• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stop the Slaughter of Our Children With These Weapons of War

CLAX1911 said:
Well I don't think it's sociopathy, I've been in arguments with a bunch of different people on a bunch of different topics. I think what it is, is trying to drown out those that cause doubt.

I think that they become rude and belligerent to the point where some instances that they're just screeching because your words plant the seeds of doubt.

It's why when you see these big protests and stuff big chant and blow whistles. They don't want to be polluted with the thought that they might be wrong.

These are the people that require the most patience because they know they are probably wrong. You don't put that kind of guard up if you are sure.

The truth is the mother of all hatred. The more I live the more true that statement is.
Click to expand...

God bless you.
 
Samwise said:
God bless you.
Click to expand...

That's nice of you, and God bless you too.

But I'm just a normal guy, my one quirk is I'd like to know what makes people tick. It used to get me into some sticky situations because sometimes finding out what makes people tick means you have to push buttons. But I'm a pretty smooth talker.
 
CLAX1911 said:
That's nice of you, and God bless you too.

But I'm just a normal guy, my one quirk is I'd like to know what makes people tick. It used to get me into some sticky situations because sometimes finding out what makes people tick means you have to push buttons. But I'm a pretty smooth talker.
Click to expand...

I'm a newcomer here, but I think you're a very good debater.
 
Samwise said:
You are a better person than I am. I hate their sociopathy.
Click to expand...

And no it's not that people are better or worse it's just that some are entertained by watching a movie and other people are entertained by watching the people watch the movie. I'm the ladder.
 
Samwise said:
I'm a newcomer here, but I think you're a very good debater.
Click to expand...

Well thanks that's good to hear. You probably will change your mind if you ever find yourself across the table from me, but if you do just know none of this is personal. That and I like to push buttons.

Lol
 
CLAX1911 said:
If you know I'm wrong then there is no point in talking to me any further.

If you want me to bow before you entitle you champion of the debate, because you proved whatever the hell you think you proved, I'm sorry you failed to convince me.

you can think I'm pigheaded and at which point should probably stop talking to me because it's going to get you nowhere and it's not going to convince me.

But you continue to talk to me, and it's because of that I wonder if it's me you're trying to convince or you.
Click to expand...


Correct
 
jet57 said:
Right, so other than that, when a guy modifies his AR15, he has in effect - an M16 doesn't he stick. The AR15 IS as an assault weapon: that's what it was made for and then rejected for the M16.
Click to expand...

complete nonsense. an assault weapon in terms of military use is one that is select fire. The AR 15 is not a select fire weapon and thus the bannerrhoid movement DELIBERATELY lies when it calls AR 15s "assault weapons"/. They do that to imply=to low wattage sheeple-that such weapons are designed for CRIMINAL ASSAULT.

Just another example of why the gun control movement is the most dishonest in the USA
 
RF667799 said:
And if you would modify your M1 carbine, you would in effect have an M2 carbine.

What is your point anyway? The old "weapon of war" bleating nonsense?
Click to expand...

He cannot buy or own an AR 15 and he doesn't want you to be able to own or buy one either
 
jet57 said:
Ya' can't hack challenges can you.



https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

See how easy it is to prove you absolutely wrong?

You don't know what you're talking about dude. Get about 10,000 more posts under your belt. Learn who you're dealing with and then get back to me.
Click to expand...

Jet constantly misrepresents what Scalia was saying in the Pre-Incorporation period of the Second Amendment concerning state powers
 
TurtleDude said:
complete nonsense. an assault weapon in terms of military use is one that is select fire. The AR 15 is not a select fire weapon and thus the bannerrhoid movement DELIBERATELY lies when it calls AR 15s "assault weapons"/. They do that to imply=to low wattage sheeple-that such weapons are designed for CRIMINAL ASSAULT.

Just another example of why the gun control movement is the most dishonest in the USA
Click to expand...

How would you define "assault style weapons" for a national ban ?


I strongly suggest you would and couldn't...yet you call others "dishonest"
 
Rich2018 said:
How would you define "assault style weapons" for a national ban ?


I strongly suggest you would and couldn't...yet you call others "dishonest"
Click to expand...

there are no weapons currently being sold to private citizen, that have been made in the last thirty years, that have any relevance to the term "assault"
 
CLAX1911 said:
So you keep responding to me so you clearly don't think that I'm wrong you just trying to convince yourself.
Click to expand...

Well, you keep babbling even after I've provided multiple proofs that you don't know what you're talking about stick. You should study those proofs.
 
jet57 said:
Well, you keep babbling even after I've provided multiple proofs that you don't know what you're talking about stick. You should study those proofs.
Click to expand...

your comments in my signature prove it is you who hasn't a clue what you are talking about.
 
Rich2018 said:
Not assault rifles, assault "style weapons".
Click to expand...

A worthless and dishonest term that is idiotic because the one feature that makes a rifle useful for assault is not the stock, not the magazine, not the inclusion or exclusion of a pistol grip but rather a select fire switch.
 
TurtleDude said:
A worthless and dishonest term that is idiotic because the one feature that makes a rifle useful for assault is not the stock, not the magazine, not the inclusion or exclusion of a pistol grip but rather a select fire switch.
Click to expand...

Just as worthy as "assault rifle" or "battle rifle"


Actually until 1985, the British army had semi-automatic rifles only and still practiced "the assault"

Modern military thinking is slowly ditching auto guns like the Minimi (M-249) and replacing them with full power semi-auto rifles or with a three round burst.
 
jet57 said:
Well, you keep babbling even after I've provided multiple proofs that you don't know what you're talking about stick. You should study those proofs.
Click to expand...

You keep responding even though you have said you provided many proofs of blah blah blah. You aren't convincing me your proofs are not proof enough for me, and if you disagree write me off as a rational but the continue running your mouth thinking of you somehow going to submit to you only served one purpose and that's to convince yourself.

So I think your so-called proofs of blah blah blah. What really proves and you know it. If you don't say it enough maybe you'll convince yourself.
 
TurtleDude said:
your comments in my signature prove it is you who hasn't a clue what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

There seems to be a problem with me continuing to argue. If I thought I was right about something like saying the world being round, and somebody was insistent that it wasn't I just wouldn't talk to them anymore. They can't be convinced by what I provided so there is no use in continuing.

I think people do this for one of two reasons. they either desperately want to be right and they aren't that they are, are there trying to convince themselves that they are
 
Rich2018 said:
Not assault rifles, assault "style weapons".
Click to expand...
What style means in this context is a distinctive appearance. So you are admitting that they're different because they look scawy?

So when I mock You by calling and scary scary bang bangs I'm not really mocking you that's what you think they are.

I must admit I appreciate your honesty
 
Rich2018 said:
Just as worthy as "assault rifle" or "battle rifle"


Actually until 1985, the British army had semi-automatic rifles only and still practiced "the assault"

Modern military thinking is slowly ditching auto guns like the Minimi (M-249) and replacing them with full power semi-auto rifles or with a three round burst.
Click to expand...

Your obfuscating colloquial terms with legally defined ones for the purpose of potato.
 
CLAX1911 said:
What style means in this context is a distinctive appearance. So you are admitting that they're different because they look scawy?

So when I mock You by calling and scary scary bang bangs I'm not really mocking you that's what you think they are.

I must admit I appreciate your honesty
Click to expand...


Yes, those favoring a ban on "assault style" weapons will look at features like:

Self loading (as opposed to manually cocking)
Pistol grip (including a forward pistol grip)
Detachable magazine
Bayonet lug
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom