• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Black Judge in Flynn case continues to defy higher court order to drop the flawed case

Like I said earlier, I don't think Sullivan is any more a racist than Trump is but if democrats insist on claiming Trump is a racist without logical evidence then I suggest to them that Sullivan can also be called a racist by their loose standards of judgment.

Moronic argument.

You believe Judge Sullivan is a racist because he is black. You've made that clear. That doesn't make him a racist. But it does say a lot about you.

Trump is a documented racist with a history of blatant racism dating back AT LEAST 45 years. Only a moron would even suggest equivalence between Judge Sullivan and Trump.
 
Will an American judge defy the law to illegally and immorally pursue a political agenda? Obviously.

What is his motivation? To please democrats? To further vent his vengeful wrath against an innocent victim he despises? Congress needs to impeach this lawless bozo.

Michael Flynn Case: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case | National Review

Judge Emmett Sullivan refuses to roll over on DC Circuit Flynn ruling. Asks for En Banc hearing before the Appellate Court. If denied, it likely ends. If accepted, this could go on for some time.


Democrats falsely claim Trump is prejudiced against blacks, even though they have no actual evidence to support that felonious claim. However, it looks like this clown of a judge must be prejudiced against whites. Can we not safely draw that conclusion from the facts?

What does the color of the judge have to do with anything?
 
Taking the matters into his own hands as substitute prosecutor himself is not something condoned by any rule of judicial conduct.

Have you yet explained why you wrote such a racist Thread Title?
 
Whites form the majority of the American population, but some low IQ people think that is racist. As a general rule whites do better in school as a group than do blacks, and some people think that is racist. As a rule a larger percentage of black children are from broken homes than are white children and some people think that is racist. As a general rule more blacks hate cops for unjust reasons than do whites and some people think that is racist. As a general rule more whites have accumulated a greater amount of wealth through hard work, responsible work ethics and sacrifice than have blacks and some people think that is racist.

"Racist" is a term which has lost its normal meaning and taken on new perverted meanings in the last several decades. Just because whites have a higher degree of success than blacks on average is not evil, although evil could be involved, but calling whites racist just because blacks seem to lag behind in some areas is stupid.

Did he say that out loud? Thanks for removing all doubt.
 
Nobody can justly deny this case is not about justice but is about partisan politics. All sorts of criminal wrongdoings have been given passes from prosecution on technicalities, so when chasrges are not dropped on an innocent man you know there is something crooked going on behind the scenes.

Appeals court shows skepticism about forcing lower court to drop Flynn case | WLNS 6 News

Judge Neomi Rao asked Beth Wilkinson, who appeared as counsel on behalf of Sullivan, what Gleeson’s appointment signified, since many have leveled the criticism that his involvement in the case is tainted by politics. Days before Sullivan announced his involvement, Gleeson co-authored an op-ed in The Washington Post criticizing the Justice Department’s decision to drop Flynn’s charges.

Innocent man? His own mouth and brain formed the words..."Guilty your honor"
 
Whites form the majority of the American population, but some low IQ people think that is racist. As a general rule whites do better in school as a group than do blacks, and some people think that is racist. As a rule a larger percentage of black children are from broken homes than are white children and some people think that is racist. As a general rule more blacks hate cops for unjust reasons than do whites and some people think that is racist. As a general rule more whites have accumulated a greater amount of wealth through hard work, responsible work ethics and sacrifice than have blacks and some people think that is racist.

"Racist" is a term which has lost its normal meaning and taken on new perverted meanings in the last several decades. Just because whites have a higher degree of success than blacks on average is not evil, although evil could be involved, but calling whites racist just because blacks seem to lag behind in some areas is stupid.

So, you are unashamedly racist. I get it.
 
Once again, your argument fails because it is built upon a completely false premise. Judge Sullivan is not "trying" the case

Then what the hell is he doing by refusing to drop the case that the prosecutor and his boss have dropped. Of course he has no business taking up the prosecution of Flynn when the state has dropped the charges. He shows himself to be a corrupted partisan hack crook.
 
Well, ok. That's not what happened.

He appealed the writ of mandamus to the full circuit, and it was accepted.

He doesn't have to look far in DC to find a lot of crooks in the judicial system just as partisan and corrupt as he is. To hell with crooked partisanship. He proves himself to be crookedly motivated by political bias in a case he should have dropped according to long-standing judicial policies and ethics.
 
Moronic argument.

You believe Judge Sullivan is a racist because he is black. You've made that clear. That doesn't make him a racist. But it does say a lot about you.

Trump is a documented racist with a history of blatant racism dating back AT LEAST 45 years. Only a moron would even suggest equivalence between Judge Sullivan and Trump.

No, I don't believe Sullivan is a racist, but I remind those intent on calling Trump a racist that there is far more evidence Sullivan is a racist than there is that Trump is a racist.
 
What does the color of the judge have to do with anything?

What does color have to do with Black Lives Matter inflammatory rhetoric these days? Almost everything, although focus on racial preferences are not to be commended. Why mention the color of the judge? Because leftists who have framed Flynn for a crime he did not commit clearly hate Trump for ungodly reason and support BLM racist narratives slandering Trump and white people. Do these people trying to unjustly lynch Flynn love BLM and hate Trump, cops and white people? Maybe. I think there may be a connection.
 
Have you yet explained why you wrote such a racist Thread Title?

his recent threads and comments about apes and baboons tell us everything.

the only question is what made him this way. parents or an event (like a stolen girlfriend/sports position/job). or maybe insecurity?
 
So, you are unashamedly racist. I get it.

Leftists never accepted the scientific research which went into the report "The Bell Curve." They do not like truths they find inconvenient.
 
his recent threads and comments about apes and baboons tell us everything.

the only question is what made him this way. parents or an event (like a stolen girlfriend/sports position/job). or maybe insecurity?

Take my advice. Never argue with an evolutionist professor if he insists you are an ape. He likely cannot help himself. He probably sucked up all the evolution crap without question when he was in school and is now incapable of seeing why he is wrong. Leftist morons feel free to call me an ape but they lose their composure if I suggest they are baboons.
 
What does color have to do with Black Lives Matter inflammatory rhetoric these days? Almost everything, although focus on racial preferences are not to be commended. Why mention the color of the judge? Because leftists who have framed Flynn for a crime he did not commit clearly hate Trump for ungodly reason and support BLM racist narratives slandering Trump and white people. Do these people trying to unjustly lynch Flynn love BLM and hate Trump, cops and white people? Maybe. I think there may be a connection.

Your fever dreams bear no relation to reality.
 
I wonder if, when Sullivan is finally out of options and dismisses the case, or when it is taken out of his hands entirely, will he suffer any consequences for his prolonging the trial?

Can Flynn bring suit against Sullivan for mental anguish and judicial malfeasance? Probably not. Too bad.
 
Your fever dreams bear no relation to reality.
Your reality has little resemblance to this planet.

I wonder if, when Sullivan is finally out of options and dismisses the case, or when it is taken out of his hands entirely, will he suffer any consequences for his prolonging the trial? Can Flynn bring suit against Sullivan for mental anguish and judicial malfeasance? Probably not. Too bad.
In theory, Judge Sullivan could be impeached for violation of his oath of office. I doubt it happens.
 
I wonder if, when Sullivan is finally out of options and dismisses the case, or when it is taken out of his hands entirely, will he suffer any consequences for his prolonging the trial?

Can Flynn bring suit against Sullivan for mental anguish and judicial malfeasance? Probably not. Too bad.
No, you can't sue a judge for ruling against you.
 
I wonder if, when Sullivan is finally out of options and dismisses the case, or when it is taken out of his hands entirely, will he suffer any consequences for his prolonging the trial?

Can Flynn bring suit against Sullivan for mental anguish and judicial malfeasance? Probably not. Too bad.

Democrats are like Hitler's Nazi supporters in Germany. They don't give a damn about people outside their approved Nazi circles and believe all laws are enforceable only by members of the Nazi Party and for the benefit of the Nazi Party. The Nazi Party, also, is not to be bound by the laws which others are to be brutally oppressed under.

Don't elect these proud oppressors in 2020. Vote republican.
 
Democrats are like Hitler's Nazi supporters in Germany. They don't give a damn about people outside their approved Nazi circles and believe all laws are enforceable only by members of the Nazi Party and for the benefit of the Nazi Party. The Nazi Party, also, is not to be bound by the laws which others are to be brutally oppressed under.

Don't elect these proud oppressors in 2020. Vote republican.

boring
 
Democrats are like Hitler's Nazi supporters in Germany. They don't give a damn about people outside their approved Nazi circles and believe all laws are enforceable only by members of the Nazi Party and for the benefit of the Nazi Party. The Nazi Party, also, is not to be bound by the laws which others are to be brutally oppressed under.

Don't elect these proud oppressors in 2020. Vote republican.
You still have not explained why you used a racist thread title.
 
I protest the imbalance of leftist news media which emphasizes the word "white" in reports and avoids the word "black" for e=reasons which cannot be explained apart from an obvious intend to inflame blacks against whites. Was race mentioned in the Charlottesville vehicular murder? I remember seeing the words "white nationalists" and "white supremacy" but not the words "black protesters." So, did the driver drive into a mob of white protesters? It may not be clear since the word "black" was not used in most reports, just the repeated use of the word "white" or "whites."

Take the news reports of the vehicular murder in Seattle recently. What was reported? Here are key words from this report:

Bone-chilling video shows speeding car hit 2 BLM protesters on freeway in Seattle — RT USA News

"...speeding car hit 2 BLM protesters...

A speeding car, which drove around vehicles blocking a road in Seattle in an area where a Black Lives Matter protest was taking place, has hit two women, killing one. ...

The graphic video shows a white car maneuvering around a couple of vehicles blocking the road and hitting the protesters in the process. ...

The white Jaguar reportedly stopped about half a mile away from the scene. ...

The suspect is a 27-year-old man from Seattle, who is facing multiple felony charges. ...

The US city has been gripped by anti-racism protests since the May killing of black man George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers. ..."

So what were we not told in the news article? That the felon who deliberately mowed down the protesters with his car was black.

You looked up the judge to see what color he is?
 
Back
Top Bottom