Homophilia belongs to the same cataloguing of necrophilia, [/quote[
False. Necrophilia involves a person who can't consent. Gay relationships don't.
False. Zoophilia involves a creature that can't consent. Gay relationships don't.
And again...false. Incest is most often committed as a crime against children, who by virtue of their rage, cannot consent.
The point is that all those sexual behaviours belong to the same cataloguing, with or without consent. Plus, incest not necessarily implies rape, thjere are brothers and sisters having sex without being children but adults consenting such kind of relationship.
So if the above situations all involve non-consent and garm and gay relationships do not, what's your basis, besides hatred and a desire to smear consenting adults who desire to live their lives in happiness, causing no one any harm, for equating them?
No harm? Sure, people who commit incest also cause no harm to others, people who commit bigamy do not harm others as well...but even when the parts involved consent to such kind of rel;ationship, such actions are illegal and inmoral.
False, and on the whole, hateful equivocation with no logical basis.
Why do you hide behind the word "hateful" every time somebody tells you that homosexuality is a negative behaviour? Don't play the victim here, nobody buys that silly strategic anymore.
Let me ask you something conqueror. How does allowing gay couples to live out their lives in happiness hurt you? How does allowing a gay man to receive care on his partner's health insurance hurt you? How does a child being raised by two able and loving parents who just happen to be the same gender hurt you?
Such happunes is not happines at all. For example, show me here a parent of a gay individual saying: "I'm proud that my son is gay". :lol:
You can hear that parents, family members and friends say "I understand him" but they never ever say that "they are proud" that the dude is gay. The only one who feels such kind of "pride" is the gay individual himself and his group of gays.
So, instead of pride, a gay individual brings shame and sadness to his family. So, don't tell me that gays harm nobody, such is not true, a family is hurt everytime a member of it becomes gay.
Now well, being gay is against the species, and we must protect our species, and for this reason children must be protected from gays so gays won't spread such a negative influence on them.
That kind of perversion in gays that you call "love" is not what the purpose of nature is about. I feel sorry for the children raised by gay couples, they live in a world different than others because society do not accept gays as some people think it does. For example you call gay to a straight man and he will feel offended, and the reason is because gays is mostly related to low moral and a wrong orientation.
Take note that straight people is "forced" to tolerate gays by law, but such don't apply as a voluntary step. You already have witnessed that gay marriage didn't pass in any state where it was in the ballot. You can witness that society says "no" to such marriage. Are you going to call "bigots" to the majorities because the majorities don't accept such kind of marriage?
Come on...