- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 94,153
- Reaction score
- 69,380
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
If you could separate all men, from all women, and put them on equally stable and resourced planets, which planet would be the safest to live on?
To first order, they'd likely be the same. While it may be true that historically, males have taken up the dominate role, it's not to say that if things were reversed they would be any different. Humans are violent, jealous, greedy creatures. That's across the board.
You can say "who's more nurturing?", but that's only in the historical context of our societies where men had been dominate. They were the hunter/gathers and the women staid and tended the home sort of thing. But again, had this historic trend had been reversed, who is to say that we wouldn't perceive men as the nurturers? Is there anything innate in the male that makes them incompatible with being the nurturer? Or is it historic context and societal construct through which we view the capabilities of the sexes?