- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 8,647
- Reaction score
- 3,150
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
100% agree...and now you can stand with me and fend off the arrows shot your way from the bleeding hearts who think that stupidity and irresponsibility being subsidized by taxpayers should continue as planned.
Irresponsibility should not be funded, either on an individual level or on a corporate level. This mentality has led to the decay of this country, imo.
Everyone's always focusing on the kid's parents and not the kids when they talk about these things.
I don't care what hte parents have done - I don't feel it's moral to allow kids to suffer without food and clothing for their parent's poor decisions... the only thing I Might agree on is the housing thing but that's actually not extremely common. Most of the time the gov provides financial assistance for housing and other basics.
THE CHILDREN! THE CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's the sum of your entire argument.
Exactly the opposite is happening. The reason these programs keep getting expanded is precisely because there is so much emphasis on the kids, and virtually none regarding the parents.
Exactly. As I have said, provide welfare for the children who have already had the misfortune for being genetically selected to be born to lousy parent, but for the love of pizza, put stipulations on the funding such as sterilization.