Also, don't forget the recent Texas church massacre (11/05/17) where Stephen Willeford STOPPED the mass shooter with his.........
wait for it gun grabbers.........
AR-15.
But wait, they probably never knew about this because, if you take a look at this CNN article,
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/us/texas-church-shooting/index.html , you would know the SHOOTER'S name, and that he used a Ruger AR-556 rifle, but you would NOT know the name of the citizen who CHASED DOWN the shooter, NOR the fact that this courageous upstanding citizen used an AR-15 "big black scary military style assault rifle" in a very positive way...
If you would have read this CNN article,
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/us/texas-church-shooting-what-we-know/index.html , you would at least know that Steven Willeford was the courageous citizen who stopped the shooter, but you would only know that the shooter used a "Ruger AR "assault-type rifle"", without knowing that Willeford used an AR-15 to stop the shooter.
This New York Times article,
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/05/us/church-shooting-texas.html , lets you know the shooter's name and that he used a "military-style rifle", and later mentions that it was a "Ruger military-style rifle", says that it was the "deadliest mass shooting in the state's history", but it doesn't mention much of anything about Steven Willeford beyond "an armed neighbor exchanged gunfire with him" ... oh wait, but later on in the article, we get back to information about the shooter again... "The authorities said Mr. Kelley used an Ruger AR-15 variant — a knockoff of the standard service rifle carried by the American military for roughly half a century." It goes on to talk about AR-15's and their "variants", but NOWHERE is it mentioned that Steven Willeford (the guy who returned fire back at the shooter) was armed with an AR-15... NOWHERE...
This NBC article,
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/t...alties-reported-texas-church-shooting-n817751 , names the shooter, talks about it being the most deadly mass shooting in state history, states that the shooter was armed with a "Ruger AR assault-type rifle" (notice the very similar language between the mainstream media articles??), but all it says about Steven Willeford was this... "An unidentified resident confronted the gunman after the shooting began, "grabbed his rifle and engaged that suspect," according to Martin." ... This article never mentioned his name, and never mentioned that he used an AR-15 to return fire back at the shooter.
This FOX News article,
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/05/mass-shooting-reported-at-texas-sutherland-springs-church.html , isn't much better... It names the shooter, says he used a "Ruger AR rifle", and says that the shooter was "confronted by an armed nearby resident who chased after him".
This Washington Post article,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-shot-at-texas-church/?utm_term=.4a0e517551e2 , names the gunman and says that he "started shooting with an assault rifle" and said that he was "spraying bullets", but only says than an "armed civilian" took off after the shooter, and leaves out his name (Steven Willeford) and that he used an AR-15.
It was not until I dug deep and SPECIFICALLY SEARCHED for an article that THE FEDERALIST posted,
http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/07/hero-stopped-texas-gunman-couldnt-stopped-without-ar-15/ , that I saw (and was linked to) anything of ANY depth about the upstanding citizen Steven Willeford and the fact that he used an AR-15 against the shooter.
So, in conclusion, I dare ANY gun grabbing leftist reading this post to tell me that the mainstream media isn't biased in their reporting and that the mainstream media doesn't have an anti-gun agenda...