• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry

Athanasius68 said:
Sorry-- after 2 years of Trump is a Russian stooge or Trump is a Russian asset or Trump is a traitor, let us not rewrite history and suggest the Trump/Russia coordination piece was an afterthought. Indeed, if it had been an afterthought, there would be no justification to appoint Mueller.
Click to expand...

So lets deny what we can read or maybe some of us can't read and instead believe the political rhetoric. Ah-huh.
 
humbolt said:
Spying is spying. The context you place on it springs from you own imagination.

If Mueller disagreed with Barr, he had and has every opportunity to express it as was demonstrated already by his letter to Barr. That has nothing to do with any particular news source. It's now common knowledge by demonstration.
Click to expand...

Correct, spying is spying and is misapplied by Barr or Trump or any other Trump sycophant. Spying is not potential unauthorized surveillance which would be the correct term of art. Spying is out of context as the term spying is inexorably tied to the term espionage and Barr knows it though Trump might not. There is not an espionage issue of any sort at play as it relates to the FBI. The only role the FBI ever plays with regard to espionage is counter-espionage.

I have even less regard for Political Hacks in public office that know they are engaging in Political Hackery than I have for the dunce caps that don't even know any better and Barr is a political hack that knows better.

You can remain steeped in ignorance all you want to. Frankly it hardly matters to me unless you are a US Citizen and can actually vote in Elections....a scary thought.
 
jnug said:
Correct, spying is spying and is misapplied by Barr or Trump or any other Trump sycophant. Spying is not potential unauthorized surveillance which would be the correct term of art. Spying is out of context as the term spying is inexorably tied to the term espionage and Barr knows it though Trump might not. There is not an espionage issue of any sort at play as it relates to the FBI. The only role the FBI ever plays with regard to espionage is counter-espionage.

I have even less regard for Political Hacks in public office that know they are engaging in Political Hackery than I have for the dunce caps that don't even know any better and Barr is a political hack that knows better.

You can remain steeped in ignorance all you want to. Frankly it hardly matters to me unless you are a US Citizen and can actually vote in Elections....a scary thought.
Click to expand...

Again, spying is spying, whether It's "sanctioned" or not.

It sounds like you're on the losing end of things here, and you're angry about it. It might be more profitable for you to figure out exactly how you got all those lumps on your head than to yell at everyone else about them.

And I've been voting for 50 years, have forgotten more than you'll likely ever know, and I'm better looking, too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom