• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arctic Cold Smashes October Records in the West, Plains

So you agree it is warming. Thanks

Only the western region.

Do you agree that the eastern region is said to be gaining more mass more than the the western is losing?
 
So it is warming rapidly. Thanks

I didn't agree with your staement. I only said it's bvelow freezing still.

Besides, have you ever considered how more moisture in the air due to AGW actually favors the balance of deposition over sublimation?
 
I didn't agree with your staement. I only said it's bvelow freezing still.

Besides, have you ever considered how more moisture in the air due to AGW actually favors the balance of deposition over sublimation?

Dude it's too late. You gave the temperature difference yourself. Its warming rapidly. Thanks
 
Dude it's too late. You gave the temperature difference yourself. Its warming rapidly. Thanks

OMG. Do you really lack any comprehensive skills?

You claimed a 2.4 degree increase. I was humoring you by saying "IF" a below freezing temperure increased by "YOUR" 2.4 degree claim...

Buy a clue please.

That was your temperature difference I used.
 
OMG. Do you really lack any comprehensive skills?

You claimed a 2.4 degree increase. I was humoring you by saying "IF" a below freezing temperure increased by "YOUR" 2.4 degree claim...

Buy a clue please.

That was your temperature difference I used.

I accept your concession
 
Researchers reported December 21, 2012 in*Nature Geoscience*that from 1958 to 2010, the average temperature at the mile-high*Byrd Station*rose by 2.4 degrees Celsius, with warming fastest in its winter and spring. The spot which is in the heart of the*West Antarctic Ice Sheet*is one of the fastest-warming places on Earth.[12][13][14]

Researchers reported ... that from 1958 to 2010, the average
temperature at ... Byrd Station*rose by 2.4 degrees Celsius​

Here's the DATA from Byrd Station

If you dump that data into Excel and take the averages for each year
Jan through Dec and then have Excel compute the slope 1957 through
2018 it comes to 0.026 it's then a simple matter to multiply by the 61
years to come up with 1.6°C.

If you do it for 1958 - 2010 from the Nature Geoscience article it
comes to 2.2°C

Here it is graphed out:

image.png
 
I accept your concession

OMG...

Really?

LOL...

LOL...

LOL...

It was your number I used to make a pojnt, and you once again, fail to comprehend such simple things.

LOL...
 
Researchers reported ... that from 1958 to 2010, the average
temperature at ... Byrd Station*rose by 2.4 degrees Celsius​

Here's the DATA from Byrd Station

If you dump that data into Excel and take the averages for each year
Jan through Dec and then have Excel compute the slope 1957 through
2018 it comes to 0.026 it's then a simple matter to multiply by the 61
years to come up with 1.6°C.

If you do it for 1958 - 2010 from the Nature Geoscience article it
comes to 2.2°C

Here it is graphed out:

image.png

Thank-you.

My "IF" -20 degree starting point was about 17 degrees too high...
 
The USA Today writer of the said headline is correct, AOC said it since she included herself in that quote. The only thing that is clear is your horrible reading comprehension.

I am sorry that you are in deep denial. You want it to be true so bad because you're cemented in your right-wing worldview.
One more time, the subject is the millennials. You know what the word "subject" means? Did you take English class?
 
Thank-you.

My "IF" -20 degree starting point was about 17 degrees too high...

You're welcome (-:

A quick and dirty graph mostly because the data was neatly laid out.
It's great when data is displayed in a straight forward manner. For
some reason a lot of data is difficult to find and download and then
decipher. Our friends at NOAA and NASA try to hide theirs. Thank
goodness for the Internet WayBack Machine.

Regarding the Byrd Station record, it looks like yet another sinusoidal
climate pattern that ocillates over a period of decades. The 1958-2010
change of 2.2° is reasonably close to the 2.4° value cited by Vegas
Giant from the Nature Geoscience article.

Not all claims from our good friends on the left come that close to
reality. That's why I checked it out. mostly it's the predictions that
are exaggerated. As Yogi Berra said, “It's tough to make predictions,
especially about the future.” He might have added "Especially if you
exaggerate the crap out of everything."
 
You're welcome (-:

A quick and dirty graph mostly because the data was neatly laid out.
It's great when data is displayed in a straight forward manner. For
some reason a lot of data is difficult to find and download and then
decipher. Our friends at NOAA and NASA try to hide theirs. Thank
goodness for the Internet WayBack Machine.

Regarding the Byrd Station record, it looks like yet another sinusoidal
climate pattern that ocillates over a period of decades. The 1958-2010
change of 2.2° is reasonably close to the 2.4° value cited by Vegas
Giant from the Nature Geoscience article.

Not all claims from our good friends on the left come that close to
reality. That's why I checked it out. mostly it's the predictions that
are exaggerated. As Yogi Berra said, “It's tough to make predictions,
especially about the future.” He might have added "Especially if you
exaggerate the crap out of everything."

That's what gets me the most about these true believers.

They fail to acknowledge natural cycles exist. They are deniers of this reality in science.
 
That's what gets me the most about these true believers.

They fail to acknowledge natural cycles exist. They are deniers of this reality in science.

Natural cycles have been accounted for.....except in your religion
 
I see you have nothing

You aren't offering any proof either. Fact is, they don't know enough to make any proper quantitative assessments. Fact is, the earth has been warmer in past times this interglacier period. Fact is, we didn't have SUVs and {Power plants spewing out CO2 when it was warmer in past times.
 
You aren't offering any proof either. Fact is, they don't know enough to make any proper quantitative assessments. Fact is, the earth has been warmer in past times this interglacier period. Fact is, we didn't have SUVs and {Power plants spewing out CO2 when it was warmer in past times.

People died of lung cancer before cigarettes were invented.


But cigarettes still cause lung cancer.


There can be more than one cause
 
Back
Top Bottom