• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A good day to celebrate the lunacy of the USGOCT

Okay, I will, mike.

Here's some more of that evidence that you knee jerkingly agreed with quag I never provide.

The Official ReThink911 Video



Nice try, but it really has no bearing on what I posted regarding your posts.

There are many 9/11 vids. Care to prove that the vid you posted is accurate. Provide the sources to back it up.
 
Nice try, but it really has no bearing on what I posted regarding your posts.

There are many 9/11 vids. Care to prove that the vid you posted is accurate. Provide the sources to back it up.

You illustrate your dishonesty again, mike, by replying after you have stated so many times that you won't. All you guys are is silly memes, stroking one another's inane responses, zero evidence for the crazy USGOCT, denying reality and denying science.

You sit quiet while bh and others make the same kind of inane responses to volumes of evidence. Thoreau, Stundie, gerrycan, ... wouldn't think of providing support for that kind of nonsense, but you guys regularly do so.

Show some honesty for once, mike, watch the video. It is loaded with all manner of expert, architects, engineers, ... people who know science. This is something you science denying anti-truthers never provide, sources, or any experts.

beefheart just provided Michael Shermer, a complete fraud - whooooops, beefheart's bad.

From 2013, just think what the numbers are today.

One in Two Surveyed Have Doubts About Government’s Account of 9/11.

46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 after Viewing Video Footage of Collapse.

On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11, and after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed into its own footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11.

The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a global public awareness campaign launched on September 1. The campaign includes a 54-foot billboard in Times Square and a variety of transit and outdoor advertising in 11 other cities, all posing the question, “Did you know a third tower fell on 9/11?”

Among the poll’s findings:

38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, 10% do not believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about it;
46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those who are aware of Building 7’s collapse, only 19% know the building’s name;
After seeing video footage of Building 7′s collapse:
46% are sure or suspect it was caused by controlled demolition, compared to 28% who are sure or suspect fires caused it, and 27% who don’t know;
By a margin of nearly two to one, 41% support a new investigation of Building 7′s collapse, compared to 21% who oppose it.


New Poll Finds Most Americans Open to Alternative 9/11 Theories ? ReThink911.org | Sign the Petition for a new 9/11 investigation
 
There are many 9/11 vids. Care to prove that the vid you posted is accurate. Provide the sources to back it up.

Another dandy example of your [all of you] dishonesty. You guys will never address anything because all you have is a superficial knowledge gleaned from goofy debunker websites of the Michael Shermer type, the Popular Mechanics type.

You watch the video and you prove those architects and engineers are not telling the truth.

Of course I am joking. The idea that you guys would do such a thing is ludicrous in the extreme.
 
You illustrate your dishonesty again, mike, by replying after you have stated so many times that you won't. All you guys are is silly memes, stroking one another's inane responses, zero evidence for the crazy USGOCT, denying reality and denying science.

You sit quiet while bh and others make the same kind of inane responses to volumes of evidence. Thoreau, Stundie, gerrycan, ... wouldn't think of providing support for that kind of nonsense, but you guys regularly do so.

Show some honesty for once, mike, watch the video. It is loaded with all manner of expert, architects, engineers, ... people who know science. This is something you science denying anti-truthers never provide, sources, or any experts.

beefheart just provided Michael Shermer, a complete fraud - whooooops, beefheart's bad.

From 2013, just think what the numbers are today.

One in Two Surveyed Have Doubts About Government’s Account of 9/11.

46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 after Viewing Video Footage of Collapse.

Don't need to watch the vid. By not answering my question provided all I needed to know about the vid.
 
Another dandy example of your [all of you] dishonesty. You guys will never address anything because all you have is a superficial knowledge gleaned from goofy debunker websites of the Michael Shermer type, the Popular Mechanics type.

You watch the video and you prove those architects and engineers are not telling the truth.

Of course I am joking. The idea that you guys would do such a thing is ludicrous in the extreme.

The vid is yours to show that it is factual. Your claim , your burden.

It is so typical of you to try and shift the burden of proof.
 
Last edited:
But in Wayne's World, no such burden of proof exists for those who assert the official theory.....ain't it great!! :mrgreen:
 
But in Wayne's World, no such burden of proof exists for those who assert the official theory.....ain't it great!! :mrgreen:

Burden has been met but you ignore reality
 
Burden has been met but you ignore reality

Now you attempting humor, quag. Not one speck of proof/evidence for the USGOCT ever. There was even a special thread made for your guys to do so and mike got so frightened he started a distraction thread.
 
Now you attempting humor, quag. Not one speck of proof/evidence for the USGOCT ever. There was even a special thread made for your guys to do so and mike got so frightened he started a distraction thread.

Funny. I needed a good laugh this am.
You must be a comedian. Your posts are a joke. :lamo

Try going to the thread started by gerrycan regarding WTC7 and Dr. Hulsey. Answer the questions asked by me on that post. Keep in mind that thread is about WTC7 and Dr. Hulsey work.
 
The vid is yours to show that it is factual. Your claim , your burden.

It is so typical of you to try and shift the burden of proof.

You said, mike, "Don't need to watch the vid."

You guys do this all the time, illustrate that you have no interest in actually discussing the issues or the science.

USGOCT supporters are not the brightest bulbs. They get themselves into these quandaries and then make it worse for themselves trying to dig themselves out. This is why they won't discuss the USGOCT because they all know it is one huge wholly transparent lie.
 
Funny. I needed a good laugh this am.
You must be a comedian. Your posts are a joke. :lamo

One of the childish memes of USOCT supporters, just repeat what a truth telling person has said.


Try going to the thread started by gerrycan regarding WTC7 and Dr. Hulsey. Answer the questions asked by me on that post. Keep in mind that thread is about WTC7 and Dr. Hulsey work.

Try providing some evidence for the USG conspiracy theory, conspiracy theorist mike.
 
Try providing some evidence for the USG conspiracy theory, conspiracy theorist mike.

There is no evidence, no facts to support the OCT. That is demonstrated daily, and more and more ordinary people are beginning to realize it.
 
You said, mike, "Don't need to watch the vid."

You guys do this all the time, illustrate that you have no interest in actually discussing the issues or the science.

USGOCT supporters are not the brightest bulbs. They get themselves into these quandaries and then make it worse for themselves trying to dig themselves out. This is why they won't discuss the USGOCT because they all know it is one huge wholly transparent lie.

Every occur to you that I have watched it before. I don't need to watch it again.
 
There is no evidence, no facts to support the OCT. That is demonstrated daily, and more and more ordinary people are beginning to realize it.

If by OCT you mean the nonsense you peddle then yeah it is proven every single day
You have nothing but lies and willful ignorance to support your BS
Still waiting for you to explain your ground effect comments.
 
Every occur to you that I have watched it before. I don't need to watch it again.

That never does occur to them. Doing research involves watching guff on YooToob.
 
That never does occur to them. Doing research involves watching guff on YooToob.

Nah sometimes they go to CT sites to read articles that tell them exactly what they want to hear. The fact the articles are opinion pieces devoid of facts or logic is irrelevant
 
Nah sometimes they go to CT sites to read articles that tell them exactly what they want to hear. The fact the articles are opinion pieces devoid of facts or logic is irrelevant

I go to those sites and watch the guff on YooToob and I also go to places with the real evidence.
 
I go to those sites and watch the guff on YooToob and I also go to places with the real evidence.

I wont give them the hits, that's all they care about is getting more traffic.
 
If by OCT you mean the nonsense you peddle then yeah it is proven every single day


You know exactly what OCT means, Quag. Such dishonesty from you guys, always. mike tried this same phony meme a while back. And you guys have absolutely no shame for your patent, totally open dishonesty.
 
I go to those sites and watch the guff on YooToob and I also go to places with the real evidence.

But you will never bring forward any of your "real evidence", zyzygy, garnered from those "places" that you won't even mention, run by frauds whose names you also will never mention.
 
I wont give them the hits, that's all they care about is getting more traffic.

More patent dishonesty from you, Quag. A person who was actually interested in science, in the truth will go wherever it is needed to expose the truth.

Your actions sound like the typically childish actions we have come to expect from science denying anti-truthers.
 
Back
Top Bottom