• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sexual deviant's flag flown over State Capitol

Status
Not open for further replies.
Eriech said:
Should you be able to burn a gay flag in protest?

Suspect charged with setting fire to Harlem bar'''s pride flags

This guy burned someone else's flag and should be prosecuted but what if he had brought his own?

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

The suspect was charged with vandalism and arson. By the time his legal aid attorney represents him at the arraignment hearing, a plea will be entered and agreed to for being a public nuisance. $100 fine and a cd (conditional discharge.) Meaning if he doesn't get convicted of another crime for six months, his record will be expunged.

Had he been caught urinating on that flag, he would have received a $250 fine for urinating in public.

The flag wasn't the issue, just a minor causation for poor public behavior. Meanwhile there are no fines, no violations of law other than littering, for the bags filled with dog turds repeatedly left in the doorway of that bar. Apparently, that bar is not appreciated in that neighborhood. Kind of shocking, considering the status of other gin mills in the neighborhood. Two are operating with suspended licenses, another is the site of numerous brawls, inhabited by alcoholics, burnt out hookers, and assorted low life criminals. Neighborhood drives to shutter all three have obviously failed.
 
MrWonka said:
Because oddly enough pro-life people generally don't have to worry about being beaten to death by pro-choice people whereas gay people do have to worry about being beaten to death by straight people.

There's so many ****ty obnoxious pro-life people in the country that we don't need to have a special week or month to remind anybody that you're not going anywhere no matter how much we'd all like you to.
Click to expand...

Fyi.

Leftist crowd just brain hemorrhaged a gay conservative this month....



Right now it looks like progressive leftists want to beat/kill gays and babies.

Start over.
 
Lisa said:
Pro-life people should support LGBT couples because if there is one group of people who will never have abortions it is gays, lesbians and the transgendered.
Click to expand...

But most of them won't, because anti-choiceism is all about control, not reducing the number of abortions.
 
Eriech said:
"Anti-choiceism"

Lol

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Anti-choiceists should be all for gay marriage and more birth control, because that would get the number of abortions down. :thumbs:
 
CitizenBasehead said:
I'm sure that never happened to most people.



:lamo

I don't like to dismiss antidotal evidence but if a person has a victimhood complex, I would take everything they say with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...

Thats not really an anecdote but it does happen to children who come out as gay. Its more of a “this happens” than a “how often something happens”.
 
LittleNipper said:
Perhaps it in fact has nothing to do with what the "gay" individual believes others are thinking, but what that individual knows to be true about his or her own disappointment in one's self! What "gays " seem always seeking is acceptance which alludes the deep seated feeling that things could have been different...
Click to expand...

Its more of a “i am valid, i deserve to live. If you disagree, ***** you”
 
bomberfox said:
Thats not really an anecdote but it does happen to children who come out as gay.
Click to expand...

an·ec·dote

noun

an account regarded as unreliable or hearsay.

It is.

Its more of a “this happens”.
Click to expand...

No its not. Unless you can show me police or child protection services reports that back up this claim, I'm going to say your full of it.

I talk to online activist a lot and with these people it's more about the narrative than facts.
 
CitizenBasehead said:
an·ec·dote

noun

an account regarded as unreliable or hearsay.

It is.



No its not. Unless you can show me police or child protection services reports that back up this claim, I'm going to say your full of it.

I talk to online activist a lot and with these people it's more about the narrative than facts.
Click to expand...

Thats... nice... dont care but thats... nice...
 
bomberfox said:
Its more of a “i am valid, i deserve to live. If you disagree, ***** you”
Click to expand...

michael alig dasmond ernie glam.jpg

Convicted murder Sitting next to desmond, under a painting with rohypnol written on it.

I can tell you're a political activist but people have valid claims when they complain about how disgusting some of these people are. Trying to stick up for anyone and everyone in the LGBT community, will end up hurting your cause.
 
CitizenBasehead said:
View attachment 67259695

Convicted murder Sitting next to desmond, under a painting with rohypnol written on it.

I can tell you're a political activist but people have valid claims when they complain about how disgusting some of these people are. Trying to stick up for anyone and everyone in the LGBT community, will end up hurting your cause.
Click to expand...

Im talking about human rights not anyone in particular. ***** your concern trolling.
 
bomberfox said:
Im talking about human rights not anyone in particular. ***** your concern trolling.
Click to expand...

How is this about hueman rights? People don't like the LGBTQ+ flag because it's all about forcing people to accept degenerates along normal gays.
 
CitizenBasehead said:
How is this about hueman rights? People don't like the LGBTQ+ flag because it's all about forcing people to accept degenerates along normal gays.
Click to expand...

No it isnt. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and your concern trolling is obvious. Im done with you.
 
Phys251 said:
But most of them won't, because anti-choiceism is all about control, not reducing the number of abortions.
Click to expand...

Anti-choice is conservative religions attempt to reassert power and turn back the clock to a mythical time when only WASP males had rights, and everyone else knew that their place as second-class citizens. Women and blacks were their property and LGBT people were to stay in the closet. They want to shame women for having and daring to enjoy sex.

These religious authoritarians don't give a flip about that child once it breathes air and has physical needs such as food, clothes, healthcare, education, and a home. There are more properly known as forced-birth conservatives because their concern for that infant ends at the start of the 4th trimester. They only care about them in the future when they can be sent off to fight.
 
johnwk said:
Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
Click to expand...

Sexual deviants?
 
johnwk said:
Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
Click to expand...

You should write him a complaint letter or email. Good luck.
 
johnwk said:
The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
Click to expand...

You should understand the reason behind the guarantees of the Bill of Rights and the idea that the majority do not get to decide the rights that a minority enjoys. The idea that you are trying to support is the tyranny of the majority and it is the core idea of what DOMA laws were struck down by the SCOTUS in both Windsor vs. US and Obergfell v. Hodges.

We all have equal rights so others do not have to ask for their rights because you do not have the right to the ability to deny others the rights that you already enjoy. I do wonder why you are so uptight about LGBT people because a rational person would not spend their time 0bcessed with the affairs of consenting adults.
 
Lisa said:
a rational person would not spend their time 0bcessed with the affairs of consenting adults.
Click to expand...

Well, in Ancient Greece most consented to raping young boys, and elsewhere in history we find any consenting perversion you can imagine. Nazis were consenting Germans for 12 years! The modern liberal idea of consenting love in the black community destroyed love and family and created the school to prison pipeline. Now do you understand?
 
Lisa said:
You should understand the reason behind the guarantees of the Bill of Rights.
Click to expand...

The reason was to protect us from liberal govt-right? I'm sure they didn't think the Girl Scouts would take away our rights?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom