• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Adam Schiff's EPIC SMACKDOWN of repubs & Trump who have attacked him.

Under investigation for what?

NUMEROUS ethics violations... AND I am not sure what to make of this tape of Schiff possibly colluding as yet... any answers for that?
 
Last edited:
NUMEROUS ethics violations... AND I am not sure what to make of this tape of Schiff possibly colluding as yet... any answers for that?

Specifically, what ethics violations?
 
You mean his fit of righteous indignation video?
However you want to state it, the thing you asked for is there in the video.

Yeah I saw that.
What he said was in the public domain.
That means it was available to Mueller too.
That means you can pick it up from that point ...
- That would mean Mueller must've missed it.
- The chances of that are slim, right?
- That would make Mueller, his team, and the FBI terribly incompetent.
- Or that would make Schiff truly full of ****.
- But let's say Schiff actually has something Mueller doesn't.
- That would mean Schiff should have turned it over to Mueller but he didn't.
- That would make Schiff guilty of obstruction of justice, wouldn't it?
No offense, but this does not make sense. Several things Schiff mentioned were brought to the public domain by Mueller. So...
 
Such bull****. The majority of the email back and forth is nailing down the time of the meeting. Again, what's your point?



Yet more bull****. Is that all you post?

Your post is a lie and an incoherent rant. As usual. It must be a day that ends in "y" in Trump Fan Nation.

The email exchange Trump Jr. released, in chronological order

Some of the more juicy snippets:

Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.

The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.

This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin.


To which Junior replied:

if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer

Tell me more about that bull**** again.
 
Last edited:
Your post is a lie and an incoherent rant. As usual. It must be a day that ends in "y" in Trump Fan Nation.

The email exchange Trump Jr. released, in chronological order

Some of the more juicy snippets:

Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.

The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.

This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin.


To which Junior replied:

if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer

Tell me more about that bull**** again.

Sorry, but I'm not seeing the basis for your over arching significance you seem to be attaching to this.

"The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father."

This was the bait for the meeting. And that part of it worked.

No such information exchange hands, as no such information was used during the campaign. If it had exchanged hands, it surely would have been used, don't you think?

Since the meeting was held, and no information appears to have been exchanged, this actually strengths the argument that the meeting was a frame up job.

The next question is who would have the greatest benefit from the frame up job?

Well, that'd be the Clinton campaign, closely followed by the Obama's FBI and IC cabals and especially the ivenstigation run by Peter Strzok, et. al., as well as those who submitted and undersigned the fraudulent FISA warrant, so that'd be Comey, McCabe, and a couple of others (can't recall specifically 100% right now).

I think you misreading / misinterpreting the larger context of what was going on at the time.
 
Sorry, but I'm not seeing the basis for your over arching significance you seem to be attaching to this.

"The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father."

This was the bait for the meeting. And that part of it worked.

No such information exchange hands, as no such information was used during the campaign. If it had exchanged hands, it surely would have been used, don't you think?

Since the meeting was held, and no information appears to have been exchanged, this actually strengths the argument that the meeting was a frame up job.

The next question is who would have the greatest benefit from the frame up job?

Well, that'd be the Clinton campaign, closely followed by the Obama's FBI and IC cabals and especially the ivenstigation run by Peter Strzok, et. al., as well as those who submitted and undersigned the fraudulent FISA warrant, so that'd be Comey, McCabe, and a couple of others (can't recall specifically 100% right now).

I think you misreading / misinterpreting the larger context of what was going on at the time.

The "bait" for the meeting. Love it! So which one of them forced him to accept their offer of collusion?

I'm not talking about the fact that the idiot Junior was punked. I'm talking about him accepting an offer from what he believed to be the Russian government sharing sensitive information about a previous Secretary of State in order for Russia to help his father win the election. Why go to the FBI like a normal American would when you can collude with Russia?
 
The "bait" for the meeting. Love it! So which one of them forced him to accept their offer of collusion?

I'm not talking about the fact that the idiot Junior was punked. I'm talking about him accepting an offer from what he believed to be the Russian government sharing sensitive information about a previous Secretary of State in order for Russia to help his father win the election. Why go to the FBI like a normal American would when you can collude with Russia?

You get oppo research from where it may come from.

Some go out and buy rumor filled dossiers and believe it, others have it offered to them, but then don't get anything. :shrug:

You seem to have a fixation on Russians, like Schiff for brains.

55963153_2459029830822027_6338396642470789120_n.jpg
 
You get oppo research from where it may come from.

Some go out and buy rumor filled dossiers and believe it, others have it offered to them, but then don't get anything. :shrug:

You seem to have a fixation on Russians, like Schiff for brains.

55963153_2459029830822027_6338396642470789120_n.jpg


Cute meme. Yeah, the people with brains see Russians in the emails that the NY Times leaked and I posted for you to read yourself. For some reason, you didn't. I wonder why that is.

I never mentioned the Dossier. I posted a link to Junior's emails. You trying to go to the Dossier because you can't stand seeing what a crooked lousy family you worship?
 
Cute meme. Yeah, the people with brains see Russians in the emails that the NY Times leaked and I posted for you to read yourself. For some reason, you didn't. I wonder why that is.

I see Russians, but they don't cause me to lose my mind, my ability to think, my critical thinking abilities, and I see the interaction for what it is, an attempt at getting oppo research / info, which wasn't successful, and nothing more than that.

I never mentioned the Dossier. I posted a link to Junior's emails. You trying to go to the Dossier because you can't stand seeing what a crooked lousy family you worship?

I don't worship anyone. So just more diversion bull**** from you (becoming an often recurring pattern that).

In your mind bending panic over 'Russia! Russia! Russia!' you are completely missing the bigger picture of how we arrived at where we are, and how you are being manipulated, but then, there are always 'useful idiots' politicians, this time Democrats and leftist, manipulate, so nothing new there.
 
I see Russians, but they don't cause me to lose my mind, my ability to think, my critical thinking abilities, and I see the interaction for what it is, an attempt at getting oppo research / info, which wasn't successful, and nothing more than that.



I don't worship anyone. So just more diversion bull**** from you (becoming an often recurring pattern that).

In your mind bending panic over 'Russia! Russia! Russia!' you are completely missing the bigger picture of how we arrived at where we are, and how you are being manipulated, but then, there are always 'useful idiots' politicians, this time Democrats and leftist, manipulate, so nothing new there.

Of course you won't lose your mind. This is the wonderful Donald's son. Why would you care that he wants to collude with the Russians? The Donald, he's awesome - and his son is too.

I'm not being manipulated. I can read, and I read his emails. And like the smart people who abhor anti-American crap, I am disgusted by Junior's anti-American behavior. I know you aren't. He's terrific!
 
Schiff couldn't find his backside with both hands. He got famously played by two Russian phone pranksters saying they had compromising photos of Trump. He was all over that like a pig in mud. Apparently, Russian collusion was OK in that case. He's been saying for at least a year or more that he has evidence of collusion yet has never produced it. Why? Because he has nothing and is lying. Lots of the Dems claim to have some hitherto undiscovered evidence that they do not have. Swalwell is another liar. They have nothing. Their feverish desire to have collusion be true has made them think that it is. It's pitiful to watch.
 
I see Russians, but they don't cause me to lose my mind, my ability to think, my critical thinking abilities, and I see the interaction for what it is, an attempt at getting oppo research / info, which wasn't successful, and nothing more than that.



I don't worship anyone. So just more diversion bull**** from you (becoming an often recurring pattern that).

In your mind bending panic over 'Russia! Russia! Russia!' you are completely missing the bigger picture of how we arrived at where we are, and how you are being manipulated, but then, there are always 'useful idiots' politicians, this time Democrats and leftist, manipulate, so nothing new there.

Trump saw Russians too.

He saw Russians as a cash cow for Trump Tower Moscow.

He saw Russians when he sold real estate, like golf courses that lose money and condos that won't sell for that price on the open market but somehow get gobbled up by those willing to pay cash.

He saw Russians when he needed dirt on Hillary.

He saw Russians when he needed trolls to swarm social media.

He saw Russians when he needed loans to bail his ass out of imminent bankruptcy.

He saw Russians at Trump Tower NYC.

He saw Russians in the White House.
 
And yet Russia followed through and did just as he asked in less than 48 hrs.
This is a lie by you.
At no point did the President ask them to hack anything.
He asked them to release the emails to the press if they had them.
Nor could it be a request to hack for those emails as the server they were on was no longer online.
 
Why Russia? Why didn't he ask Canada, Albania or Iceland if they were listening????
As others already accurately addressed your comment, I'll just leave you with this... :lamo
 
This is a lie by you.
At no point did the President ask them to hack anything.
He asked them to release the emails to the press if they had them.
Nor could it be a request to hack for those emails as the server they were on was no longer online.

No he didn't. He asked them to find them.

Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.

He instructed them to go find them. And interestingly enough......
 
What's the point of your question?

Prediction: you will not answer that.

More like I shouldn't have to answer it because it's obvious. If Nunes was in on anything unethical in this matter then he'd have been indicted
 
So you're going with "That would make Mueller, his team, and the FBI terribly incompetent." because they're not sharp enough to assess the evidence as well as Schiff.

The Supreme Court splits and interprets the law differently... often. You really should refrain from jumping to conclusions.
 
No he didn't. He asked them to find them.

Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.

He instructed them to go find them. And interestingly enough......
Oy vey!

You can not go about finding something on a server that is no longer online. Duh!
It was a request to release to the press if they had them.
 
However you want to state it, the thing you asked for is there in the video.
I know. I've heard it all before from him and from the news since it's all been out there.
Here's the point about that all spelled out.

Say you were interviewing Schiff one on one and he again said he's seen non-circumstantial evidence of Trump/Russia collusion.
I hope you would ask what specific evidence he's talking about. Would you?
If he repeated the usual stuff I hope you would ask him why Mueller didn't recommend a "collusion" charge since he saw the very same thing, and probably more. Would you?
How would he respond?

That he's smarter than Mueller? Bad move 1.
The alternative would be that he knows something Mueller doesn't. Bad move 2 for the reasons mentioned that you haven't addressed yet.

No offense, but this does not make sense. Several things Schiff mentioned were brought to the public domain by Mueller. So...
I'm not offended. You just didn't think it through. See part 1 of this reply.
 
The Supreme Court splits and interprets the law differently... often. You really should refrain from jumping to conclusions.

Yeah they do. Often. Usually along ideological lines.
Is that how you see the Mueller and Schiff split being proposed here?
 
More like I shouldn't have to answer it because it's obvious. If Nunes was in on anything unethical in this matter then he'd have been indicted

Where was that logic during all of the investigations into Hillary Clinton? Nowhere to be found in the right wing, that's for sure.
 
More like I shouldn't have to answer it because it's obvious. If Nunes was in on anything unethical in this matter then he'd have been indicted

Read what you wrote.

Indicted for unethical behavior?

You're clearly floundering
 
Oy vey!

You can not go about finding something on a server that is no longer online. Duh!
It was a request to release to the press if they had them.

Are you intimating that Trump knew what the Russians had hacked and could not find access to?

Interesting
 
So you do not have the time line of the events at hand.
Interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom