• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White Privilege

but only Blacks live in the projects?
....

You're the one who made the association. Maybe you should be the one to explain it.
 
Translation: "When outright lying fails, try obtuse."

Nope, that's what you said, I missed it, because I didn't think EVEN you would try to make that retarded argument......I was wrong.
 
so now its racist to ask those that support a position to ACTUALLY support it, not be hypocrites

wow...what world do you live in

i bet you see bigots and racists hiding under your bed....hurry to your moms basement...your blankie is waiting there

What you are doing is trying to pretend that protestors don’t support addressing the issue of systemic racism. There is no evidence of that, at all.

But it is the trope that Fox (and AM right wing talk radio0 peddles today it’s old all white audience.

90% of the talk about monuments right now, is coming from, people like you.

Trump played to this long standing racist trope as a way to get youpast the fact that he admitted knowing that Russians paid bounties on the heads of US soldiers and did nothing about it.\\

Not that you actually care about addressing racism,or whether your fuhrer is that faithless and negligent.

He played the bigotry card, and got you looking the other way.

Works on Trumpsters every time.
 
A black American would have to be either extraordinarily lucky, or extraordinarily well qualified to even get a callback for a six figure job. Given that black Americans are usually the last chosen to be hired, receiving fewer callbacks on average than white applicants, even with identical qualifications.

I'm sure you can cite this somewhere......
 
I'm sure you can cite this somewhere......

You should already know this...probably do and intentionally pretend it's in dispute.
 
LMAO wait, white privilege exists because the people who interview you are white? What the actual ****? That's flat out retarded,

It's not retarded. Research like this is so common it's not even newsworthy any more. Here's one example:

Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews - Harvard Business School Working Knowledge

Minority job applicants are “whitening” their resumes by deleting references to their race with the hope of boosting their shot at jobs, and research shows the strategy is paying off.

In fact, companies are more than twice as likely to call minority applicants for interviews if they submit whitened resumes than candidates who reveal their race—and this discriminatory practice is just as strong for businesses that claim to value diversity as those that don’t.
 
Certainly. But you should really have known this already.

http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/facbios/file/Whitening MS R2 Accepted.pdf

It's not retarded. Research like this is so common it's not even newsworthy any more. Here's one example:

Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews - Harvard Business School Working Knowledge

The hoops they jump through in order to deny the obvious would infuriate if not for my firm belief that they truly are stupid.
 
It's not retarded. Research like this is so common it's not even newsworthy any more. Here's one example:

Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews - Harvard Business School Working Knowledge

Problem I have is, they are ASSUMING, race is the reason they weren't called back....that's an assumption based on the bias of the premise.....Unless they called each employer, and asked them, they don't know that...

Employers, well top employers, get thousand's of resumes for positions.....but we are to assume that one didnt' called back because of race? Maybe they filled the position on the 3rd resume?
 
You're the one who made the association. Maybe you should be the one to explain it.

you are the one that associated the projects with just blacks, not me

i just said you could give up your home so they could move out of "the projects"

my whole premise is that you all are ALL TALK and no action

havent seen one of the so called activists for this make a dedicated stand....and really give up anything for their position

when i start seeing that, i will start to look at white privilege differently
 
What you are doing is trying to pretend that protestors don’t support addressing the issue of systemic racism. There is no evidence of that, at all.

But it is the trope that Fox (and AM right wing talk radio0 peddles today it’s old all white audience.

90% of the talk about monuments right now, is coming from, people like you.

Trump played to this long standing racist trope as a way to get youpast the fact that he admitted knowing that Russians paid bounties on the heads of US soldiers and did nothing about it.\\

Not that you actually care about addressing racism,or whether your fuhrer is that faithless and negligent.

He played the bigotry card, and got you looking the other way.

