- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
- Messages
- 3,955
- Reaction score
- 889
- Location
- North East USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
I was against the idea before the hearings, and I'm still against it.
I get angry even thinking about it.

I was against the idea before the hearings, and I'm still against it.
Ta-Nehisi Coates made some good points that address some of the concerns mentioned here:
Here’s What Ta-Nehisi Coates Told Congress About Reparations - The New York Times
It infuriates me that anyone takes that idiot seriously. In his book Between the World and Me he complained that he was afraid growing up in his black neighborhood, and he resented whites for living in safe neighborhoods. Well, guess what? It was not white racists who endangered him in his black neighborhood. It was other blacks.
Some who testified before congress in this meeting called white people "ignorant" on the issue. As someone well informed on the issue, I can say that the democrats are the ignorant side in terms of history.
After the Civil War they were promised 40acres and a mule.I think section 8 housing and an Obama phone have been more than enough.
It entirely explains the problem they wish to address by claiming reparations are due. They claim that the reason black people struggle in modern society is because of slavery, which causes them to have all of their children out of wedlock, or something.
Ta-Nehisi Coates made some good points that address some of the concerns mentioned here:
Here’s What Ta-Nehisi Coates Told Congress About Reparations - The New York Times
There seems to be an element to the discussion that bypasses out of wedlock births, meaning single parent homes. Why is that I wonder?
Not sure what you refer to. If you mean that slavery is what lead to the disintegration of the black family, it's not true. The black family and black community was quite healthy right up until the 60s. Most black children were in two parent households from reconstruction until the War on Poverty.
If LBJ weren't so intent on "helping" blacks by buying their votes they'd be much better off now. If reparations are due for that then Democrats should be the ones to pay it.
Not sure what you refer to. If you mean that slavery is what lead to the disintegration of the black family, it's not true. The black family and black community was quite healthy right up until the 60s. Most black children were in two parent households from reconstruction until the War on Poverty.
If LBJ weren't so intent on "helping" blacks by buying their votes they'd be much better off now. If reparations are due for that then Democrats should be the ones to pay it.
lol...you do realize you elected a man with five children by three different women president. Right?
And he supported all of them. Looks like they function all right. I don't think any of them was ever on welfare or placed in foster homes.
lol...White Privilege. If Trump was poor and black, instead of born rich, he'd be in jail.
You just made the case for reparations. :lamo
TDS is really stupid but reparations is even worse. Your racist assumptions about Trump are really silly, BTW
lol...White Privilege. If Trump was poor and black, instead of born rich, he'd be in jail.
You just made the case for reparations. :lamo
The man was handed $200 million dollars by daddy, who also bailed him out of several bad investments on top of that. He also bought his way out of several felonies, not even counting the crap we don't know about.
White privilege.
I see very little public support for this measure, yet every few years it crops up.
Not sure what you refer to. If you mean that slavery is what lead to the disintegration of the black family, it's not true. The black family and black community was quite healthy right up until the 60s. Most black children were in two parent households from reconstruction until the War on Poverty.
If LBJ weren't so intent on "helping" blacks by buying their votes they'd be much better off now. If reparations are due for that then Democrats should be the ones to pay it.
Now that congress has held the hearings, what do you think?
The man was handed $200 million dollars by daddy, who also bailed him out of several bad investments on top of that. He also bought his way out of several felonies, not even counting the crap we don't know about.
White privilege.
Now that congress has held the hearings, what do you think?
Let the Democrat Presidential candidates fixate on this. I would enjoy watching them trip over their shoe laces.
The Democrats have already paid some installments. It's called "walking around money". A convenient place to hand it out is at the entrance of polling locations.
~ The food stamp program has had work requirements since 1996, and 40 percent of food stamp recipients are white while 25 percent are black.
Gov Facts:
Blacks @ (13%) of a population of 300,000,000 people in U.S = 39,000,000 / 56.1 percent who live on 80 of their income from social security of 39,000,000 people = *24,960,000 people.
Whites @ (70%) of a population of 300,000,000 people in U.S. = 210,000,000 / 56 percent who live on 80 of their income from social security of 210,000,000 people = *117,600,000 people.
Hispanic @ (15%) of a population of 300,000,000 people in U.S. = 45,000,000 / 53 percent who live on 80 of their income from social security of 45,000,000 people = *23,850,000 people.
Result: *92,640,000* = MORE white people than black people live on 80 of their income from Public Services of various sorts
Result: *93,750,000* = MORE white people than Hispanic people live on 80 of their income from Public Services of various sorts
combined Hispanic and Blacks 48,810,000
Result: *68,790,000,* = MORE white people than black and Hispanic combined together, live on 80 of their income from Public Services of various sorts