- Joined
- Oct 25, 2016
- Messages
- 33,569
- Reaction score
- 20,250
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
How many? Give me a number
Impossible - no one knows that number.
How many? Give me a number
Impossible - no one knows that number.
So zero for all you know. Thanks
No, I've seen more than one, so more than zero. The capability is there. AR lowers are quite easy to make.
How many are made by a 3 d printer? Lol
The concepts of 3D printed guns, or digitally controlled milling machines, or 80% receivers, or any other of the multiple methods which allow the hoi-polloi to create their own guns anonymously, will continue to be of low significance.
In truth they dont seem all that popular anywhere in the world despite bans
Except here in the US.
Nope not here
If you don't think 80% receivers are popular, I must conclude you haven't been to a gun show.
I suppose we can cross that bridge when we get there. I'm sure you would agree they are not a factor now.
Is gun powder and ammo 3D printed?
Currently. Remember though, paper printers once cost thousands of dollars to.
Again can they make gun powder and primers. To make that requires specialized training. Hell we control the raw materials to make meth NOW. I am not worried in the slightest. If this is a problem it is 50 years away at best.
We have children that need saving today. Gun control works
The concepts of 3D printed guns, or digitally controlled milling machines, or 80% receivers, or any other of the multiple methods which allow the hoi-polloi to create their own guns anonymously, will continue to be of low significance. Such techniques only become important when guns are banned outright. Since that will never happen, it will be a nice niche hobby for a few people who have a few extra bucks to spend.
In a few localities where specific firearms have been "banned", there is some growing interest in these methods. Since those bans are very likely to eventually be overturned by the courts, this marketplace is not apt to grow much.
Anti-gunners will always be inventing yet another scheme to magically make some firearms difficult/impossible to own or operate. Here in the US, these schemes are just not able to get widespread traction; they only are popular amongst a very small number of organizations, and those organizations have extremely limited political power.
As long as we, the law-abiding adult gun owners of the United States, remain vigilant against erosion of our gun rights, outright gun bans will remain a dream of a very small fringe.
Gun POWDER is a chemical mixture usually composed of sulfur, charcoal and potassium nitrate, although there are other exotic formulations.
You don't "print" it, you mix it up. It's a recipe.
The ammo question doesn't really make sense.
If you can make your own gun, obviously it is possible to manufacture your own custom ammo, and a great many gun enthusiasts do exactly that.
Long before 3D printing existed, I watched a documentary about the FARC rebels in South America, circa 1990.
A KID, maybe twelve years old, made a very accurate and very capable rifle out of scrap metal parts using simple crude machine tools, in the middle of the jungle, by hand, completely from scratch. It gave excellent results.
Gunsmithing is a fine art and a science both.
None. Why would you ask?
To restate the conversation chain:
Of course I should have realized you would not be familiar with 80% receivers, and their popularity. I also should have realized that you know little about gun shows. FYI Every gun show I have been to in the past 5 years has had at least one booth selling 80% receivers, to say nothing of the thriving online business (last time I looked, the higher quality vendors were backlogged, quoting 6-8 week lead times for selected parts and jigs).
It was not my intention to embarass you by exposing your lack of expertise. You should actually try going to a gun show some time. They are amazing.
Answer: None
Wow! You agree with me! Never thought I would see the day!
3 d printing does not change any of that
I'm not saying that it does.
3D printing however does introduce a democratization of the craft, which is indeed very disruptive to the current manufacturing and regulatory infrastructure.
Have you ever tried to build your own car from scratch, literally from the ground up?
There are plenty of people who are capable of doing so, even manufacturing their own engines, even the engine blocks themselves.
There isn't a single square inch of this 1956 Chevy that is original, all of it was made by hand.
My brother built it and owns it.
![]()
The hurdle comes when they attempt to register them as roadworthy so that they can be driven on public roads.
Fortunately most states do indeed have a means of testing and approving such vehicles but if you ask a vehicle builder about the process, you will get an earful, because it's a bit of a nightmare.
Now do guns. Get the picture?
I'm not saying that it does.
3D printing however does introduce a democratization of the craft, which is indeed very disruptive to the current manufacturing and regulatory infrastructure.
Have you ever tried to build your own car from scratch, literally from the ground up?
There are plenty of people who are capable of doing so, even manufacturing their own engines, even the engine blocks themselves.
There isn't a single square inch of this 1956 Chevy that is original, all of it was made by hand.
My brother built it and owns it.
![]()
The hurdle comes when they attempt to register them as roadworthy so that they can be driven on public roads.
Fortunately most states do indeed have a means of testing and approving such vehicles but if you ask a vehicle builder about the process, you will get an earful, because it's a bit of a nightmare.
Now do guns. Get the picture?
there is no movement I am aware of trying to ban cars.
Your brother built that!?!?!?!? WOW!!!!! Amazing!!!
My first car was a 56 Chevy which looked just like that except the paint was gold and yellow.
there is no movement I am aware of trying to ban cars.
Its a non issue at this pointI wasn't talking about gun bans, I was talking about how 3D printing democratizes the manufacturing process, which throws a monkey wrench into the regulatory process that's in charge of "type acceptance" issues.
You no doubt are much more knowledgeable about type acceptance WRT guns than I am.
Type acceptance pops up in a lot of areas. The FCC requires that all transmitters over one tenth of a watt be "type accepted" in order to be sold and used. Medical equipment must be type accepted for use in clinics and hospitals.
Yep. 3 D priniting of guns changes nothing
Again we agree. The only time/place that 3D printing will become more significant than now is when guns are widely banned within the US, which will never happen. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see some of the existing bans rescinded in the next few years, which will make 3D printing even less relevant.
That said, there will always be a few hobbyists who enjoy making "dangerous" toys to play with.
Gun bans exist in other countries. This is a non issue everywhere