Bark
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 1,686
- Reaction score
- 263
- Location
- Houston, Tx
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Re: "assault weapon" vs Semi auto rifles
Why was the M-16 designed? Why was the m4 designed? My point is that if original intent was "FOR WAR" maybe it should stay there? Did the designers of those guns say, let's go out and make the best hunting rifle ever? No they are to take the stress out of operating them in very confused situations. Are they good for home defense, yes. So if mace and your fists if you got the brass. What I am saying is that there are alternatives that were not designed SPECIFICALLY with the battlefield in mind.
its stupid. sorry. You've been here more than a year: do you read the other posts?
AR 15s are issued by most major police departments-some are issuing surplus military M4s or M16s. The AR 15 is the single most versatile self defense weapon a homeowner or shop keeper can own. Claiming they are designed to kill mass numbers of people is so stupid as to render your opinion on any firearms subject worthless. If that was even remotely true, why are civilian police using them? Belt fed machine guns come closer to that claim. Many of the top civilian firearms instructors consider the AR 15 ideal for varied problems a home owner or shop keeper might encounter. These instructors have years of experience-the place I train is run by a guy who was first an MP in Vietnam during the Tet Offensive (among other things) and then director of the County Swat team (smaller villages and cities created a swat team by having each department dedicate an officer to it, and this man was head of it). Another instructor who supports AR 15s for civilian defense is this fellow
https://www.bravocompanymfg.com/gunfighters/frank_proctor.php
I own one of the rifles he designed for Windham Weaponry (the original Bushmaster Factory)
one of the best I own
https://www.windhamweaponry.com/fir...ber-rifle/way-of-the-gun-performance-carbine/
Why was the M-16 designed? Why was the m4 designed? My point is that if original intent was "FOR WAR" maybe it should stay there? Did the designers of those guns say, let's go out and make the best hunting rifle ever? No they are to take the stress out of operating them in very confused situations. Are they good for home defense, yes. So if mace and your fists if you got the brass. What I am saying is that there are alternatives that were not designed SPECIFICALLY with the battlefield in mind.