• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay people are better at sex, study finds

Deuce said:
The takeaway here is that HIV transmission rates are the only thing keeping lefty louie here from signing up for the other team?
Click to expand...

Finally, a member with a sense of humor.

I suspect what keeps me as a hetero is desire, I desire female attention when it comes to sex. I assume if I desired male attention to those details I'd go that route.
 
Dragonfly said:
Ladies, know what pops your cork. (god won't send you to hell for knowing your own body)
Then, teach your man how to do it.
Click to expand...

The thing that made me laugh the most is, what do straight people even DO with "Gay people are better at sex"??
What I mean is, as a straight person, what am I supposed to do with that info?
I can't suddenly "convert to being gay" any more than a gay person could suddenly switch to being straight.

Wait, I know!
If gay people are enjoying sex more, then it means that straight people are missing out at straight sex and they have a lot to look forward to, in the world of straight style sex, that is.
Hey, that alone is a good thing, right?

Yes, Dragonfly, thanks for nailing it. Starting off the evening romp by saying clitoral stimulation is "Ringing Satan's Doorbell" is probably the worst way to go, so drop your Puritan hangups, dispense with your embarrassment and shyness, and learn to talk dirty to your man. Men, learn to appreciate that when your lady talks dirty to you, she wants you to know more about what makes her happy. Be the willing student.
If you're still out there playing the field, you're going to be spending more time in "school" because every woman is somewhat different, and even the same woman's ideas about what floats her boat may even change over time, too.
Learning IS FUN at "The Learning Annex" so just remember that learning is also fun at the Sexy Annex, too.
 
When Gay people make babies from sexual intercourse, then it could be argued that their sex is better. The reason I say this is more complex than at first glance. Making a baby from sexual intercourse is a complete experience that gay people often do not experience. Straight couples whom have sex and love each other for the purpose of making an off-spring is monumentally better both mentally and physically in my opinion.

I'm not taking away from gay relationships as many may have good sex through clitoral and prostate stimulation, but the act of making a baby with someone you love would be far more pleasurable for me.
 
TheGoverness said:
Article Here.







Hell yes we are. :2razz:
Click to expand...

Gay people are gay people.

They are no better at anything than non gay people.

Fun article though. ;)

Side note: My lesbian neighbor friends (couple) down the street are moving away. I'm losing two of the worst sailing, and best drinking pals I ever had.
 
Cable_Extreme said:
When Gay people make babies from sexual intercourse, then it could be argued that their sex is better. The reason I say this is more complex than at first glance. Making a baby from sexual intercourse is a complete experience that gay people often do not experience. Straight couples whom have sex and love each other for the purpose of making an off-spring is monumentally better both mentally and physically in my opinion.

I'm not taking away from gay relationships as many may have good sex through clitoral and prostate stimulation, but the act of making a baby with someone you love would be far more pleasurable for me.
Click to expand...

I don't really see how not being able to conceive children together, somehow makes not as good as straight sex. I've made love w/ my gf a whole lot over this winter break. And everytime has been amazing. I don't need a baby to have good sex, nor to make me feel 'complete'.

And that's actually a benefit for me, because I won't have to worry about ever getting pregnant.
 
TheGoverness said:
I don't really see how not being able to conceive children together, somehow makes not as good as straight sex. I've made love w/ my gf a whole lot over this winter break. And everytime has been amazing. I don't need a baby to have good sex, nor to make me feel 'complete'.

And that's actually a benefit for me, because I won't have to worry about ever getting pregnant.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you have great sex, but how can it be scientifically determined to be greater than straight sex? Studies based on anecdotal accounts aren't very accurate as the idea of great sex differs between different people.

my idea of great sex is having sex with a woman I truly love for the purpose of making a baby. It is an act of uniting us in the future with a child that will bring us closer together forever. Apparently you don't share that view which proves my point.
 
Cable_Extreme said:
I'm sure you have great sex, but how can it be scientifically determined to be greater than straight sex? Studies based on anecdotal accounts aren't very accurate as the idea of great sex differs between different people.

my idea of great sex is having sex with a woman I truly love for the purpose of making a baby. It is an act of uniting us in the future with a child that will bring us closer together forever. Apparently you don't share that view which proves my point.
Click to expand...

It isn't. I mostly posted this as a fun thing, not that I 100% agree with it. You're right: everyone has their own opinion on what "good sex" is.
 
Conceiving a child with someone you love is incredibly painful and disappointing.
 
TheGoverness said:
Article Here.







Hell yes we are. :2razz:
Click to expand...


Lesbian and bisexual women also have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women.

Heterosexual men have higher obesity rate than homosexual women.

No surprise because I know heterosexuality, male homosexuality, lesbianism are all addictions. Male homosexuals are disproportionately focused on their bodies and the bodies of men (not the inner person) because men are very visual in their sexual arousal. Lesbians unlike heterosexual women don't have to worry about attracting men who are visually aroused people. Heterosexual women care more about men high social status and money than good physiques.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/02/why-the-federal-government-spent-3-million-to-study-lesbian-obesity/?utm_term=.194d37b11d46

A summary of the research project said that nearly three-quarters of lesbians are overweight or obese. The rate is 25 percent higher than heterosexual females and almost “double the obesity risk of gay men,” the summary said.

The researchers, led by an epidemiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, have already concluded that lower athletic self-esteem among lesbians may lead to higher rates of obesity and that lesbians are more likely to see themselves at a healthy weight when they are not, according to the Free Beacon report.
Click to expand...


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/13/lesbian-obesity-medical-study_n_2868391.html

QUEER VOICES 03/13/2013 01:58 pm ET Updated Feb 02, 2016

‘Lesbian Obesity Study’ Significance, Outcome Divides Media Outlets
Click to expand...



https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1874217/

Overweight and Obesity in Sexual-Minority Women: Evidence From Population-Based Data

Ulrike Boehmer, PhD, Deborah J. Bowen, PhD, and Greta R. Bauer, PhD
Click to expand...

Conclusions. Lesbian women have a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity than all other female sexual orientation groups. This finding suggests that lesbians are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality linked to overweight and obesity. This finding also highlights the need for interventions within this population.
Click to expand...


The Washington Post and Huff Post have sought to depict conclusions of the study on lesbian obesity as biased and something not an indication of immoral behaviors. But Nota Bene. Not one chance in hell would ever those liberal media sources do the symmetrical for black men having sex with black men who do not ID as gay and also have HIV.




As an example this 50ish year-old homosexual man (he says in the video he is homosexual) that has shot synthol into his chest. Basically an oil mixed with alcohol and other things. (His skin moves in the center of his chest, too, is an unhealthy and unattractive way to me.)

 
Last edited:
So are Chimps.
 
Cable_Extreme said:
When Gay people make babies from sexual intercourse, then it could be argued that their sex is better. The reason I say this is more complex than at first glance. Making a baby from sexual intercourse is a complete experience that gay people often do not experience. Straight couples whom have sex and love each other for the purpose of making an off-spring is monumentally better both mentally and physically in my opinion.

I'm not taking away from gay relationships as many may have good sex through clitoral and prostate stimulation, but the act of making a baby with someone you love would be far more pleasurable for me.
Click to expand...
So the best sex is the kind where a child is produced?

Huh...I wonder if girls that are carrying their father's or uncle's or other rape assailant's baby agree.
 
Makes sense, they have the same parts that their lover has
 
FastPace said:
No surprise because I know heterosexuality, male homosexuality, lesbianism are all addictions.
Click to expand...
Sexual orientation is an addiction or only when it's homosexual it's an addiction?

Just trying to understand you here.

Further I don't know how you become addicted to homosexuality seems like kind of an odd thing to say.

Do you mean to say that people are addicted to sex with the same sex or that they're addicted to being attracted to the same sex? Or do you mean to say they're addicted to not being attracted to the opposite sex?

It's a bizarre statement.
 
If I had unfiltered access to the parts I'd be damned better at it too.
 
Yea right, disgusting.
 
CLAX1911 said:
So the best sex is the kind where a child is produced?

Huh...I wonder if girls that are carrying their father's or uncle's or other rape assailant's baby agree.
Click to expand...

I believe the intent of the initiating poster underlying this concept, was to speak about a context of a loving relationship with a goal of procreation. Certainly, no forced (and not necessarily physically forced) sexual penetration under most, if not all such circumstances, would be expected to result in a quality sexual experience for the victim of that force.

You might also keep in mind, history has many instances of incestuous relationships being initiated and maintained by the younger intimate partner. These relationships do not always fit the definitions of rape as we currently see as popularly agreed upon today, nor do they account for other cultures with different sets of mores and morals. i.e. the Pharonic practice of maintaining pure blood lines of the ruling living god. As an immediate example of the latter, one needs only view the term "blue bloods" as representative of the incestuous practices of European nobility for centuries. There's underlying reasons why hemophilia was known as the curse of the nobility, and incest was part and parcel to the problem. Without pointing a finger, we had a president who was suspected of having married a natural daughter, meaning she was born out of wedlock and he was the father.
 
OldFatGuy said:
I believe the intent of the initiating poster underlying this concept, was to speak about a context of a loving relationship with a goal of procreation.
Click to expand...
so not for couples who have already had children?

Certainly, no forced (and not necessarily physically forced) sexual penetration under most, if not all such circumstances, would be expected to result in a quality sexual experience for the victim of that force.
Click to expand...
but they do have the capacity to produce a child and that was the only criteria gave.

You might also keep in mind, history has many instances of incestuous relationships being initiated and maintained by the younger intimate partner. These relationships do not always fit the definitions of rape as we currently see as popularly agreed upon today, nor do they account for other cultures with different sets of mores and morals. i.e. the Pharonic practice of maintaining pure blood lines of the ruling living god. As an immediate example of the latter, one needs only view the term "blue bloods" as representative of the incestuous practices of European nobility for centuries. There's underlying reasons why hemophilia was known as the curse of the nobility, and incest was part and parcel to the problem. Without pointing a finger, we had a president who was suspected of having married a natural daughter, meaning she was born out of wedlock and he was the father.
Click to expand...
and such relationships are healthy?
 
Cable_Extreme said:
When Gay people make babies from sexual intercourse, then it could be argued that their sex is better. The reason I say this is more complex than at first glance. Making a baby from sexual intercourse is a complete experience that gay people often do not experience. Straight couples whom have sex and love each other for the purpose of making an off-spring is monumentally better both mentally and physically in my opinion.

I'm not taking away from gay relationships as many may have good sex through clitoral and prostate stimulation, but the act of making a baby with someone you love would be far more pleasurable for me.
Click to expand...

I honestly couldn't tell the difference between the times having sex got my partner pregnant and when it didn't. By what measure would that love making have been better, especially considering all pregnancies have so far have ended in miscarriage?
 
CLAX1911 said:
so not for couples who have already had children?

but they do have the capacity to produce a child and that was the only criteria gave.

and such relationships are healthy?
Click to expand...

Step back. Explaining what I perceive to be the intent of another poster doesn't signify my personal agreement.

I know of couples who were never capable of having children, for all sorts of reasons. I make no assumptions about the quality of their sex lives. Nor do I need any criteria to see what isn't there. Call me blind, but the blind man could see when he picked up the hammer and saw.

Neither my wife or I are of an age when we want more children, or could physically have them. I think, and I believe my wife thinks, we have a terrific sex life. Especially after we grease up and hang upside down from the trapeze, holding on to each other, if we can, for dear life. :lamo @ me (what a dumbass image that makes)

I think I'll write a song about this "Ode to bacon grease."

Can you prove why those relationships might not be healthy? Stop making assumptions. Human sexuality is far too complex to define or explain. Your morality is not mine, and vice versa. Neither is superior to the other.

I know of a woman who married her rapist. She pursued him. Now, more than 25 years and two well adjusted kids later, they are happy together. Who are to claim they have not had and are still having a successful healthy relationship? I can show you many others, married for far less time who hate their spouses and their spouses hate them. Many more where those relationships crumbled into divorce. Yet you, in your arrogance, think you have the answers? Stop lying to yourself. You'll sleep better.

Some others who have posted opinions in this thread should also pay attention to the prior two paragraphs.
 
OldFatGuy said:
Step back. Explaining what I perceive to be the intent of another poster doesn't signify my personal agreement.
Click to expand...
Oh, my apologies. I understand your interpretation.

I know of couples who were never capable of having children, for all sorts of reasons. I make no assumptions about the quality of their sex lives. Nor do I need any criteria to see what isn't there. Call me blind, but the blind man could see when he picked up the hammer and saw.

Neither my wife or I are of an age when we want more children, or could physically have them. I think, and I believe my wife thinks, we have a terrific sex life. Especially after we grease up and hang upside down from the trapeze, holding on to each other, if we can, for dear life. :lamo @ me (what a dumbass image that makes)

I think I'll write a song about this "Ode to bacon grease."
Click to expand...
All I can think of is keeping the dog away with all that bacon grease.

Can you prove why those relationships might not be healthy? Stop making assumptions. Human sexuality is far too complex to define or explain. Your morality is not mine, and vice versa. Neither is superior to the other.
Click to expand...
Yes. Inbreeding is never healthy. I'm not a moral relativist. There is morality that is superior to others.

I know of a woman who married her rapist. She pursued him. Now, more than 25 years and two well adjusted kids later, they are happy together. Who are to claim they have not had and are still having a successful healthy relationship? I can show you many others, married for far less time who hate their spouses and their spouses hate them. Many more where those relationships crumbled into divorce. Yet you, in your arrogance, think you have the answers? Stop lying to yourself. You'll sleep better.
Click to expand...
I think you addressed this to the wrong person. My first post that you responded to was making this same point.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Oh, my apologies. I understand your interpretation.

All I can think of is keeping the dog away with all that bacon grease.

Yes. Inbreeding is never healthy. I'm not a moral relativist. There is morality that is superior to others.

I think you addressed this to the wrong person. My first post that you responded to was making this same point.
Click to expand...

No apologies necessary. All fair enough, but there's no way to keep the dog away from the bacon grease. He's dumb and lazy, but a sneaky old piece of work. At least he doesn't roll in it like he does with dead fish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom