• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

3D-printed gun blueprints can be downloaded starting next month, ending lengthy legal battle

No, I've seen more than one, so more than zero. The capability is there. AR lowers are quite easy to make.

So more than zero and less than two. My god this is out of control. Lol
 
How many are made by a 3 d printer? Lol

None. Why would you ask?

To restate the conversation chain:
The concepts of 3D printed guns, or digitally controlled milling machines, or 80% receivers, or any other of the multiple methods which allow the hoi-polloi to create their own guns anonymously, will continue to be of low significance.

In truth they dont seem all that popular anywhere in the world despite bans

Except here in the US.

Nope not here

If you don't think 80% receivers are popular, I must conclude you haven't been to a gun show.

Of course I should have realized you would not be familiar with 80% receivers, and their popularity. I also should have realized that you know little about gun shows. FYI Every gun show I have been to in the past 5 years has had at least one booth selling 80% receivers, to say nothing of the thriving online business (last time I looked, the higher quality vendors were backlogged, quoting 6-8 week lead times for selected parts and jigs).

It was not my intention to embarass you by exposing your lack of expertise. You should actually try going to a gun show some time. They are amazing.
 
I suppose we can cross that bridge when we get there. I'm sure you would agree they are not a factor now.
Is gun powder and ammo 3D printed?

Gun POWDER is a chemical mixture usually composed of sulfur, charcoal and potassium nitrate, although there are other exotic formulations.
You don't "print" it, you mix it up. It's a recipe.
The ammo question doesn't really make sense.
If you can make your own gun, obviously it is possible to manufacture your own custom ammo, and a great many gun enthusiasts do exactly that.

Long before 3D printing existed, I watched a documentary about the FARC rebels in South America, circa 1990.
A KID, maybe twelve years old, made a very accurate and very capable rifle out of scrap metal parts using simple crude machine tools, in the middle of the jungle, by hand, completely from scratch. It gave excellent results.

Gunsmithing is a fine art and a science both.
 
Currently. Remember though, paper printers once cost thousands of dollars to.

The very first computer DVD burner cost $4,600.00. A year later that price was 900 bucks. Two years later it was $350 and five years later they were almost giving them away if you bought enough blanks, which by the way started at 25 bucks apiece before cratering at 25 CENTS apiece.
 
Again can they make gun powder and primers. To make that requires specialized training. Hell we control the raw materials to make meth NOW. I am not worried in the slightest. If this is a problem it is 50 years away at best.

We have children that need saving today. Gun control works

Excuse me, there's something like 20 or 30 different recipes for methamphetamine. Some of the raw ingredients might be the same but the precursors can vary widely. Some require more skill, some require more time and patience, some are much more unstable, some do not produce a pure product and some do not put out a large yield, but in the end you still wind up with meth.

It is extremely difficult to keep eyes on all the different chemical combinations and methodologies.
 
The concepts of 3D printed guns, or digitally controlled milling machines, or 80% receivers, or any other of the multiple methods which allow the hoi-polloi to create their own guns anonymously, will continue to be of low significance. Such techniques only become important when guns are banned outright. Since that will never happen, it will be a nice niche hobby for a few people who have a few extra bucks to spend.

In a few localities where specific firearms have been "banned", there is some growing interest in these methods. Since those bans are very likely to eventually be overturned by the courts, this marketplace is not apt to grow much.

Anti-gunners will always be inventing yet another scheme to magically make some firearms difficult/impossible to own or operate. Here in the US, these schemes are just not able to get widespread traction; they only are popular amongst a very small number of organizations, and those organizations have extremely limited political power.

As long as we, the law-abiding adult gun owners of the United States, remain vigilant against erosion of our gun rights, outright gun bans will remain a dream of a very small fringe.

Well, even barring all that, the fact is, confiscating the current existing 320 million guns is a logistical, mathematical and fiscal impossibility, end of story.
 
