• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

100% guilty

as someone who currently claims to be "very conservative", who are you hoping wins the 2020 election? and pattern and practice is a normal issue when discussing things like impeachment

"Conservative" doesn't mean anything in the Trump era. (Don't you remember me?)

I don't know who will be on the ballot. I won't be voting for Trump.
 
"Conservative" doesn't mean anything in the Trump era. (Don't you remember me?)

I don't know who will be on the ballot. I won't be voting for Trump.

I knew that.
 
what did your earlier post say about what would cause a civil war?

I said he would try to incite one. I don't think he would succeed.

Rednecks aren't going to take over Peoria, let alone Chicago. :lol:
 
and this hate group won't impeach him, talking about selling out your country for power and money.

Two years ago, the Washington Post added a new slogan on top of their print copy news. It's an old saying by Bob Woodward who, as most know, was one of the Post reporters that broke the Watergate conspiracy story. 'Democracy Dies in Darkness'. But Bob Woodward was not the original author, he just tweaked it.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the U.S. Justice Department began deporting Arab and Muslim immigrants in secret court proceedings, which The Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News, the ACLU, and U.S. Rep. John Conyers challenged in federal court, arguing it was a violation of the First Amendment to close immigration hearings to the public.

In his decision, Justice Damon Keith wrote that "Democracy dies in the dark." The phrase was later adopted by The Washington Post for use as its slogan, who tweaked it to "Democracy Dies in Darkness" in 2017.

My point is this. Our country, our democracy, was in jeopardy because of the silence of republicans, because of the darkness they cast upon the impeachment trial. There's still an uphill battle, but today there's evidence that some republicans will do their job and vote to have John Bolton testify. So, there's some light being cast upon that darkness, which is good for our country's democracy.

Regarding John Bolton, he's a vile creature and in my opinion and co-conspirator. Not because he had knowledge of all of that and didn't like it and complained about 'this drug deal', but because he never had enough care about our country's national security -- even though he was our U.S. National Security Advisor -- to come forward willingly to report this perilous abuse of power. He thought only of himself and how he could profit by selling a book. He's an accomplice to all of it in my opinion and should stand with others to face indictments.

It appears that a door has been cracked open with the news of Bolton's manuscript and just maybe a ray of light has entered this dark place this country is in.
 
Two years ago, the Washington Post added a new slogan on top of their print copy news. It's an old saying by Bob Woodward who, as most know, was one of the Post reporters that broke the Watergate conspiracy story. 'Democracy Dies in Darkness'. But Bob Woodward was not the original author, he just tweaked it.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the U.S. Justice Department began deporting Arab and Muslim immigrants in secret court proceedings, which The Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News, the ACLU, and U.S. Rep. John Conyers challenged in federal court, arguing it was a violation of the First Amendment to close immigration hearings to the public.

In his decision, Justice Damon Keith wrote that "Democracy dies in the dark." The phrase was later adopted by The Washington Post for use as its slogan, who tweaked it to "Democracy Dies in Darkness" in 2017.

My point is this. Our country, our democracy, was in jeopardy because of the silence of republicans, because of the darkness they cast upon the impeachment trial. There's still an uphill battle, but today there's evidence that some republicans will do their job and vote to have John Bolton testify. So, there's some light being cast upon that darkness, which is good for our country's democracy.

Regarding John Bolton, he's a vile creature and in my opinion and co-conspirator. Not because he had knowledge of all of that and didn't like it and complained about 'this drug deal', but because he never had enough care about our country's national security -- even though he was our U.S. National Security Advisor -- to come forward willingly to report this perilous abuse of power. He thought only of himself and how he could profit by selling a book. He's an accomplice to all of it in my opinion and should stand with others to face indictments.

It appears that a door has been cracked open with the news of Bolton's manuscript and just maybe a ray of light has entered this dark place this country is in.

Damon Keith was never a "justice".
 
and this hate group won't impeach him, talking about selling out your country for power and money.

Do you think repeating "Trump is guilty " every day for the t ,what past 2 years? is a convincing argument?

LAFFRIOT

{See sig line}
 
Two .

In his decision, Justice Damon Keith wrote that "Democracy dies in the dark." The phrase was later adopted by The Washington Post for use as its slogan, who tweaked it to "Democracy Dies in Darkness" in 2017.

My point is this. Our country, our democracy, was in jeopardy because of the silence of republicans, because of the darkness they cast upon the impeachment trial. There's still an uphill battle, but today there's evidence that some republicans will do their job and vote to have John Bolton testify. So, there's some light being cast upon that darkness, which is good for our country's democracy.

Regarding John Bolton, he's a vile creature and in my opinion and co-conspirator. Not because he had knowledge of all of that and didn't like it and complained about 'this drug deal', but because he never had enough care about our country's national security -- even though he was our U.S. National Security Advisor -- to come forward willingly to report this perilous abuse of power. He thought only of himself and how he could profit by selling a book. He's an accomplice to all of it in my opinion and should stand with others to face indictments.

It appears that a door has been cracked open with the news of Bolton's manuscript and just maybe a ray of light has entered this dark place this country is in.

(Cue melodramatic music)

LAFFRIOT
This kind of over-top silliness is why us normals laugh at you TDSers
 
What is he going to do? Have Senators whacked?

This man has power because the Republican party gave it to him. They have the ability to take it away too if they grow some spines.

It is not trump republicans fear. It is his deplorable voter base. Republican goes against trump then he loses the majority of the republican voter base. Those deplorables who worship trump have republicans by the &@!!$
 
Damn ken starr could put a meth head to sleep!!!
 
Damon Keith was never a "justice".

Okay, Damon Keith was a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

What else you got?
 
I haven't seen anything credible yet. Just conspiracy theory propaganda.

And a hold lot of lies repeated over and over again by the cultists, regardless of the fact they know them to be lies...
 
TDS is what has motivated hundreds of Rant about Trump threads on this board. Its the same caterwauling nonsense over and over and over and over

And, I repeat, "TDS" is not an argument, it's an emotional response, and thus not a merity worthy rebuttal.

As such, it's an incompetent rebuttal.

Bone up on Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit for improving your knowledge of how to avoid specious reasoning, and study proper debate techniques.


This is not to say some on my side engage in same, but two wrongs do not make right. Moreover, we're not making the "TDS" argument, which is incompetent.
 
Who can tell me why this post is the kind you read on facebook?

Numerous news journals have reported this.

I do not have an FB page. Even if it were mentioned on FB, that would be irrelevant. Either it's a fact or it's not.

Disprove it, if you can. No one is stopping you, but I would advise against specious reasoning that you apparently are given to.
 
and this hate group won't impeach him, talking about selling out your country for power and money.

FYI: Trump has already been impeached.
 
Okay, Damon Keith was a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

What else you got?

he was well known as being a hard core lefty. that he would back up Conyers was pretty much a given.
 
I know you want this to be true. That doesn't make it so.
Wanting is not necessary. It's the facts as we know them.

You can make a valid point that Obama is not directly linked to the spying scandal, yet. He may never be, but his administration was doing it and his people that have been fingered by the IG report. That was enough during Watergate.
 
TDS is not an argument. It is a sentiment. Your comment is emotional, not rational. Learn proper debate techniques, and while you are at it, study the Carl Sagan Baloney Detection Kit to bone up on specious reasoning recognition.
It's a meme and the behavior is cultish. It was cultish 12 years ago when Obama was first running, but it wasn't focused on Trump yet.
 
Numerous news journals have reported this.

I do not have an FB page. Even if it were mentioned on FB, that would be irrelevant. Either it's a fact or it's not.

Disprove it, if you can. No one is stopping you, but I would advise against specious reasoning that you apparently are given to.

Oh 13 embassies were attacked but thats not the issue. It's the glaring part about your confusing the issue with Benghazi as being that it was attacked and not that it was attacked and Obama did nothing and then lied about it afterwards. In the 13 attacks you mentioned there was no coverup.
 
Oh 13 embassies were attacked but thats not the issue. It's the glaring part about your confusing the issue with Benghazi as being that it was attacked and not that it was attacked and Obama did nothing and then lied about it afterwards. In the 13 attacks you mentioned there was no coverup.

Benghazi, likewise, is not the issue.

If you want to start a thread on Obama, do so, noting that there were eight investigations on Benghazi spanning four years and so I am not even going to get into the simplistic nature of your comment, which omits TONS plus years of context, so much so the responding to your comment would be a waste of time, and this idea that someone has to conform to your sophomoric version of history in order to make a valid comment about the Trump fans on this forum is utterly ridiculous.

In short, your comment is deflection, not augmentation or contribution or in any way forwarding the debate.
 
Benghazi, likewise, is not the issue.

If you want to start a thread on Obama, do so, noting that there were eight investigations on Benghazi spanning four years and so I am not even going to get into the simplistic nature of your comment, which omits TONS plus years of context, so much so the responding to your comment would be a waste of time, and this idea that someone has to conform to your sophomoric version of history in order to make a valid comment about the Trump fans on this forum is utterly ridiculous.

In short, your comment is deflection, not augmentation or contribution or in any way forwarding the debate.
lol...Your post brought up the 13 embassy attacks...now you cut and run unable to admit that benghazi was about the cover up not the attacks. Spare me your sophomoric BS. You just demonstrated that perfectly.
 
lol...Your post brought up the 13 embassy attacks...now you cut and run unable to admit that benghazi was about the cover up not the attacks. Spare me your sophomoric BS. You just demonstrated that perfectly.


Your rebuttal to jbander was sophomoric.

As in stupid.


Nothing changes that fact.


Nothing.
 
Back
Top Bottom