Do you believe that our society is facing masculinity crisis due to overload of porn and video game content? Instead of communicating with people and learning how to live a real life many young people isolate themselves in their rooms. Playing games while chatting with your friends may seem like a nice substitute to the real life communication, but it's a completely different thing. Maybe that's why there are so many feminists out where because they can't find men capable to raise their potential children?
There is a research conducted by a leading Stanford psychologist who shares that point of view.
Porn and video game addiction leading to 'masculinity crisis', says Stanford psychologist - Science - News - The Independent
Is there any possible way to reverse the trend? I don't want to live in an effeminate society where gender roles are completely wrecked.
hmm...
He said: "Our focus is on young men who play video games to excess, and do it in social isolation - they are alone in their room."
No one from the cast of The Big Bang Theory would relaly count, here, because they often aren't alone.
Alone is the difference, here. A lot of 'nerdy' people I know are NOT loners - they don't like being alone. They hang out with each other / go to parties (like gamer parties where they play D&D together ). My time with such friends was me being at my most outgoing in life.
Zimbardo gave a TED talk in 2011 outlining the problems facing young men's social development and academic achievement, which he puts down to excessive use of porn, video games and the internet.
This is social-issue related. This is stuff like isolation, depression, etc. Instead of being with friends they're alone. Instead of being with a girlfriend they're getting off to porn. I just don't get his 'masculinity point' and how it relates. None of this is 'masculinity related'. *shrug*
Now oddly - in another article that we went over in depth maybe two years ago (general - here at the forum reference here) they talked about the sissification of males and that one author (I remember quite clearly) cited that the expectation to sit still and study things like science and history in a structured environment was harmful.
These guys that think we're having issues with sissification and masculinity and stuff - they need to decide what that even MEANS and come to a consensus among their selves because they're contradicting their own arguments left and right.
There is no crisis of masculinity. There is only a lack of societal acceptance for people who view masculinity as the ability and willingness to punch people who are smaller than you. This evolution of society is centuries in the making and has nothing to do with video games.
I agree.
I always imagined, up until I was in my mid-20's, that guys who want to do nothing but watch porn and hang out with their 'bros' were being masculine through and through. Maybe fling some wrenches in the garage . . . and do this day I don't fully grasp what masculinity is supposed to be.
I know what it is in fiction romance. I know what it is in erotica. But in real life - it's a vague, empty word that means nothing.
You know - like this guy:
Giving an example of the mindset of a gaming and pornography-addicted young man, he says: "When I'm in class, I'll wish I was playing World of Warcraft. When I'm with a girl, I'll wish I was watching pornography, because I'll never get rejected."
Yeah - that to me is what I imagined guys were always like - and that, to me, was the summary of 'masculine'.
But - really what suprises me here is that he's doing a study of TEENAGERS. What's normal for a teen boy anyway? They reference 'young men' but they only refer directly to a boy that was clearly still IN SCHOOL and A MOTHER who had a 'young man' for a sound. So . . . what age group are they studying? What's normal for a young man or boy who is HEALTHY in this regard?
I don't think this study he's done has shown anything of concern - boys are boys and they like sex (well - getting off - nevermind SEX) and it always has and always will dominate their mind. Nothing is new. He states that access to porn is new - but it's not. Porn's been around for centuries. Visual, written, etc. Fascination with sex toys and having sex with people in a harem so you don't have to build a relationship has been around just as long.
So he's concerned about the
medium - if porn was in picture books circa 1880
Astrid Cane then he wouldn't be as concerned?