• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Universal BG Check Could Have Saved Lives

I'm sorry that you don't understand. I'll try to explain again.

The 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

AK-47s are arms.

Therefore, the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear AK-47s (because they are arms).

It's not really complicated.

No it is not that complicated. But it is false on its face. And it is false in historical examples. And it is false in examine the words of the Second Amendment.

You have repeated the same false syllogism now at least 20 times. Although truthfully it seems like over 100 times. Why do you do so?
 
Universal BG Check Could Have Saved Us From Trump.

Why didn't we check to see if he's a gangster or not?
 
No it is not that complicated. But it is false on its face. And it is false in historical examples. And it is false in examine the words of the Second Amendment.

You have repeated the same false syllogism now at least 20 times. Although truthfully it seems like over 100 times. Why do you do so?

Which do you claim is false? That the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, or that AK-47s are arms?
 
You have repeated the same false syllogism now at least 20 times. Although truthfully it seems like over 100 times. Why do you do so?

Repetition is the mother of pedagogy.

You're welcome.
 
Which do you claim is false? That the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, or that AK-47s are arms?

it is your THEREFORE which is what makes it a false syllogism as The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms and no specific arm itself.
 
it is your THEREFORE which is what makes it a false syllogism.

Okay, so you don't contest the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, or that AK-47s are arms?
 
Repetition is the mother of pedagogy.

You're welcome.

That is the most charitable assumption to make about your tactics.

There are others and they become more obvious as you raise your post count repeated the same refuted material.
 
Okay, so you don't contest the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, or that AK-47s are arms?

Have you not been reading my posts?

Are you that immune to any other thought other than your own false syllogism?
 
That is the most charitable assumption to make about your tactics.

There are others and they become more obvious as you raise your post count repeated the same refuted material.

Wow, it's all about me again. Cool. Very personal.
 
Have you not been reading my posts?

Are you that immune to any other thought other than your own false syllogism?

Okay, so we can educate you step by step.

Do you contest that the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms?
 
Wow, it's all about me again. Cool. Very personal.

Unfortunately, your repetitive tactics and immunity to reason or history or reality is what you have made it.
 
Okay, so we can educate you step by step.

Do you contest that the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms?

You don't like it when I draw the obvious conclusions about your tactics but yet you persist in them.

This has already been explained to you.
 
Unfortunately, your repetitive tactics and immunity to reason or history or reality is what you have made it.

Wow! Yet another post about me and not the topic we're discussing.
 
You don't like it when I draw the obvious conclusions about your tactics but yet you persist in them.

This has already been explained to you.

So I'm going to go out on a limb and say that we agree that the 2nd amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Let's say we agree on that point. If we don't, let me know.
 
You don't like it when I draw the obvious conclusions about your tactics but yet you persist in them.

This has already been explained to you.

So the 2nd amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear arms. AK-47s are arms. So....?
 
Universal BG Check Could Have Saved Us From Trump.

Why didn't we check to see if he's a gangster or not?

Nikolas Cruz was a known gangster. Police knew he was dangerous. There was even an armed police officer at the school at the time. And yet background checks did nothing to prevent the mass murder, so it is a bit presumptuous for democrats to claim background checks will stop mass murders. What would have saved lives in Sanford Florida would have been an armed teacher who knew how to use his gun.
 
That does not address my point. If guns do not lead to crimes why not reduce those restrictions

Exactly. Why not? The evidence all points to the fact that it makes sense.

The assault weapons ban restrictions were reduced in the 2000's. Crime went down

Restrictions on firearm ownership went down after the Heller decision made many restrictions unconstitutional. Crime went down

States began adopting shall carry laws.. allowing unrestricted concealed carry... crime went down.. or at least didn't go up.

Despite the protests of anti gunners like yourself.. that cried over and over that reducing gun restrictions..like the assault weapons ban.. was going to cause a wave of terror and destruction..... violent crimes went down or stayed at historic lows as did firearms accidents..

And that's the reality vegas…. that gun control... didn't work..and doesn't work.
 
Exactly. Why not? The evidence all points to the fact that it makes sense.

The assault weapons ban restrictions were reduced in the 2000's. Crime went down

Restrictions on firearm ownership went down after the Heller decision made many restrictions unconstitutional. Crime went down

States began adopting shall carry laws.. allowing unrestricted concealed carry... crime went down.. or at least didn't go up.

Despite the protests of anti gunners like yourself.. that cried over and over that reducing gun restrictions..like the assault weapons ban.. was going to cause a wave of terror and destruction..... violent crimes went down or stayed at historic lows as did firearms accidents..

And that's the reality vegas…. that gun control... didn't work..and doesn't work.

Lots and lots and lots of gun control has been added. Even trump added some.



You made my case
 
Lots and lots and lots of gun control has been added. Even trump added some.



You made my case

No..it hasn't. The fact remains that gun control efforts through the 2000's and beyond .. went DOWN.. The assault weapons ban in particular expired.. concealed carry permits skyrocketed..Obama let people carry guns in federal parks... States enacted open carry and unrestricted concealed carry... and what did violent crime do?

IT WENT DOWN during that time. That's just the facts Vegas.
 
No..it hasn't. The fact remains that gun control efforts through the 2000's and beyond .. went DOWN.. The assault weapons ban in particular expired.. concealed carry permits skyrocketed..Obama let people carry guns in federal parks... States enacted open carry and unrestricted concealed carry... and what did violent crime do?

IT WENT DOWN during that time. That's just the facts Vegas.

Then prove it.



Watch this folks. Lol
 
Then prove it.



Watch this folks. Lol

Sure.

Using the FBI numbers, the violent crime rate fell 49% between 1993 and 2017. Using the BJS data, the rate fell 74% during that span. (For both studies, 2017 is the most recent full year of data.)

5 facts about crime in the U.S. | Pew Research Center

The Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, commonly called the federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB and AWB 1994), was enacted in September 1994. The ban, including a ban on high-capacity magazines, became defunct (expired) in September 2004 per a 10-year sunset provision.

Please explain Vegas.. how.. if gun control works.. How is it possible.. when the largest gun control law placed on the US citizen.. that banned the sale of a whole host of assault weapons.. that banned high capacity magazine sales.. nationwide..

Why is it when the ban went off in 2004... violent crime continued its trend DOWNWARD!!!..

please explain why if gun control was so effective.. .why is it when the ban expired.. violent crime hasn't gone steadily UP since then...

Watch this folks lol.
 
Sure.



5 facts about crime in the U.S. | Pew Research Center



Please explain Vegas.. how.. if gun control works.. How is it possible.. when the largest gun control law placed on the US citizen.. that banned the sale of a whole host of assault weapons.. that banned high capacity magazine sales.. nationwide..

Why is it when the ban went off in 2004... violent crime continued its trend DOWNWARD!!!..

please explain why if gun control was so effective.. .why is it when the ban expired.. violent crime hasn't gone steadily UP since then...

Watch this folks lol.

Are you saying correlation equals causation?


If you are say that directly.



Because we have added tons and tons of gun control since then.
 
No..it hasn't. The fact remains that gun control efforts through the 2000's and beyond .. went DOWN.. The assault weapons ban in particular expired.. concealed carry permits skyrocketed..Obama let people carry guns in federal parks... States enacted open carry and unrestricted concealed carry... and what did violent crime do?

IT WENT DOWN during that time. That's just the facts Vegas.

Still waiting for that proof of the number of pro gun versus gun control policies.


Exact numbers please. Lol
 
Back
Top Bottom