured himself when e plead guilty to multiple counts...or he perjured himself when he attempted to withdraw is pleas.

It is not the judge's job to take it back up himself as prosecutor, especially due to political animosity towards Trump and his administration.
Again, you're lying to yourself. Judge Sullivan is not prosecuting the case, he's judging the case on it merits...as he is sworn to do as a federal judge.

And again your moronic OPINION that Sullivan is "racist" simply because he happens to be a black judge...accomplishes nothing, other than identify YOU as a bigot.

No, I don't really believe he is a racist, but it is just as wrong to accuse him of racism as it is to accuse Trump of racism.
So you were LYING when you accused Sullivan of being a racist? Or, you are lying now? Which one?

Trump is a confirmed racist. That is not arguable. And people like you, i.e.bigots and racists, don't get to decide who is a bigot or racist. Sorry.

Some people may be convinced Trump is a racist just like other people may be convinced Sullivan is a racist, and they have their reasons. But that does not prove either of them are racist.
More ignorant, false-equivalence. Equating Judge Sullivan to Trump's 4 DECADE HISTORY OF DOCUMENTED RACISM...simply because Sullivan is a black man presiding over the fate of one of your white natty heroes....is just moronic, empty-headed "logic". Lemme guess...you're just a high school grad?

The ONLY people who "may be convinced that Sullivan is a racist"....are ignorant white nationalist bigots and racists...and NO ONE else.

I don't agree with your statements or your reasoning.
Who cares?

What matters is NOT whether (or not) you "agree" with me. What matters is only if you can articulate fact-based, coherent defenses of your own statements and opinions.

And you never can. Almost every argument you offer is a ignorant lie, or a racist, fauxnews conspiracy theory.
 
Nonsense. There was no misconduct by the FBI. There has only been gross misconduct and corruption from the AG (Barr). The prosecutor dropped Flynn's guilty pleas because he was a corrupt appointee of a corrupt Att. Gen, and everyone understands that. That's why literally THOUSANDS of former federal judges and prosecutors of BOTH parties have taken the extraordinary step to publicly condemn this AG for his corruption and professional misconduct.

What Judge Sullivan understands is this, from Flynn's Guilty Plea Bargain:



What Judge Sullivan understands is hat the following public statement given by Flynn to him (Sullivan) in court at the time that Flynn confirmed guilt:
...does NOT fit with "not guilty". Either Flynn perjured himself when e plead guilty to multiple counts...or he perjured himself when he attempted to withdraw is pleas.


Again, you're lying to yourself. Judge Sullivan is not prosecuting the case, he's judging the case on it merits...as he is sworn to do as a federal judge.

And again your moronic OPINION that Sullivan is "racist" simply because he happens to be a black judge...accomplishes nothing, other than identify YOU as a bigot.


So you were LYING when you accused Sullivan of being a racist? Or, you are lying now? Which one?

Trump is a confirmed racist. That is not arguable. And people like you, i.e.bigots and racists, don't get to decide who is a bigot or racist. Sorry.


More ignorant, false-equivalence. Equating Judge Sullivan to Trump's 4 DECADE HISTORY OF DOCUMENTED RACISM...simply because Sullivan is a black man presiding over the fate of one of your white natty heroes....is just moronic, empty-headed "logic". Lemme guess...you're just a high school grad?

The ONLY people who "may be convinced that Sullivan is a racist"....are ignorant white nationalist bigots and racists...and NO ONE else.


Who cares?

What matters is NOT whether (or not) you "agree" with me. What matters is only if you can articulate fact-based, coherent defenses of your own statements and opinions.

And you never can. Almost every argument you offer is a ignorant lie, or a racist, fauxnews conspiracy theory.

*Nonsense. There was no misconduct by the FBI.*

Exculpatory evidence was withheld, and that's a fact.
 
Nonsense. There was no misconduct by the FBI. There has only been gross misconduct and corruption from the AG (Barr). The prosecutor dropped Flynn's guilty pleas because he was a corrupt appointee of a corrupt Att. Gen, and everyone understands that. That's why literally THOUSANDS of former federal judges and prosecutors of BOTH parties have taken the extraordinary step to publicly condemn this AG for his corruption and professional misconduct.

Because of democrat obstruction Americans have been kept in the dark until recently about FBI misconduct in the Flynn case. That God that pressures and influence from new conservative judges are now forcing leftist officials to release the incriminating evidences they have been hiding, proven the FBI misconduct.

Explosive New Flynn Documents Show FBI Goal Was To 'Get Him Fired'

New documents filed under seal last week by the Department of Justice provide the clearest evidence yet that the investigation and subsequent prosecution of former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was a set-up from the beginning. Handwritten notes from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that had been inappropriately withheld from Flynn’s defense team for years show that a key goal of the agents investigating Flynn was “to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.”


Someone needs to bring Sullivan up to speed on all of these newly uncovered facts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom