Yep. Again, you fail to understand the actual claims made by climate scientists about hurricanes -- even when I point them out to you repeatedly. Hmmmm.
:roll:
Yes, I've seen deniers latch onto Zwally's work; Zwally himself was worried that would happen. (
https://www.mediamatters.org/resear...ntist-warned-deniers-would-distort-his/206612).
As mentioned in other discussions here rather recently, Zwally (who is a respected researcher) is using less accurate measures of measurement. And again, I pointed out that the bigger concern is the loss of ice shelves. We don't know yet if that's going to happen, but events like the collapse of Larsen Ice Shelf C is not a good sign.
Anyway... so far, that means you have failed to refute the following impacts of AGW in recent years:
• more extreme weather events (heat waves, high precipitation events, cold snaps etc)
• hurricanes that are larger, more intense, travel slower, and produce larger storm surges
• larger and more intense heat waves
• forest fires happening in unprecedented areas (e.g. the northern parts of Sweden... which are in the Arctic Circle, by the way)
• loss of ice/glacial masses in Greenland, Himalayas, the Arctic etc
• loss of fresh water
• rapid rise in sea levels
• acidification of oceans
• massive loss of coral reefs
• rapid increase in CO2, CH4 and other GHG concentrations in the atmosphere
• rapid increase in global temperatures
• more extreme weather events
• permafrost starting to melt
Just to name a few.