• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay people are better at sex, study finds

Dragonfly said:
I'm guessing lesbians are more open to communication with each other.
Not shocking since they're more than likely not hung-up on religious issues.
Click to expand...

I think you're overgeneralizing here, particularly in your second statement. Whether somebody is "hung up on religious issues" depends on how that person was reared. If taught that homosexuality is an abomination, someone who is gay is likely to struggle more than straights over "religious issues" and have to work harder to be healthy emotionally and spiritually.
 
Apostle of Marx said:
LMAO. Classic straight man.

Surely "better" means how fulfilling you are for the other person(s), not how often you cum. The fact straight men pretty much orgasm 100% of the time doesn't means your better at sex. It just means you cum.
Click to expand...

Well isnt that the point of sex?
 
Crovax said:
Well isnt that the point of sex?
Click to expand...

Well, it's always better when both people do, but certainly not required to have a good time...at least for the lucky one.
 
Crovax said:
Well isnt that the point of sex?
Click to expand...

This is a joke? I can't tell.

I mean, if you view sex solely on the basis that you have cum, then I guess that's the point. I feel for your sexual partners though. I was taught that the point of sex was to have and to create pleasure. I wouldn't consider it 'good sex' if I hadn't fulfilled my sexual partner. But I guess that's just me...
 
How can a study possibly act like it can say such a thing? Sex is based on the perception of the individual, some like it hard, soft, wet, dry, upside down, in the air, etc....
 
Marco Montana said:
How can a study possibly act like it can say such a thing? Sex is based on the perception of the individual, some like it hard, soft, wet, dry, upside down, in the air, etc....
Click to expand...

In the air? You've got a crazy sex life, dude! :mrgreen:
 
CLAX1911 said:
Perhaps yours is simply mundane. Though the trapeze is an odd place to want it.
Click to expand...

Nah. My sex life is pretty damn good at the moment. :2razz:

It's just that trapezes are not involved in my love-making. :)
 
Kind of sad that they define "better sex" as orgasm focused. Yeah orgasms are great but that's not all sex is about.

Typical genital focused non-sense.
 
More practice Leeds to better results. Look, being promiscuous is a good thing, until you get aids and die.
 
Crovax said:
So Heterosexual men orgasm 95% of the time but gay men only orgasm 89% of the time? Seems like heterosexuals win that one :shrug:
Click to expand...

The women don't win that, no.
 
Northern Light said:
Kind of sad that they define "better sex" as orgasm focused. Yeah orgasms are great but that's not all sex is about.

Typical genital focused non-sense.
Click to expand...

It's not completely wrong, it's just an oversimplification.
 
It strikes me as likely that those who are different and who have now paid a price for that erotic difference would tend to be more aware of their erotic natures and thus more likely to be able to cum.

However as gays increasingly are less special this increasingly would go away.
 
Dragonfly said:
Let me take some heat off of you.

There's a few obvious root causes for the quoted part above.

To start, religion . I doubt anyone can seriously deny that.

But on a more individual level, the root cause for women not having orgasms falls squarely on their shoulders.
It's all about communication. A woman knows what gets her off (unless the religion thing has gotten in the way).
It's up to her to work with her partner. To teach him. To educate him on her needs and desires.
Guys don't know this stuff from birth. Women are complex. Guys are easy.

If your guy isn't "performing adequately" I'm betting the line of communication isn't as open as it should be.

Now I know there are some guys who just don't give a damn about anyone other than themself, but most guys WANT to be thought of as great lovers.


Ladies, teach your man to be a great lover. That means YOU (ladies) have to communicate what it is YOU need/want.
You pobably don't want to come out and bluntly say "you're doing it all wrong", but if you want to be happy, you're going to have to figure out how to talk to your man about improving the sex. Something as simple as, "Hey, lets try something different this time."

I'm guessing lesbians are more open to communication with each other.
Not shocking since they're more than likely not hung-up on religious issues.

So in a nut shell here ya go:

Ladies, know what pops your cork. (god won't send you to hell for knowing your own body)
Then, teach your man how to do it.
Click to expand...

I don't think that we socially prepare women to provide constructive sexual criticism to their male partners, or for male partners to be receptive to sexual criticism.
 
lefty louie said:
Fact is, homosexuals get aids more so then heterosexuals, I'll stick with banging straight women, thank you.
Click to expand...

So what? That's utterly irrelevant to what I stated. And, in the rest of the world, far more heteros than homos get AIDS.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
So what? That's utterly irrelevant to what I stated. And, in the rest of the world, far more heteros than homos get AIDS.
Click to expand...

How is it irrelevant? We've established that those in this survey have sex, so abstaining from sex is not an option. While more heteros gave aids then homos, if you factor in the ratios of population you find that more homos get aids then heteros, so by me continuing to have sex with straight women (I'm a man) my odds are better of staying aids free then homos.

Look it up, it ain't hard to find.
 
lefty louie said:
How is it irrelevant? We've established that those in this survey have sex, so abstaining from sex is not an option. While more heteros gave aids then homos, if you factor in the ratios of population you find that more homos get aids then heteros, so by me continuing to have sex with straight women (I'm a man) my odds are better of staying aids free then homos.

Look it up, it ain't hard to find.
Click to expand...

What I meant was that your stated preference is irrelevant to what I posted.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
What I meant was that your stated preference is irrelevant to what I posted.
Click to expand...

I thought I'd put it out there so no body made an inappropriate offer, I'm damned sexy! LOL
 
lefty louie said:
Fact is, homosexuals get aids more so then heterosexuals, I'll stick with banging straight women, thank you.
Click to expand...

The takeaway here is that HIV transmission rates are the only thing keeping lefty louie here from signing up for the other team?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom