• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Cosby Found Guilty

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,252
Reaction score
102,437
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Bill Cosby Found Guilty Of All Charges In Sexual Assault Retrial

BC-US-Bill-Cosby-IMG-jpg-630x449.jpg


April 26, 2018

A Pennsylvania jury has found Bill Cosby guilty on three counts of aggravated indecent assault, setting the comic legend up for the possibility of years of imprisonment for drugging and sexually violating a woman 14 years ago on a couch in his Cheltenham, Pa. home. Cosby initially faced sexual assault charges in court last June but jurors could not reach a unanimous decision after 52 hours of deliberation. The judge declared it a mistrial. This time around, the seven men and five women on the panel sat in the jury box of the Montgomery County Courthouse and listened to more than two weeks of testimony from 25 witnesses. Some cried on the stand recounting how Cosby attacked them while they were in drug-induced stupors, and others attempted to discredit main accuser Andrea Constand by detailing instances of supposed deceit and inconsistencies.

"This case is about trust," Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele told jurors in his opening remarks. "This case is about betrayal, and that betrayal leading to the sexual assault of a woman named Andrea Constand." Constand, the only Cosby accuser whose case has triggered criminal charges, took the stand for the prosecution over two days, as she did during the first trial. In addition to Constand, five women who have never before confronted Cosby in a criminal courtroom took the witness stand. They told the jury that the entertainer drugged and molested them in the 1980s, stories that first came to light after prosecutors reopened Cosby's criminal case in 2015. That led more than 60 women to lodge sexual misconduct allegations against the television icon once known as "America's Dad." "You remember, don't you, Mr. Cosby?" said accuser Chelan Lasha from the stand, locking eyes with Cosby, who has remained largely impassive throughout the trial.

Judge Steven O’Neill didn’t announce a date for sentencing, but state law requires it within 100 days of a conviction. Cosby, 80, could face up to 30 years in prison.
 
He's 80 years old, rich and it was a long time ago. I'd be surprised if he got significant time.

I also wonder how much the whole #metoo thing has to do with this. I can't believe the evidence presented is significantly different from the 1st trial (though I really haven't followed the case)
 
Bill Cosby Found Guilty Of All Charges In Sexual Assault Retrial
Judge Steven O’Neill didn’t announce a date for sentencing, but state law requires it within 100 days of a conviction. Cosby, 80, could face up to 30 years in prison.

And he deserves every minute of it.

It's so doggone sad - I dearly loved his comedy routines long before he became a fixture on TV, and I thought the world of him. But he had feet of clay, and his sins came back to haunt him.

And - DP being a political debate site - y'all do realize he was strongly conservative, right?
 
And he deserves every minute of it.

It's so doggone sad - I dearly loved his comedy routines long before he became a fixture on TV, and I thought the world of him. But he had feet of clay, and his sins came back to haunt him.

And - DP being a political debate site - y'all do realize he was strongly conservative, right?

I'm glad that justice was served, but I am saddened too. Like you I once admired him for his comedy. He was funny without the nasty edge that you get with a lot of comedians. In the 80's I gave my husband a copy of his book, Fatherhood. People are complex, so it's possible that he was or is in part, the man I admired. It's just that the other part of him is vile. The good doesn't make up for the bad, and it seems that the bad overshadows the good.
 
I would love to be in the courtroom when the verdict was handed down. I heard he yelled profanities. Could you imagine hearing fat albert use the same words. And at one time he was America's dad(Dr. Huxtable)...:roll:
 
I don't think justice was served here. Recollections of what happened after 14 years are pretty suspect. Almost all research studies show this to be the case. Our brains tend to fill in gaps and make the story the way we feel.. rather than what actually happened.

And I don't think its justice to parade a bunch of other people.. who have come out of the woodwork to accuse him.. ..they have nothing to do with THIS crime.. and its terribly prejudicial.
 
He's 80 years old, rich and it was a long time ago. I'd be surprised if he got significant time.

I also wonder how much the whole #metoo thing has to do with this. I can't believe the evidence presented is significantly different from the 1st trial (though I really haven't followed the case)

He should get life. The fact that he was able to rape women for 50 years with no repercussions, is why he doesn't deserve another day of freedom. **** him.
 
Bill Cosby Found Guilty Of All Charges In Sexual Assault Retrial

BC-US-Bill-Cosby-IMG-jpg-630x449.jpg




Judge Steven O’Neill didn’t announce a date for sentencing, but state law requires it within 100 days of a conviction. Cosby, 80, could face up to 30 years in prison.

Ill say the same thing here i did in the other thread

Sadly no surprise here. Eventually when your accusers hit a certain number and thier stories are similar and never change it starts to paint a picture. Of course always innocent till proven guilty just saying, theres no shock here now.

It was shock many many moons ago and sadly his once great persona, legacy and history of work will now be tarnished.
For me it started with Fat Albert and Picture Pages.

At least there is SOME justice for SOME victims now.
 
I don't think justice was served here. Recollections of what happened after 14 years are pretty suspect. Almost all research studies show this to be the case. Our brains tend to fill in gaps and make the story the way we feel.. rather than what actually happened.

And I don't think its justice to parade a bunch of other people.. who have come out of the woodwork to accuse him.. ..they have nothing to do with THIS crime.. and its terribly prejudicial.

These other women who testified didn't just come out of the woodwork, they were just 5 of the many women accusing Cosby. Their stories have been know for quite a while.
 
I don't think justice was served here. Recollections of what happened after 14 years are pretty suspect. Almost all research studies show this to be the case. Our brains tend to fill in gaps and make the story the way we feel.. rather than what actually happened.

And I don't think its justice to parade a bunch of other people.. who have come out of the woodwork to accuse him.. ..they have nothing to do with THIS crime.. and its terribly prejudicial.

He admitted to drugging women so that he could abuse them. The world is supposed to show reverence for him?
 
These other women who testified didn't just come out of the woodwork, they were just 5 of the many women accusing Cosby. Their stories have been know for quite a while.

Really? Why wasn;t Cosby brought up on charges from these women then? Yes.. their "stories" have been known for quite a while.. which certainly gives time for copy catting.



.
 
Really? Why wasn;t Cosby brought up on charges from these women then? Yes.. their "stories" have been known for quite a while.. which certainly gives time for copy catting.



.

This current charge covers only 1 woman. Some of the others have statutes that have expired, however there are more that could still go after him. I doubt they would, this one case seems to be enough.
 
He admitted to drugging women so that he could abuse them. The world is supposed to show reverence for him?

Where does he admit to drugging woman so he can abuse them? I have never seen where he pled guilty in this case. If he pled guilty.. why did he have a trial then?

this has nothing to do with showing reverence.

I question the justice of bringing a fellow up on charges years (more than a decade) after it happened.. when the supposed attacker was WELL KNOWN to the victim. All studies show that recollection of events that long ago are questionable.

Witnesses can absorb new information that contaminates their memories by talking to each other or seeing media coverage of the crime as well. Sometimes, a person can even unwittingly corrupt their own memories by speculating about how the event might have transpired. Loftus has spoken to people who witnessed car wrecks and were certain about which direction both vehicles were traveling when the accident happened. But investigators discovered that based on the routes both drivers were taking, the witness’s version of events was impossible. It could be that the witness made assumptions based on where the cars came to rest after colliding, she says. “Your own thoughts can act like external information and you can distort your own memory that way.”

https://www.popsci.com/accurate-memories-from-eyewitnesses#page-3


And I question the justice of bringing up testimony that is not directly rated to THIS particular crime being prosecuted.
 
I don't think justice was served here. Recollections of what happened after 14 years are pretty suspect.

I don't buy that shtick. I don't think any woman ever forgets the trauma of a rape.
 
This current charge covers only 1 woman. Some of the others have statutes that have expired, however there are more that could still go after him. I doubt they would, this one case seems to be enough.

Exactly. So when the crimes supposedly happened.. they did not seek prosecution. So now its a case of jumping on the band wagon.

Oh it will likely get worse now ... because after the conviction.. the ability to extort money from him will be that much greater.
 
I don't buy that shtick. I don't think any woman ever forgets the trauma of a rape.

Which is scientifically incorrect. In fact there have been a plethora of men that have been convicted of rape based on victim testimony.. and later exonerated when the actually DNA or other physical evidence PROVES that it was not the person in question.

Mark Denny, who spent nearly three decades behind bars for a rape and robbery he didn’t comment, was exonerated Wednesday after an investigation by the Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office determined he had nothing to do with the crime.
The rape victim, whose eyes were covered for some of the attack, didn’t initially identify him when shown a photo array, but picked him out of a lineup a couple days later.

Her testimony was vague at trial, and she also wasn’t sure whether there were three or four assailants, according to the Brooklyn DA’s Office.

The Innocence Project took the case to the Kings County District Attorney’s Conviction Review Unit, which ultimately determined Denny wasn’t at the Burger King that night.

“After a lengthy and extensive investigation into this horrific case, I have concluded that the cause of justice requires that we vacate the conviction of Mr. Denny,” Acting Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez said in a statement.

“Expert analysis of his identification, an examination of the rest of the evidence and multiple accounts from witnesses and co-defendants all indicate that he was not present when this terrible crime was committed exactly 30 years ago.”
 
He should have been stopped long ago, long before he was 80. He should pay a price for all the pain and anguish he has caused others. There is no way all the women are lying.

That's the problem.. lying requires you knowing what you are saying is incorrect.

Research shows that peoples recollections can be vivid and full of detail.. and the person absolutely believe its the truth..

And be absolutely incorrect.
 
That's the problem.. lying requires you knowing what you are saying is incorrect.

Research shows that peoples recollections can be vivid and full of detail.. and the person absolutely believe its the truth..

And be absolutely incorrect.

Your mind doesn't make up being raped. That is something a person would remember.
 
Where does he admit to drugging woman so he can abuse them? I have never seen where he pled guilty in this case. If he pled guilty.. why did he have a trial then?

this has nothing to do with showing reverence.

I question the justice of bringing a fellow up on charges years (more than a decade) after it happened.. when the supposed attacker was WELL KNOWN to the victim. All studies show that recollection of events that long ago are questionable.



https://www.popsci.com/accurate-memories-from-eyewitnesses#page-3


And I question the justice of bringing up testimony that is not directly rated to THIS particular crime being prosecuted.

All of your concerns will likely be addressed when he appeals.

Cosby admitted that his use of drugs was illegal, in the civil suit he settled out of court. Anytime a man plies a woman with drugs before sexual activity occurs, people have a right to be highly suspicious.
 
I almost feel sorry for the filthy pig.Its his own fault tho.He is so damn dumb its pathetic.If he had run for any political posistion as a Democrat nothing would have happened.That disgusting Bill Clinton raped and raped and they adored him.
 
Bounce TV has dropped the Cosby Show from its schedule.Maybe MSNBC will pick it up.MSNBC has no shame.Put the Cosby Show on right after Joy Reid.
 
That is a neat trick this if you dont get him the first time then hold a new trial with rules that more favor the prosecution so that maybe a jury will finally do their jobs and rule the way the state wants them to rule.
 
Back
Top Bottom