- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 10,101
- Reaction score
- 2,990
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Thanks for proving my point. Well done.
That i'm fair? Thanks
Ask me again in 2 years time :2wave:
Thanks for proving my point. Well done.
No. Far from it.That i'm fair?
No. Far from it.
Wrong... because you wish to give The Obama a pass.Rightt, because i wish to give Obama some more time.
Rightt, because i wish to give Obama some more time. The same amount i gave Bush before i made my mind up on him?
Damn you are right. I am such a bitch. How dare i try and be fair between the two President.
Wrong... because you wish to give The Obama a pass.
That's your -current- excuse.No.
Because i wish to give Obama time.
That's your -current- excuse.
One can only imagine the excuses you'll give later.
I'll believe it when I see it; I'll bet the farm that it never happens.No, it is simple common sense.
Give Obama time, 7 months is hardly long
I don't think there is any upcoming President that can be worse than Bush.
When you get me a President who starts 2 more wars, then we'll talk
Hmm, terrorists attack America on 9/11 and you blame Bush for going to war to protect America? Also, a dangerous dictator fails to comply with numerous UN resolutions and whose actions had the potential to cause an even greater loss of life in America and you blame Bush?
Rightt, because i wish to give Obama some more time. The same amount i gave Bush before i made my mind up on him?
Damn you are right. I am such a bitch. How dare i try and be fair between the two President.
According to you. Your opinion doesn't make it so.As i said, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11
It was a war of CHOICE.
Hey!No thank you - in the end, Obama is making Bush look like a genius.
Wait, you blamed Bush for TWO wars... you cannot count the Iraq war twice... besides I already adressed the causes of Iraq war... and I did not specifically cite 9/11... rather I stated, the failure to follow UN resolutions and the threat that was posed to America.Oh thats right, stupid me
The people in the plane had links with Saudi Arabia but we invade Iraq ... Yup, perfect sense to me.
No, not by itself, but coupled with the threat posed to America, if Saddam had been trying to aquire WMD's - unfortuntaly for Saddam, he was too successful in trying to appear as if he was hiding weapons...Oh please.
We are going about UN resolutions now? Is that now the basis of a US attack on a country?
Do they pose a threat to the US?Great.
When do i expect to see US Soldiers in Darfur then?
Do they pose a threat to the US?
...and as I stated, you referred to two wars; I cited 9/11 as the impetus for the Afghanistan War and Saddam's failure to comply with UN resolutions tied with the threat he posed if he had WMDs as some of the contributing reasons for Iraq....As i said, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11
It was a war of CHOICE.
In the end, I do agree with you on one point - the Iraq war was a war of choice - Saddam's choice.
No threat to US.
Unless you include invisible WMD's. Yup, i heard the invisible ones could take out half of America.
Saddam should have been left alone.
same as America could not afford to be wrong with Iraq.
No one is arguing whether or not the Afghanistan War could or could not be counted as a war - rather you blamed President Bush for starting that war when in fact, America was attacked first on 9/11 and it was that event that directly led to the Afghan War.Afhanistan perhaps wasn't but it still counts as a war.
Being wrong and being stupid are not synonymous - you were wrong to blame Bush for the Afghan War - are you arguing that becuase you are wrong, you are stupid too?Iraq was a war of choice and stupidity for the 'coalition of the willing'
I disagree.As i said and always have said, we should have left Iraq alone and Saddam
I disagree.
Well of course you disagree.
Okay, i'll admit i am wrong to blame Bush for Afghanistan but i will blame Bush for Iraq.
9/11 led to Afghanistan fair enough
But Bush must have been drunk when he authorised force in Iraq.