Billionaire tells other Billionaires to relax

[Wings]

Disagree and so does the constitution's preamble.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[note 1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.​

It doesn't end with ...and to ensure to put all this in the back seat to pinch penny's.

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. Hence the 16th amendment.

I don’t want to pinch pennies but if you think the government (federal) is being operated at an efficient level then..... I don’t know what to say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[poweRob]

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. Hence the 16th amendment.

I don’t want to pinch pennies but if you think the government (federal) is being operated at an efficient level then..... I don’t know what to say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Im wide open. Please decipher definition and.inrent.

 

[Wings]

Im wide open. Please decipher definition and.inrent.

The Preamble serves solely as an introduction, and does not assign powers to the federal government,[3] nor does it provide specific limitations on government action. Due to the Preamble's limited nature, no court has ever used it as a decisive factor in case adjudication,[4] except as regards frivolous litigation.[5]


Preamble to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

Pretty straight forward.


One of the underlying principles of the USA is “Pursuit of happiness”. You are not entitled to others “riches” in that pursuit.

There is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from being successful in the US.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[poweRob]

The Preamble serves solely as an introduction, and does not assign powers to the federal government,[3] nor does it provide specific limitations on government action. Due to the Preamble's limited nature, no court has ever used it as a decisive factor in case adjudication,[4] except as regards frivolous litigation.[5]


Preamble to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

Pretty straight forward.


One of the underlying principles of the USA is “Pursuit of happiness”. You are not entitled to others “riches” in that pursuit.

There is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from being successful in the US.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The preamble states the entire intent of the constitution. That many on the right likes to dismiss it is telling. The rest is you straw-manning an argument I had not made.

 

[Moot]

I'm sure he probably pulled that percentage out of the air to make a point but...

Wall Street Democratic donors warn the party: We’ll sit out, or back Trump, if you nominate Elizabeth Warren

‘She’s going to hurt me’: Democratic Wall Street donors threaten to back Donald Trump if Elizabeth Warren heads party

Bankers "Confirm Warren's Whole Worldview" by Saying They'll Donate to Trump to Defeat Anti-Wall Street Senator in 2020​

Boy, they really don't like Warren, do they? That's troublesome...especially if she gets the nomination. I think the wheels might be coming off her campaign because she doesn't have a plan for health insurance.

Which is good for Bernie.

 

[poweRob]

Boy, they really don't like Warren, do they? That's troublesome...especially if she gets the nomination. I think the wheels might be coming off her campaign because she doesn't have a plan for health insurance.

Which is good for Bernie.

Warren's plan is Medicare for All. Same as Bernie's. The only thing she hasn't done is put up her financing plan of M4A which is apparently coming.

Warren promises to release Medicare for All funding plan soon​

She basically adopted Bernie's healthcare plan. I'm curious if she's going to also adopt his funding plan?

 

[Moot]

The Preamble serves solely as an introduction, and does not assign powers to the federal government,[3] nor does it provide specific limitations on government action. Due to the Preamble's limited nature, no court has ever used it as a decisive factor in case adjudication,[4] except as regards frivolous litigation.[5]

Preamble to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

Pretty straight forward.


One of the underlying principles of the USA is “Pursuit of happiness”. You are not entitled to others “riches” in that pursuit.

There is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from being successful in the US.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The courts might not have used the Preamble as a "decisive factor in case adjudication"...but they have used it in case law...

Cites to case law relating to the Preamble - The Federal Government must consider the impacts of Federal actions on posterity; Case cites:

U.S. Constitution Preamble, Cites to Case Law​

'Pursuit of happiness' was originally 'pursuit of property' and property used to mean slaves.

And the government can't guarantee you will find happiness...it can only protect your right to pursue it.

 

[Moot]

Warren's plan is Medicare for All. Same as Bernie's. The only thing she hasn't done is put up her financing plan of M4A which is apparently coming.

Warren promises to release Medicare for All funding plan soon​

She basically adopted Bernie's healthcare plan. I'm curious if she's going to also adopt his funding plan?

She's getting a lot of **** for bragging about her M4A plan and not having any details on it by now. People are beginning to wonder about her. Biden, Sanders and Klobuchar have all commented on it. I wouldn't be surprised if she adopted one of Bernie's funding plan ideas. Apparently, he has five or six to choose from.

 

[poweRob]

She's getting a lot of **** for bragging about her M4A plan and not having any details on it by now. People are beginning to wonder about her. Biden, Sanders and Klobuchar have all commented on it. I wouldn't be surprised if she adopted one of Bernie's funding plan ideas. Apparently, he has five or six to choose from.

She's catching a lot of **** because she's the front runner now. Aside from Bernie, I don't think any of them have put out much in details. It seems to be the new thing to hold back on details so that your opponents don't start fabricating slams on the minutia keeping you on the constant defense. I don't agree with this tactic of withholding details but I see what's happening.

 

[Wings]

The courts might not have used the Preamble as a "decisive factor in case adjudication"...but they have used it in case law...

Cites to case law relating to the Preamble - The Federal Government must consider the impacts of Federal actions on posterity; Case cites:

U.S. Constitution Preamble, Cites to Case Law​

'Pursuit of happiness' was originally 'pursuit of property' and property used to mean slaves.

And the government can't guarantee you will find happiness...it can only protect your right to pursue it.

I agree completely.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Wings]

The preamble states the entire intent of the constitution. That many on the right likes to dismiss it is telling. The rest is you straw-manning an argument I had not made.

I didn’t strawman anything. You asked what I thought the preamble meant/intended. I provided a much more articulate writing than I could put together myself.

The constitution doesn’t guarantee you happiness or success only the opportunity to seek it.

Taxing the rich serves no purpose for the less rich as defined by the powers and limitations of the constitution.

So your argument is moot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Moot]

Warren's plan is Medicare for All. Same as Bernie's. The only thing she hasn't done is put up her financing plan of M4A which is apparently coming.

Warren promises to release Medicare for All funding plan soon​

She basically adopted Bernie's healthcare plan. I'm curious if she's going to also adopt his funding plan?

She says she's not going to raise taxes on the middle class...and wants to raise taxes on the wealthy. I think that means she wants the rich to pay for the nations healthcare. Maybe that's why they hate her.

 

[poweRob]

She says she's not going to raise taxes on the middle class...and wants to raise taxes on the wealthy. I think that means she wants the rich to pay for the nations healthcare. Maybe that's why they hate her.

She has been weasel wording kind of about healthcare and taxes. Only because she doesn't want to provide the GOP an easy commercial of her saying, "I will raise your taxes" and of course they will then cut out the part of her saying "but your take home will be bigger because we eliminate healthcare premium deductions from your paycheck."

 

[Moot]

She has been weasel wording kind of about healthcare and taxes. Only because she doesn't want to provide the GOP an easy commercial of her saying, "I will raise your taxes" and of course they will then cut out the part of her saying "but your take home will be bigger because we eliminate healthcare premium deductions from your paycheck."

Her weasel words are giving her Dem competitors talking points and she has to beat them first. Klobuchar is taking the ball and running with it. Keep your eye on Klobuchar...she's gaining momentum with moderates.

 

[poweRob]

Her weasel words are giving her Dem competitors talking points and she has to beat them first. Klobuchar is taking the ball and running with it. Keep your eye on Klobuchar...she's gaining momentum with moderates.

God I hope not.

 

[Moot]

God I hope not.

Bernie is moving up in the polls, too. But he needs to expand his base which it doesn't look like he has, yet.

 

[poweRob]

Bernie is moving up in the polls, too. But he needs to expand his base which it doesn't look like he has, yet.

I think i saw he had made great i roads with the black support.

 

[Moot]

I think i saw he had made great i roads with the black support.

He needs older people, too. If you look at his crowds, they're almost all young white faces and many of them are the same supporters from 2016.