• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another First For Female Soldiers [W:266]

Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Henrin said:
The logic is weird.

The government can't teach young men abstinence in public school. You know, they can't teach young men to be disciplined and not have sex.
Click to expand...

Abstinence is bad because it treats sex like it's something shameful. It does nothing to inform young people about reality regarding intercourse, and the safe precautions you can take to avoid risks.


The government can teach young men to not have sex with women while in the military.

Am I the only one that finds the logic weird?
Click to expand...

Yes, you are the only one. Because any one else would be able to tell you that the military is not the same as the civilian world.

You do realize that you can have sex while in the military, right? There are people in my unit banging right now, because they're in relationships.

The age difference can easily be zero between the two if they don't start school until they are six.
Click to expand...

And?
 
Last edited:
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Jredbaron96 said:
Abstinence is bad because it treats sex like it's something shameful. It does nothing to inform young people about reality regarding intercourse, and the safe precautions you can take to avoid risks.
Click to expand...

Your point was that they shouldn't be having sex, which is exactly what abstinence teaches. The argument you put out against abstinence teaching is much stronger than what is commonly used however. It's not that the message doesn't work, but that people teach it in a dumb way.


Yes, you are the only one. Because any one else would be able to tell you that the military is not the same as the civilian world.
Click to expand...

We are talking about human capability here, you know. People argue that abstinence can't work because young men and women will have sex anyway. What they are basically saying is that discipline when it comes to sex can't be taught because they will do what they do.

And?
Click to expand...

If the age difference is nonexistent then the same basic truth between the two should be the same in most cases.
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Henrin said:
Your point was that they shouldn't be having sex, which is exactly what abstinence teaches. The argument you put out against abstinence teaching is much stronger then what is commonly used however. It's not that the message doesn't work, but that people teach it in a dumb way.
Click to expand...

No, that's not my point at all. My point was Drill Instructors/Sergeants should not be having sex with new recruits. Basic training is for being taught how to be a soldier, not how to be bent over a desk.




We are talking about human capability here, you know. People argue that abstinence can't work because young men and women will have sex anyway. What they are basically saying is that discipline when it comes to sex can't be taught because they will do what they do.
Click to expand...

Which is not applicable to a military environment, which is what we're talking about. Civilians can do whatever the **** they want.



If the age difference is nonexistent then the same basic truth between the two should be the same in most cases.
Click to expand...

I have no idea where you're going with this.
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Jredbaron96 said:
And it's their own damn fault. Part of being in the military is having discipline. If you can't keep it in your pants you don't deserve to be in it.
Click to expand...

Bull****

Liberal Pajama Boys do not join the military

These are red-blooded American males
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Henrin said:
Don't teach abstinence because you can't expect people to not ****.

Military men have to be disciplined and keep it in their pants.

Ah...

Did I miss something? You can't expect a seventeen year old boy not to ****, but once that boy turns eighteen and enters the military you can? What? :lamo
Click to expand...

You can definitely expect somebody whose, you know, a legal adult to have some discipline, self control, and, you know, half a brain.
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
Bull****

Liberal Pajama Boys do not join the military

These are red-blooded American males
Click to expand...

Really? I'm currently serving. I'm a liberal.

You wanna keep saying stupid ****?
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Jredbaron96 said:
Really? I'm currently serving. I'm a liberal.

You wanna keep saying stupid ****?
Click to expand...

Its the internet where liberals can make themselves anything they want to be
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
Its the internet where liberals can make themselves anything they want to be
Click to expand...

Seventy to eighty percent of the military would likely be conservative, not a hundred percent. It is however weird that the military is run like a progressive organization these days. lol

Progressives aren't even that interested in enlisting, so lets appeal to them while alienating the group most likely to enlist.

Brilliant.
 
Last edited:
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Henrin said:
Seventy to eighty percent of the military would likely be conservative, not a hundred percent. It is however weird that the military is run like a progressive organization these days. lol

Progressives aren't even that interested in enlisting, so lets appeal to them while alienating the group most likely to enlist.

Brilliant.
Click to expand...

The military is a progressive social club because obama put bedwetters in high places over his 8 years in office
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
The military is a progressive social club because obama put bedwetters in high places over his 8 years in office
Click to expand...

It goes back from before Obama, but I would put most of the blame on democrat presidents.
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Henrin said:
It goes back from before Obama, but I would put most of the blame on democrat presidents.
Click to expand...

I would include bush in the blame game
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
I would include bush in the blame game
Click to expand...

But with one caveat

Bush was merely an idiot

He cared about the soldiers but was very incompetent

Obama and clinton didn't give a damn about the men and women serving in the military
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Henrin said:
Seventy to eighty percent of the military would likely be conservative, not a hundred percent.
Click to expand...

Not really. Most junior enlisted are independent or moderates, and the officer corps is split roughly 50/50. Typically the general staff tend to be more Republican, while junior officers tend to be more liberal.
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
Bull****

Liberal Pajama Boys do not join the military

These are red-blooded American males
Click to expand...

What would you know about being a red-blooded American male?
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

CMPancake said:
What would you know about being a red-blooded American male?
Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah

The internet is full of phony internet hero's like you since no one can prove otherwise
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Tigerace117 said:
Buddy, didn't you learn anything from the last time you tried to pull that shtick?
Click to expand...

Nothing has changed

Liberal internet liars are as thick as fleas around here because their claims cannot be debunked
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
Nothing has changed

Liberal internet liars are as thick as fleas around here because their claims cannot be debunked
Click to expand...

Uh......a lot has changed.

You claimed he was lying and wasn't actually in the military. He posted proof(a picture) which pretty explicitly shows that he is, in fact, in the military and that your claim was false. You immediately went on to accuse another individual of lying.
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Tigerace117 said:
Uh......a lot has changed.

You claimed he was lying and wasn't actually in the military. He posted proof(a picture) which pretty explicitly shows that he is, in fact, in the military and that your claim was false. You immediately went on to accuse another individual of lying.
Click to expand...

There is no proof he is or was in the military
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Mac77 said:
There is no proof he is or was in the military
Click to expand...

Yes there was. Would you like to see it again? I don't know how you could have possibly missed it the first time.....
 
Re: Another First For Female Soldiers

Tigerace117 said:
Yes there was. Would you like to see it again? I don't know how you could have possibly missed it the first time.....
Click to expand...

The picture proves nothing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom