• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2nd Amendment Run Amok

calamity said:
Do you really not know that quote?
Click to expand...

Of course I know the quote-it might be the most famous single quote from a supreme court justice ever-but it has zero relevance to your attempt to anger the sheep about certain firearms by trying to demonize those guns with a silly, irrelevant and meaningless term
 
calamity said:
Do you really not know that quote?
Click to expand...

Logical fallacy on your part, applying something with easily defined objective rules wouldn't need Potter's subjective judgment. So you punted and appealed to authority when your appeal to emotion OP failed.

Learn to ****ing make a logical argument.
 
TurtleDude said:
Of course I know the quote-it might be the most famous single quote from a supreme court justice ever-but it has zero relevance to your attempt to anger the sheep about certain firearms by trying to demonize those guns with a silly, irrelevant and meaningless term
Click to expand...

Good, then quit pretending you never heard it before.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Logical fallacy on your part, applying something with easily defined objective rules wouldn't need Potter's subjective judgment. So you punted and appealed to authority when your appeal to emotion OP failed.

Learn to ****ing make a logical argument.
Click to expand...

That's the stupidest post yet in this thread.

I didn't "punt" or "appeal to authority." I cracked a joke that the usual suspected people failed to get. I don't have to explain why.
 
calamity said:
That's the stupidest post yet in this thread.

I didn't "punt." I cracked a joke that the usual suspected people failed to get.
Click to expand...

Nah, you tried to make a point, failed again and are now trying to play it off as a joke. Try not to fail so badly when making a point.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Nah, you tried to make a point, failed again and are now trying to play it off as a joke. Try not to fail so badly when making a point.
Click to expand...

See what I mean?

calamity said:
That's the stupidest post yet in this thread.

I didn't "punt" or "appeal to authority." I cracked a joke that the usual suspected people failed to get. I don't have to explain why.
Click to expand...
 
DebateChallenge said:
Do you have a fire extinguisher in your house? No doubt you've at least got fire insurance, most people do. There is nothing wrong with being prepared for a house fire and by the same token there is nothing wrong with being prepared for a home invader. The fact of the matter is you're three times as likely to have your home invaded than you are of having a house fire.

There is nothing wrong with playing with guns as long as you play safely.

As for the gunman in the article, there are sick people in this world, your point?


So are you saying civilians shouldn't have access to a Sig Sauer XM17 9mm handgun? That is the standard sidearm of army officers so you can say its "military grade." Should a civilian be able to buy a Ontario MK 3 Navy Knife? It is a knife used by Navy SEALS so you can say its "military grade." And what is wrong with owning body armor? You certainly can't shoot and kill somebody with body armor. As for camo, are you now saying that clothing should be regulated? People shouldn't be able to buy certain clothes because of its color? That's absurd.
Click to expand...

Yes, absured is exactly the descriptor to apply to the nonsense being peddled here.
 
OpportunityCost said:
See what I mean? Completely incapable of making a logical point.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Haven't you been aroubd long enough to realise smears and trolling responses are all you get out of someone?
 
Chillfolks said:
Haven't you been aroubd long enough to realise smears and trolling responses are all you get out of someone?
Click to expand...

Oh, indeed, but the level of arrogance he is displaying means he gets his trolling turned upside down and show just how bad it is.
 
calamity said:
I get having a gun to defend loved ones and your home from ghastly intruders, even though the odds of that ever happening, for most of us, are slim to none. I certainly get being a female and carrying a gun to defend against sexual assault, a far more likely event. And, I guess, I can almost understand why a grown man needs to play with guns, like a kid playing cowboys and Indians. But, this....



Sorry, but there should be no right for civilians to have military grade weapons, body armor and camo. None.
Click to expand...


Sorry, but there should be no right for civilians to have military grade weapons, body armor and camo. None.
Click to expand...

Says you!


It was the hand gun that held the record for the most deaths(Virginia tech) until the summer of 2016

That evil Ak-47 came out during WWII was it?
 
Luther said:
Says you!


It was the hand gun that held the record for the most deaths(Virginia tech) until the summer of 2016

That evil Ak-47 came out during WWII was it?
Click to expand...

Of course, says me. No one else matters.
 
calamity said:
Of course, says me. No one else matters.
Click to expand...

But... this doesn't change(wink)

It was the hand gun that held the record for the most deaths(Virginia tech) until the summer of 2016

That evil Ak-47 came out during WWII was it?
Click to expand...
 
calamity said:
Good, then quit pretending you never heard it before.
Click to expand...

Stop lying-I said the quote has no relevance to this issue and Stewart would have never said the same thing when it comes to gun rights
 
Calamity keeps dodging my post, questions, and points.
 
Thanks for being so up-front and honest about yours and the left wing's true intentions; all the way down to banning camo clothing. Always good to know the enemies true intentions.
 
Waddy said:
Thanks for being so up-front and honest about yours and the left wing's true intentions; all the way down to banning camo clothing. Always good to know the enemies true intentions.
Click to expand...

I think the purpose of the comment is more to stir crap up than to state a position that is honestly held.
 
TurtleDude said:
I think the purpose of the comment is more to stir crap up than to state a position that is honestly held.
Click to expand...

Or maybe it was a "Freudian Slip", and those are her real intentions. Hmmmmmmmmm....
 
I wonder if Calamity just wants to ban "militarized" camo or if he wants the pink camo and Real Tree also outlawed.
 
calamity said:
I get having a gun to defend loved ones and your home from ghastly intruders, even though the odds of that ever happening, for most of us, are slim to none. I certainly get being a female and carrying a gun to defend against sexual assault, a far more likely event. And, I guess, I can almost understand why a grown man needs to play with guns, like a kid playing cowboys and Indians. But, this....



Sorry, but there should be no right for civilians to have military grade weapons, body armor and camo. None.
Click to expand...

The 2A doesn't provide guns for personal defense. I'm not saying you can't defend yourself with a gun, and I'm not saying there isn't a right to defend yourself, I'm saying it doesn't come from the Second Amendment.
 
Frigidweirdo said:
The 2A doesn't provide guns for personal defense. I'm not saying you can't defend yourself with a gun, and I'm not saying there isn't a right to defend yourself, I'm saying it doesn't come from the Second Amendment.
Click to expand...

This is interesting-what do you claim the second amendment does.
 
calamity said:
Sorry, but there should be no right for civilians to have military grade weapons, body armor and camo. None.
Click to expand...

Many hunters put on camo every hunting season. Is this a problem?

The Mossburg 500 is a military-grade weapon. Yet, many people own such a firearm. It is a general-purpose pump shotgun. What is your reason for denying people of the ability to possess such weapons?
 
Beowulf said:
Many hunters put on camo every hunting season. Is this a problem?

The Mossburg 500 is a military-grade weapon. Yet, many people own such a firearm. It is a general-purpose pump shotgun. What is your reason for denying people of the ability to possess such weapons?
Click to expand...

Trump won the election-gun owners were a major reason why, seems to be the most logical answer.
 
calamity said:
I get having a gun to defend loved ones and your home from ghastly intruders, even though the odds of that ever happening, for most of us, are slim to none. I certainly get being a female and carrying a gun to defend against sexual assault, a far more likely event. And, I guess, I can almost understand why a grown man needs to play with guns, like a kid playing cowboys and Indians. But, this....



Sorry, but there should be no right for civilians to have military grade weapons, body armor and camo. None.
Click to expand...
Your entire posting history is 1st Amendment run Amok. Now we have the 2nd running Amok. Got anything on the 3rd? :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom