• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barr, suspecially quick conclusion

Sand Castle

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
7,140
Reaction score
3,673
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.
 
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.

"suspecially"?
 
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.

Typical Supreme court turnaround
Using a comprehensive and thoughtful review:

Q: How long does it take the Court to act, once a petition has been filed? A: On the average, about six weeks. Once a petition has been filed, the other party has 30 days within which to file a response brief, or, in some cases waive his/ her right to respond
 
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.

Hmm... what of those who had neither documents nor evidence and yet reached the conclusion that there was both collusion and obstruction?
 
Sorry, Suspiciously

Castle;1069861255]Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.[/QUOTE]
 
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.

Did you expect anything else from a Trump hack? These need to be made public.
 
Did you expect anything else from a Trump hack? These need to be made public.

I was never on board with this investigation in the first place, but god help us all if they don't make this public.



Soon.
 
Note that Mueller found no evidence of collusion, but Barr also clearly stated that in the matter of obstruction, he did NOT exonerate Trump-despite Trump lying to that effect. Again (like that's a surprise).
Although I have to concede that Teflon Don escaped this time, there are still legal matters to pursue. This is not a done deal yet, so Trump's celebrations may be somewhat premature.
 
Did you expect anything else from a Trump hack? These need to be made public.

Especially when Barr politically embellished Meuller's report.

I never thought Trump would be found guilty of the Russia connection.

But, never expected Barr would create the appearance of Trump being innocent completely with Meuller findings.
 
Pretty especious. I got that squinty eye thing going right away.
 
Especially when Barr politically embellished Meuller's report.

I never thought Trump would be found guilty of the Russia connection.

But, never expected Barr would create the appearance of Trump being innocent completely with Meuller findings.

Well how did it appear to you?
 
What I find odd is that Barr summarized 485 pages into 4 pages, while he wrote 19 pages about Mueller's investigation while he was a private citizen and knew next to nothing about Mueller's findings.
 
Pretty especious. I got that squinty eye thing going right away.

Now I see why the Democrats were freaking out about Barr appointment.
As for Rosenstein, he did not want to end up like McCabe full career no pension.
 
Now I see why the Democrats were freaking out about Barr appointment.
As for Rosenstein, he did not want to end up like McCabe full career no pension.

Just think, though. If Barr had been appointed SC, the whole thing would've been wrapped up the very next day.
 
What I find odd is that Barr summarized 485 pages into 4 pages, while he wrote 19 pages about Mueller's investigation while he was a private citizen and knew next to nothing about Mueller's findings.

That's the only thing that jumped out at me too. Almost 3 years and 485 pages summed up into 4 pages? That seems odd. But when the full report is made public, maybe it will make sense.
 
That's the only thing that jumped out at me too. Almost 3 years and 485 pages summed up into 4 pages? That seems odd. But when the full report is made public, maybe it will make sense.

Not going to happen, unless it get's leaked. Barr will fight it tooth and nail.
 
You don't think Mueller summarized the investigations findings? Strange...looks like grasping at straws.
 
If Barr is misrepresenting the report, and Mueller is a man of integrity, we'll hear about it from Mueller.

But at this point, to believe Barr is misrepresenting the report is an exercise in willful wishful thinking.

And what is it you wish is true? That the President of the United States conspired with our foremost geopolitical foe. Why do you wish that's true?
 
Not going to happen, unless it get's leaked. Barr will fight it tooth and nail.

Why would he? You're certain that he will. Why? Details.
 
It probably will be, in due time.

As he said in his letter, there's a lot which needs to be redacted by law before it can be released, and that will take some time.
 
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.

Barr simply released what boils down to a 4 page partisan political document. I am anxious to see where Rod Rosenstein goes after the Justice Dept which he is leaving, apparently. Assuming Rosenstein did have something to do with some of the gibberish in Barr's 4 page letter, it would appear that Rod considers recovering his Republican credentials more important than anything else. Might make some sense considering how "conflicted" Rosenstein has been. Wrote the Comey letter, then complained about having been used by Trump in the whole Comey letter affair. Please Rod, grow up. You got played. Deal with it. He got all fired up early in his tenure as Deputy AG and appears to be regretting it now. I wish he would think more about being an American than being a Republican. That does not appear to be in the cards.

While some are complaining that Mueller should have left no ambiguity in the Obstruction part of his investigation, without knowing which aspects of Obstruction he actually investigated and without having interviewed the President in an effort to determine State of Mind, I just don't see that he left himself a choice. Barr however, stepped way over the line in his letter turning it into a partisan political document.

The Conspiracy issue for a Prosecutor is an issue of whether he can connect all the dots from one end of the Conspiracy to the other. Barring that and without RICO, he can't make a case. He simply did not have the flippers that would make credible witnesses. Stunning that stone cold mafia hit men make better, more credible witnesses at trial than political operatives.

Since the entire Russian Interference probe started its life as a counter-intelligence investigation, not a criminal investigation what actually sits in that counter-intelligence bucket remains hidden from the American public's view.

Collusion is an Impeachment issue. Is not an issue for Indictment to Federal Prosecution for ANYBODY. As such it is interesting that MSM and the Trumpets continue to prattle on about "No Collusion" when it simply was not in the cards for Mueller to determine Collusion through Prosecution in the first place.

Mueller at the end of the day and still without benefit of having the actual Mueller report comes out of this so far in way better shape than Barr (clearly now a political hack), Rosenstein (desperate to recover his Republican credentials), Sessions (ether Elmer Fudd or Mr McGoo, take your pick) and Fat Donald who has brought us the most corrupt and unscrupulous and self-aggransizing Presidency and Administration in history.
 
Last edited:
As he said in his letter, there's a lot which needs to be redacted by law before it can be released, and that will take some time.

Yeah, due to like privacy and security concerns, I'm sure.
 
Following two years of investigations and indictments. Along with Trump's lies and appearance of obstruction,

Barr in 48 hours supposedly reads all documents and reviews all evidence and then exonerates Trump.

This has the appearance that Trump's appointee had made his conclusion in his job interview.

And Rosenstein made his when Trump allowed him to keep his job and pension.

You guys are just too funny. Don't you remember, just a few short months ago Rosenstein was your hero because he supposedly was asking about invoking the 25th amendment? Now you say he was in Trump's back pocket right from the beginning. And it wasn't Barr, it was Mueller himself who reported that there was no evidence of collusion, even though Russia tried. And, Mueller laid out the left's reasoning for Trump obstructing justice and the right's reasoning as to why he didn't, failing to find any evidence strong enough to raise past the level of reasonable doubt. Trump's actions can be interpretted in different ways, meaning there is no clear evidence of how to successfully interpret what Trump said and did.
 
Back
Top Bottom