Works on Trumpsters every time.

nice try at deflection and changing the subject....maybe start a thread on that....

can you address the question at hand or not

i am guessing NOT.....most of you are running from my premise that you are ALL hypocrites
 
White privilege (or white skin privilege) is the societal privilege that benefits white people over non-white people in some societies, particularly if they are otherwise under the same social, political, or economic circumstances. With roots in European colonialism,[1] the Atlantic slave trade, and the growth of the Second British Empire after 1783, white privilege has developed[2] in circumstances that have broadly sought to protect white racial privileges,[3] various national citizenships and other rights or special benefits.[4][5]

In the study of white privilege, and its broader field of whiteness studies, academic perspectives such as critical race theory use the concept to analyze how racism and racialized societies affect the lives of white or white-skinned people. For example, Peggy McIntosh describes the advantages that whites in Western societies enjoy and non-whites do not experience, as "an invisible package of unearned assets".[6] White privilege denotes both obvious and less obvious passive advantages that white people may not recognize they have, which distinguishes it from overt bias or prejudice. These include cultural affirmations of one's own worth; presumed greater social status; and freedom to move, buy, work, play, and speak freely. The effects can be seen in professional, educational, and personal contexts. The concept of white privilege also implies the right to assume the universality of one's own experiences, marking others as different or exceptional while perceiving oneself as normal.[7][8]

White privilege - Wikipedia

So how many of our posters suffer from this devastating and debilitating issue? Do you feel the angst? The guilt? Are you fighting for the rights of the non-privileged?

I may have your answers.....

Do you?
You have so much guilt you needed a thread to get it out of your system?

Personally, I feel no guilt for being white. And I do want the non whites to be treated as all the whites of the nation get treated.
But the white nation isn't there yet. It's getting better.
 
Do you?
You have so much guilt you needed a thread to get it out of your system?

Personally, I feel no guilt for being white. And I do want the non whites to be treated as all the whites of the nation get treated.
But the white nation isn't there yet. It's getting better.

read on my man

the premise is in the thread....
 
great.....we have a winner here

let me help you...and all the white liberal/progressives who suffer the same fate

you say you have white privilege....

so lets get rid of it for you...all of it

tomorrow i want you to quit your job, and have your boss offer it to a person of color whether they have the necessary skills or not. Your car....i want you to donate it to the nearest shelter... but is has to cater to black families. Any money in banks, markets, investments....same thing...they need to be cashed in and sent to charities for black causes.

Then i want you to give your house and personal belongings away....thats it....give it ALL AWAY....take all that guilt and give it to someone else. By the end of tomorrow, you should be homeless and broke....and you can assuage your guilt. And then you can find other liberals/progressives who suffer the same guilt ridden fate, and help them do the same. I am sure you have a bunch of friends you can help find their way also.....

I figure it will take a week, maybe two...and all that guilt will magically disappear....you can earn it back (remember you are white, and have the privilege)

You can thank me later.....

Bravo!!!! Well said. Bet you won't get any takers though! They all want to keep what they got----they want us to give it all up!
 
Problem I have is, they are ASSUMING, race is the reason they weren't called back....that's an assumption based on the bias of the premise.....Unless they called each employer, and asked them, they don't know that...

No, they're not assuming anything. What they've noted is when applicants scrub their resumes of information identifying themselves as a minority, they get more call backs, with otherwise identical qualifications.

And it's actually not how bias works to call the screener and ask them. Do you expect the person in charge of follow up interviews to say, "I don't like blacks, so I remove them from the pool!" Of course not - they're asked to make judgment calls on resumes and likely for unconscious reasons, favor white people. That's what "white privilege" is in a nutshell. It's doubtful the person making these calls is what we'd call a 'racist' or is aware they're doing it.

Employers, well top employers, get thousand's of resumes for positions.....but we are to assume that one didnt' called back because of race? Maybe they filled the position on the 3rd resume?

OK, so you didn't read the story or any other similar studies.... :roll:

What's instructive is you call the idea that being white helps people in the jobs market "retarded" then dismiss with a hand wave the evidence proving you wrong, without apparently even reading the studies. You can remain intentionally ignorant of the evidence if you want, but it doesn't change it, make it go away.
 
read on my man

the premise is in the thread....

nah but thx

Threads on white privilege are just about feeling guilty. I don't feel guilty.
 
Since it's clearly apparent that a few people who are committed to believing White Privilege exists, but won't watch this,

Joshua Feuerstein - OHHHHH! He destroys her! | Facebook

Here's a synopsis of it,

The guy asks the lady, is there white privilege, her reponse was it's all around, when he asks her what it is, she is absolutely stunned, and asks him how he can't see it, and he says it doesn't exist and asks her again what it is, and she says the ability to be free of the social-economic struggles that white's don't have.....to hug their sons without being emasculated...

Think about that, this lady believes that white people don't struggle, and that white people emasculate black men who show affection towards their son....

I mean....really? Watch the video....and please provide an better argument if there is one....
 
No, they're not assuming anything. What they've noted is when applicants scrub their resumes of information identifying themselves as a minority, they get more call backs, with otherwise identical qualifications.

And it's actually not how bias works to call the screener and ask them. Do you expect the person in charge of follow up interviews to say, "I don't like blacks, so I remove them from the pool!" Of course not - they're asked to make judgment calls on resumes and likely for unconscious reasons, favor white people. That's what "white privilege" is in a nutshell. It's doubtful the person making these calls is what we'd call a 'racist' or is aware they're doing it.



OK, so you didn't read the story or any other similar studies.... :roll:

What's instructive is you call the idea that being white helps people in the jobs market "retarded" then dismiss with a hand wave the evidence proving you wrong, without apparently even reading the studies. You can remain intentionally ignorant of the evidence if you want, but it doesn't change it, make it go away.

No, I read the article about the study....and again.....can you just simply watch this video and provide a better argument for it?

Joshua Feuerstein - OHHHHH! He destroys her! | Facebook
 
Tell that to the pop stars with dark skin who cannot compete with their lighter skinned counter parts.
Why do light-skinned women dominate the pop charts? | Music | The Guardian

BTW: you're wrong about India. The darker the skin there, the less likely you are to be one of the elite. It's such a big deal, billion-dollar industries are devoted to lightening the skin of women.
Colorism in India: Light vs. Dark - Girl Spring

If you're going to challenge me. at least do your ****ing homework.

I know that there was always a caste system in India and the lower castes had darker skin. But it was not because of their skin color -- the darker race had been conquered by the lighter race.

You should have done your ****ing homework before being a self-righteous ****.

Skin color is not the cause of black poverty. If it were, other ethnic groups with dark skin would have the same problem in this country as blacks. They do not. Do your homework and explain why.
 
No. I know White Privilege is real. You are the one stuck, cuz.

So you were privileged, and you are white, so you extrapolate from that to the conclusion that all whites are privileged. Well if that isn't a bone-head way to "reason."
 
I prove it every single day. I am white. From being stopped by police without fear of being shot to interviewing for six-figure jobs with people who all look exactly like me, I have privileges that blacks could only dream about. Of course, I guess, if I was trying out for the NBA, that might not apply.

Hey--"We're all equal now." Amirite?

How often does it happen that a black person gets stopped by a cop for no reason and gets shot for no reason? Do your homework and look for evidence before spouting bull****.
 
I don't feel one iota of guilt for any privileges or advantages I've acquired. I do feel bad that I'm not financially secure for the rest of my life.

Equality does not mean "sameness". In an imperfect world, there will always be those less fortunate than others. That's a rule of nature, not man, and there's not much we can do about it since we're all responsible for our own existence, regardless of circumstances. We should try to enable and help each other more but that cannot be completely forced.
 
In sentencing, police policies, hiring practices with black sounding names, as well as how often you are to be wrongfully convicted. Your view is pretty much the default so i understand why rallies against police brutality are surprising.

Dark people from India and the Middle East have those problems? I think you read the opposite of what I said.
 
So you are saying black people can not interview for six figure jobs? Are you saying police only shoot black people?

He just spouts the progressive dogma of the moment. I am pretty sure he is a bot.
 
Back
Top Bottom