• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American Bar Association: Delay Kavanaugh until FBI investigates assault allegations

In American political discourse today "non-partisan" essentially means "says what the people we want to support us want to hear".

Not only does it NOT say that they WOULD have changed their rating had they met, it does NOT say that they WOULD NOT have changed their rating had they met.

Additionally, the reproduced letter also DOES NOT say anything along the lines of "Having heard the allegations, the committee is going to meet shortly to consider whether it should either change its rating or issue any caveat along the lines of "Should the current investigation produce evidence indicative of confirmation of the allegations, the committee will reconsider its rating and - until that happens - the current rating should be considered to be in abeyance.".

PS - Your "Return to Power By Any Means Necessary" is the same slogan that the Republicans adopt when they are "out of power", whilst "in power" their slogan is "Cling To Power By Any Means Necessary" (which, not surprisingly, is the same slogan as adopted by the Democrats when THEY are "in power").

Here is the problem most fair minded Americans, certainly not the radical left, are thinking

Information from Marilyn Doyle-Delahunty, member of American Nation of Common Sense since August 4, 2017.

She wanted (Dr. Ford) to remain anonymous, so why is she speaking out now? Or why did the Democrats release the information to the Press?

Here’s the time-line:

In 1982, something happened. In 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989,1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 She said nothing.

In July 25, 2003, President George W. Bush nominated Kavanagh to the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, Dr. Ford said nothing. In 2004 and 2005 she said nothing.

On May 11, 2006, The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recommended confirmation of Judge Kavanagh, and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Dr. Ford said nothing.

On June 1, 2006, Kavanagh is sworn in by Justice Anthony Kennedy, and Dr.Ford said nothing.

In 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, she said nothing.

In 2012, she “remembered” something happened in 1982, yet she said nothing.

In 2013, 2014, and 2015 she said nothing.

In 2016, 2017 and 2018, Dr. Ford professes to be a Liberal activist and an anti-Trump protester.

In 2018, with Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation looming in the horizon, she decides she “should say something” about Kavanaugh’s sexual behavior. Keep in mind that this person has a degree in Clinical Psychology, yet she can’t remember the place or time of the alleged incident.

What’s wrong with this picture??
 
Here is the problem most fair minded Americans, certainly not the radical left, are thinking

Information from Marilyn Doyle-Delahunty, member of American Nation of Common Sense since August 4, 2017.



What’s wrong with this picture??

As a federal judge he was not in her jurisdiction.
As a SC Justice his votes would affect all of the US citizens.

Ms ford wanted to remain anonymous.

She wrote the letter when judge Kavenaugh was on President Trumps short list hoping that her letter would prevent him from being nominate. He was picked anyway.

By late August she decided not to come forward and put her family at risk.

But reporters stated to investigate the info in the Post and one cameto her home, and to the classroom where she taught . She found out another reporter was qustioning her colleagues so she decided to come forward before a reporter outed her.
 
As a federal judge he was not in her jurisdiction.
As a SC Justice his votes would affect all of nations people.

Ms ford wanted to remain anonymous.

She wrote the letter when judge Kavenaugh was on President Trumps short list hoping that her letter would prevent him from being nominate. He was picked anyway.

By late August she decided not to come forward and put her family at risk.

But reporters stated to investigate the info in the Post and one cameto her home, and to the classroom where she taught . She found out another reporter was qustioning her colleagues so she decided to come forward before a reporter outed her.

She took a lie detector test and hired a Left wing activist attorney. At this point, no one believes she wanted to remain anonymous.
 
I don't think you are even qualified to respond to me anymore.
Right, because someone with low intellect post like you are the one to determine that.

I really don't care about your delusional beliefs
I really don't give a crap about what you believe. I pointed out the utter stupidity in your post and your endless labeling and deflections do not change that reality.
 
As a federal judge he was not in her jurisdiction.
As a SC Justice his votes would affect all of the US citizens.

Ms ford wanted to remain anonymous.

She wrote the letter when judge Kavenaugh was on President Trumps short list hoping that her letter would prevent him from being nominate. He was picked anyway.

By late August she decided not to come forward and put her family at risk.

But reporters stated to investigate the info in the Post and one cameto her home, and to the classroom where she taught . She found out another reporter was qustioning her colleagues so she decided to come forward before a reporter outed her.

Wanted to remain anonymous? That point is moot but the point remains, sometime in the last 36 years she had the opportunity to come forward and didn't. She lives in the state of California so what the hell is she afraid of? So her family is at risk but not Kavanaugh's? This is nothing more than a leftwing hit job and witch hunt, search and destroy and if you believe t his woman then you are part of the problem never part of the solution

The left's tabloid politics is on full display. There was no complaint thus nothing to investigate and if you believe a 15 year old was so traumatized by this event for over 36 years, then you are very naïve, gullible and part of the leftwing radical ideology. Fairminded people get it, and that leaves out everyone on the left
 
As a federal judge he was not in her jurisdiction.
As a SC Justice his votes would affect all of the US citizens.

Ms ford wanted to remain anonymous.

She wrote the letter when judge Kavenaugh was on President Trumps short list hoping that her letter would prevent him from being nominate. He was picked anyway.

By late August she decided not to come forward and put her family at risk.

But reporters stated to investigate the info in the Post and one cameto her home, and to the classroom where she taught . She found out another reporter was qustioning her colleagues so she decided to come forward before a reporter outed her.

Just a reminder, because you want something to be true doesn't make it true. Evidence and facts always win court cases and debates, none available on this issue from the so called victim

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mi...ng-criminal-charges-against-kavanaugh-in-memo
 
Back
Top Bottom