• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Apologies

Do any of you people ever read the NT?
I have.
Matthew 5:18
For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass away from the law until all things are accomplished

What law? The law of the prophets
 
I have.
Matthew 5:18
For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass away from the law until all things are accomplished

What law? The law of the prophets

What part of the 10 commandments has passed away?
 
There are ten of them, you may have heard of them.

We can go with the decalogue, the rules god told Moses to write down which includes ways of treating the Canaanites, or what you refer to.
 
We can go with the decalogue, the rules god told Moses to write down which includes ways of treating the Canaanites, or what you refer to.

Huh????
 
Rights cannot be forfeited, only outweighed.

It is good to have someone admit the fetus has rights. That is progress.

Yes, the fetus has rights, when it no longer poses an existential threat to a woman. For instance, if she dies fom an injury, every effort should be made to preserve the fetal life. Only then is it appropriate to consider that fetal life as deserving individual rights. While it persists in parasitism, all rights are the existing human rights of a woman to allow it or not , there is NO rational alternative. Any division of rights is really just a degree of female HUMAN oppression.
 
Yes, the fetus has rights, when it no longer poses an existential threat to a woman. For instance, if she dies fom an injury, every effort should be made to preserve the fetal life. Only then is it appropriate to consider that fetal life as deserving individual rights. While it persists in parasitism, all rights are the existing human rights of a woman to allow it or not , there is NO rational alternative. Any division of rights is really just a degree of female HUMAN oppression.
To the contrary, there are many rational alternatives.

One point--it is never a parasite. That would imply different species.
 
To the contrary, there are many rational alternatives.

One point--it is never a parasite. That would imply different species.

Of course a fetus is not a parasite.

A previable fetus however , is completely physically dependent on the life of women and her biological body’s functions.

If a pregnant women dies before her fetus is viable, it too will die even if quickly removed and given the very best medical and advanced care if avaible.

However if a pregnant woman dies when her fetus is viable , there is a good chance it will survive if quickly removed and given medical care.
 
Of course a fetus is not a parasite. A previable fetus however , is completely physically dependent on the life of women and her biological body’s functions. If a pregnant women dies before her fetus is viable, it too will die even if quickly removed and given the very best medical and advanced care if avaible. However if a pregnant woman dies when her fetus is viable , there is a good chance it will survive if quickly removed and given medical care.
Julius Ceasar is an example. His name is the reason non-vaginal birth is called a C-section.

However, You used the word parasitic, which is a pejorative and not very accurate.
 
Julius Ceasar is an example. His name is the reason non-vaginal birth is called a C-section.

However, You used the word parasitic, which is a pejorative and not very accurate.

I did not use the word parasite or parasitic to describe a fetus.

I used the word visible.

And what I posted is fact.
A non viable fetus will not survive without the pregnant woman’s working biological functions.
 
I did not use the word parasite or parasitic.

I used the word visible.

And what I posted is fact.
A non viable fetus will not survive without the woman’s working biological functions.

My bad. It was D_Natured. You responded to a post where I quoted him.
 
To the contrary, there are many rational alternatives.

One point--it is never a parasite. That would imply different species.

There you go, splitting hairs rather than addressing the point. You lose.
 
Back
Top Bottom