- Joined
- Feb 16, 2008
- Messages
- 10,443
- Reaction score
- 4,479
- Location
- Western NY and Geneva, CH
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
If by "complaining" you mean "making the same points they're making here," then -- yeah.
If by "complaining" you mean "making the same points they're making here," then -- yeah.
I think many people ignore the fact that she was on the company's dime when she was at Arlington cemetery. If the thread title was "Employee fired for acting like a dumbass while on the job" or "Employee fired for embarrassing the company while on a company trip" then the only thing people would be complaining about is the fact this story made the news.
People have been doing stupid crap since the dawn of man. The difference between stupid crap 100 years ago and stupid crap today is that today it's much more visible. People aren't getting dumber, we're just privy to more of their stupidity. That doesn't give us license to punish it everywhere it pops up.
Yeah, and people have been reaping the consequences of their stupid actions since the dawn of man as well. If something you do threatens your employers image, they're well within their rights to cut your ass loose.
People don't have a right to employment.
Semi-related generic response...I think many people ignore the fact that she was on the company's dime when she was at Arlington cemetery. If the thread title was "Employee fired for acting like a dumbass while on the job" or "Employee fired for embarrassing the company while on a company trip" then the only thing people would be complaining about is the fact this story made the news.
Behaving like a childish idiot isn't a crime, and any employer who fires her is looking at a pretty nasty first-amendment based wrongful termination suit.
I live in the US so I can do things like this and not fear retribution.
IIRC, the company was investigating, but she eventually resigned of her own choice. Supposedly.I think a lot of people are missing the reason she was disciplined (I haven't figured out yet if she was actually fired or resigned, I thought she resigned). She wasn't disciplined for protesting or doing something specifically that disrespected veterans. She was disciplined for showing poor judgement, whether it was disrespecting the veterans (which I don't believe she was really trying to do) or disrespecting authority (which she admits was what she was doing) and then posting evidence of that action on a public media outlet (which every single person out there that gives job advice will tell you never ever do). If we go by what she said was her reason for the photo, then the fact that she has another photo of her doing this just adds more against her. She is blatantly showing that she wants to disrespect authority even if there are good reasons for those signs, which she admits represents to her authority, to be in place. You add to that she was doing it in a place that is seen by many as sacred to veterans, one of the few groups in this country that a vast majority of people show respect for no matter their political or even religious/spiritual beliefs and it was done on company time, and then it gets posted online, likely within close computer space to the employer of the person who posted it, you get an employer that feels that this employee does things that could reflect negatively on their business.
What she did is a violation of the code of conduct for visitors to the Arlington Cementary. She could have been asked to leave immediately and if refused could have been arrested.
This isn't about her freedom of speech but rather her violation of the Arlington Cementary conduct rules. Simple as that.
You will never see the Westboro Baptist Church inside the Arlington Cementary. They can protest outside the main entrance but even they know they could be arrested if they pulled their circus act inside the compound.
Technology doesn't change cause and effect.My point is that stupidity hasn't become any worse an offense since the dawn of man, so the consequences shouldn't be any more swift or frequent simply because technology gives us more opportunities to witness it.
People have a right to survive, and in the economic model currently employed in the United States, for 9 out of 10 of us that means having a job. Since all of us are harmless idiots at one point or another, it seems to me that you should be allowed to be a harmless idiot every once in a while without suddenly having to worry about how you're going to pay your rent or put food on the table.
IIRC, the company was investigating, but she eventually resigned of her own choice. Supposedly.
I don't believe she intended to be disrespectful, but she was. Key word: "intend". I have done things that I didn't intend to offend others, but it was and I didn't realize it until later.
Has anyone spoke on this issue? I am curious if the picture also constitutes a violation vs how the rules are worded.
CHAPTER V: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SUBCHAPTER D: MILITARY RESERVATIONS AND NATIONAL CEMETERIES
PART 553: ARMY NATIONAL CEMETERIES
553.22 - Visitors' rules for the Arlington National Cemetery.
(13)
f) Conduct within the Cemetery. Because Arlington National Cemetery is a shrine to the honored dead of the Armed Forces of the United States and because certain acts, appropriate elsewhere, are not appropriate in the Cemetery, all visitors, including persons attending or taking part in memorial services and ceremonies, shall observe proper standards of decorum and decency while within the Cemetery grounds. Specifically, no person shall:
iv) Utters to any person present abusive, insulting, profane, indecent or otherwise provocative language or gesture that by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
what? When did private employers become responsible for facilitating free speech?
Technology doesn't change cause and effect.
And nobody is taking that away from her, except herself. She was with her company on a company trip, and not only made an ass of herself, but her employer as well. I don't know any employer who wouldn't fire someone who is that recklessly stupid and irresponsible.
Unless she was wearing something indicating where she works (she wasn't) or unless you're arguing that the employer in question is paying her for 24 hours of each day that she was on this trip (because they never, ever do), it doesn't change a thing.
If she'd taken that photo 20 years ago, where would she have put it? Her GeoCities account? My point is that technology has made our individual silliness more accessible to all. The appropriate response isn't to villify it wherever we find it, it's to try to be a little more understanding in light of the fact that all of this connectedness that social media promotes means we're going to see things we wouldn't have seen before.
As I said earlier:
Behaving like a childish idiot isn't a crime, and any employer who fires her is looking at a pretty nasty first-amendment based wrongful termination suit.
Do you think it is appropriate, given the current state of the economy, for one moment of off-the-job, entirely-legal stupidity to cost you your job?
Do you think it is appropriate, given the current state of the economy, for one moment of off-the-job, entirely-legal stupidity to cost you your job?
You didn't answer my question. You essentially said, "Because."