Actually, if the machine were set to patrician out the necessary chemicals and house it correctly. That could be done with relative ease, however the logistical start for that would be a nightmare.

I've heard of people printing the cartridges, but not the whole round.
 
Gun POWDER is a chemical mixture usually composed of sulfur, charcoal and potassium nitrate, although there are other exotic formulations.
You don't "print" it, you mix it up. It's a recipe.
The ammo question doesn't really make sense.
If you can make your own gun, obviously it is possible to manufacture your own custom ammo, and a great many gun enthusiasts do exactly that.

Long before 3D printing existed, I watched a documentary about the FARC rebels in South America, circa 1990.
A KID, maybe twelve years old, made a very accurate and very capable rifle out of scrap metal parts using simple crude machine tools, in the middle of the jungle, by hand, completely from scratch. It gave excellent results.

Gunsmithing is a fine art and a science both.

3 d printing does not change any of that
 
None. Why would you ask?

To restate the conversation chain:










Of course I should have realized you would not be familiar with 80% receivers, and their popularity. I also should have realized that you know little about gun shows. FYI Every gun show I have been to in the past 5 years has had at least one booth selling 80% receivers, to say nothing of the thriving online business (last time I looked, the higher quality vendors were backlogged, quoting 6-8 week lead times for selected parts and jigs).

It was not my intention to embarass you by exposing your lack of expertise. You should actually try going to a gun show some time. They are amazing.

Answer: None
 
In 2120...

Hey, man, I got these black market blueprints for a Gatling gun.
How do I know they're real?
*Youtube video of a conflict in the developing world*
How much?
 
3 d printing does not change any of that

I'm not saying that it does.
3D printing however does introduce a democratization of the craft, which is indeed very disruptive to the current manufacturing and regulatory infrastructure.

Have you ever tried to build your own car from scratch, literally from the ground up?
There are plenty of people who are capable of doing so, even manufacturing their own engines, even the engine blocks themselves.
There isn't a single square inch of this 1956 Chevy that is original, all of it was made by hand.
My brother built it and owns it.

2225990128_large.jpg



The hurdle comes when they attempt to register them as roadworthy so that they can be driven on public roads.

Fortunately most states do indeed have a means of testing and approving such vehicles but if you ask a vehicle builder about the process, you will get an earful, because it's a bit of a nightmare.

Now do guns. Get the picture?
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying that it does.
3D printing however does introduce a democratization of the craft, which is indeed very disruptive to the current manufacturing and regulatory infrastructure.

Have you ever tried to build your own car from scratch, literally from the ground up?
There are plenty of people who are capable of doing so, even manufacturing their own engines, even the engine blocks themselves.
There isn't a single square inch of this 1956 Chevy that is original, all of it was made by hand.
My brother built it and owns it.

2225990128_large.jpg



The hurdle comes when they attempt to register them as roadworthy so that they can be driven on public roads.

Fortunately most states do indeed have a means of testing and approving such vehicles but if you ask a vehicle builder about the process, you will get an earful, because it's a bit of a nightmare.

Now do guns. Get the picture?

there is no movement I am aware of trying to ban cars.
 
I'm not saying that it does.
3D printing however does introduce a democratization of the craft, which is indeed very disruptive to the current manufacturing and regulatory infrastructure.

Have you ever tried to build your own car from scratch, literally from the ground up?
There are plenty of people who are capable of doing so, even manufacturing their own engines, even the engine blocks themselves.
There isn't a single square inch of this 1956 Chevy that is original, all of it was made by hand.
My brother built it and owns it.

2225990128_large.jpg



The hurdle comes when they attempt to register them as roadworthy so that they can be driven on public roads.

Fortunately most states do indeed have a means of testing and approving such vehicles but if you ask a vehicle builder about the process, you will get an earful, because it's a bit of a nightmare.

Now do guns. Get the picture?

Your brother built that!?!?!?!? WOW!!!!! Amazing!!!

My first car was a 56 Chevy which looked just like that except the paint was gold and yellow.
 
there is no movement I am aware of trying to ban cars.

I wasn't talking about gun bans, I was talking about how 3D printing democratizes the manufacturing process, which throws a monkey wrench into the regulatory process that's in charge of "type acceptance" issues.
You no doubt are much more knowledgeable about type acceptance WRT guns than I am.

Type acceptance pops up in a lot of areas. The FCC requires that all transmitters over one tenth of a watt be "type accepted" in order to be sold and used. Medical equipment must be type accepted for use in clinics and hospitals.
 
Your brother built that!?!?!?!? WOW!!!!! Amazing!!!

My first car was a 56 Chevy which looked just like that except the paint was gold and yellow.

He bought the glass, the bumpers, headlights, tail lights, things like that.
But the engine block was custom made at a speed shop, he personally designed and made the intake and cylinder heads, the 4-speed auto transmission is a frankenstein combo of two disparate manufacturers, one of which is ZF out of Germany, he personally made most of the suspension parts and he and his son fabricated most of the body panels using original jigs.
I think they purchased the chrome trim, of course.
The entire interior is all custom fabricated and hand made and the wiring is all custom.

765 HP - 780 ft lbs torque, so it's almost "square" in terms of power output.
Yep, it's one fast mofo.

I like it but my favorite car of his was a 1969 Cuda S 340.
The S model did NOT have the giant "aquarium" rear window.

Like this, only his was copper color.

IMG_3403.JPG
 
there is no movement I am aware of trying to ban cars.

Not BAN car per se, but if you custom build your own car from the ground up, a lot of states are going to put you through the wringer trying to get it certified as both roadworthy and environmentally sound.

Even CALIFORNIA, which is a hotbed of custom car nuts, makes life awfully difficult for custom car builders.
In fact, so much so that car enthusiasts are locked in a never ending battle over it.

And strangely enough, it was during California's REPUBLICAN heyday that the move was afoot to destroy hundreds of thousands of old cars in this state. I remember Obama's junk buy back program but at least his program made exceptions for classic cars, they just wanted to scrap a lot of the crummier inefficient polluter mobiles that did not have a great deal of collector or intrinsic value.
California went WAY over that line, they wanted to try to scrap almost anything prior to the 1990's at one point, with no regard for the kind of cars they were.
They didn't succeed but it was quite a fight.
 
I wasn't talking about gun bans, I was talking about how 3D printing democratizes the manufacturing process, which throws a monkey wrench into the regulatory process that's in charge of "type acceptance" issues.
You no doubt are much more knowledgeable about type acceptance WRT guns than I am.

Type acceptance pops up in a lot of areas. The FCC requires that all transmitters over one tenth of a watt be "type accepted" in order to be sold and used. Medical equipment must be type accepted for use in clinics and hospitals.
Its a non issue at this point
 
Yep. 3 D priniting of guns changes nothing

Again we agree. The only time/place that 3D printing will become more significant than now is when guns are widely banned within the US, which will never happen. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see some of the existing bans rescinded in the next few years, which will make 3D printing even less relevant.

That said, there will always be a few hobbyists who enjoy making "dangerous" toys to play with.
 
Again we agree. The only time/place that 3D printing will become more significant than now is when guns are widely banned within the US, which will never happen. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see some of the existing bans rescinded in the next few years, which will make 3D printing even less relevant.

That said, there will always be a few hobbyists who enjoy making "dangerous" toys to play with.

Gun bans exist in other countries. This is a non issue everywhere
 
Gun bans exist in other countries. This is a non issue everywhere

You say that as if the gun owning culture in these "other countries" is similar to the gun owning culture here in the US. 3D printing of guns is already more popular here than just about anywhere. It is a moot point. As you and I amicably agreed earlier, the popularity of 3D gun printing will not flourish here, since widespread gun bans will never happen here.
 
Back
Top Bottom