• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Apprentice' contestant's Trump defamation lawsuit can proceed

Fruityfact said:
What's with republicans and picking sexual assaulters to the supreme court?
Click to expand...

The person appointing them apparently gets his sexual kicks peeping on naked female children.

Peeping Don: Trump spied on teens, contestants say
A former Miss Arizona said Donald Trump barged into a dressing room with naked contestants during the 2001 Miss USA pageant. Four former Miss Teen USA contestants told BuzzFeed that Trump did the same thing in 1997 – with girls as young as 15.

They are all birds of a feather. Interesting that Evangelical Christians consistently defend this behavior.
 
Fruityfact said:
What's with republicans and picking sexual assaulters to the supreme court?
Click to expand...

Please show me someone that was convicted of sexual assault sitting on the supreme court because i don't know of any.
 
ludin said:
Please show me someone that was convicted of sexual assault sitting on the supreme court because i don't know of any.
Click to expand...

Nobody was convicted. Doesn't mean they didn't do it.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! You wouldn't know in any case and that's utterly irrelevant to what I stated.
Click to expand...

This reminds me of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, but there was three woman going after him without one shred of corroborated evidence. And all you libs believed every word they said. Now this woman who's been hanging around trying to find a lawyer to take her case, shows up again. You libs should send her a donation to help her out.
 
Born Free said:
This reminds me of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, but there was three woman going after him without one shred of corroborated evidence. And all you libs believed every word they said. Now this woman who's been hanging around trying to find a lawyer to take her case, shows up again. You libs should send her a donation to help her out.
Click to expand...

Amazing how Marxists like you just can't post anything relevant.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Amazing how Marxists like you just can't post anything relevant.
Click to expand...

Coming from you that is what I expect, never address the issue. You pull out the liberal paybook "your a racist" now you call me a Marxists.
 
Born Free said:
Coming from you that is what I expect, never address the issue. You pull out the liberal paybook "your a racist" now you call me a Marxists.
Click to expand...

Yawn. I addressed the issue. You spouted something irrelevant to what I stated and tried to insult me by calling me a liberal.

Your hero Alinsky would be proud of you, comrade.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Yawn. I addressed the issue. You spouted something irrelevant to what I stated and tried to insult me by calling me a liberal.

Your hero Alinsky would be proud of you, comrade.
Click to expand...

Your not a liberal, I'll be damned, You not a Republican, so your all alone, no one will have you.
 
Fruityfact said:
Nobody was convicted. Doesn't mean they didn't do it.
Click to expand...

actually it does. innocent until proven guilty so thanks for admitting that no one was charged with sexual
assault and is sitting on the supreme court.

anything else other than that just means you are being dishonest and we can dismiss anything you say.
 
ludin said:
actually it does. innocent until proven guilty so thanks for admitting that no one was charged with sexual
assault and is sitting on the supreme court.
Click to expand...

We know from the dog and pony show last September that Democrats don't give a **** about "innocent until proven guilty".
 
Defamation. :roll:
"He called me a liar, so i'm suing!"

Clogging up the courts with crap.
 
ludin said:
actually it does. innocent until proven guilty so thanks for admitting that no one was charged with sexual
assault and is sitting on the supreme court.

anything else other than that just means you are being dishonest and we can dismiss anything you say.
Click to expand...

Actually it doesn't. The absence of a guilty charge does not mean the person did not do the crime.
 
Fruityfact said:
Actually it doesn't. The absence of a guilty charge does not mean the person did not do the crime.
Click to expand...

actually it does. innocent until proven guilty not guilty until your prove yourself innocent.
as i said anything else just means you are dishonest

so have a nice day and we now know you have no interest in being honest in discussions.

FBI investigations found nothing. so now the FBI is lying.
the witnesses that said nope he wasn't there are lying.

The fact that it was proven that at least 2 of the women lied and the 3rd has questionable
stories, and the fact that 2 other men said yea that was them.

pretty much means he was innocent and telling the truth.
so as i said before nothing you have to say is honest so not worth listening to
have a nice day.
 
ludin said:
actually it does. innocent until proven guilty not guilty until your prove yourself innocent.
as i said anything else just means you are dishonest
Click to expand...

Again, the absence of a guilty charge does not mean the person didn't do the crime. Do you know about the OJ case?
 
Fruityfact said:
Again, the absence of a guilty charge does not mean the person didn't do the crime. Do you know about the OJ case?
Click to expand...

he was found innocent. therefore he according to not only the courts but the jury he was innocent of the crime.
as i said all you have is dishonesty. so facts are facts there is no anyone that committed sexual assault that sits on the supreme court.

if you think you have evidence that supports that he committed a crime you should turn it over to the FBI.
witholding evidence is a federal felony.
 
ludin said:
he was found innocent. therefore he according to not only the courts but the jury he was innocent of the crime.
as i said all you have is dishonesty. so facts are facts there is no anyone that committed sexual assault that sits on the supreme court.

if you think you have evidence that supports that he committed a crime you should turn it over to the FBI.
witholding evidence is a federal felony.
Click to expand...

Its quite likely that two individuals who sit on the supreme court committed sexual assault, they simply were not charged and convicted of their crimes. Not too surprisingly you defend the *****grabber in chief.
 
Fruityfact said:
Its quite likely that two individuals who sit on the supreme court committed sexual assault, they simply were not charged and convicted of their crimes. Not too surprisingly you defend the *****grabber in chief.
Click to expand...

Trump is typical of the “man with power” who can do and say whatever he wants to women and get away with it. Hopefully the “me too” movement will continue to put a stop to this total denigration of women.
 
Fruityfact said:
Its quite likely that two individuals who sit on the supreme court committed sexual assault, they simply were not charged and convicted of their crimes. Not too surprisingly you defend the *****grabber in chief.
Click to expand...

dismissed for for dishonesty have a nice day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom