• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Must See Video: Mark Levin on the Impeachment

TrumpGurl

TrumpGurl

Banned
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
293
Reaction score
91
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Whether you like Mark Levin or not, I tell you now: If you do not listen to this video in its entirety then you are not aware of many facts surrounding this "impeachment". Levin weaves in history, the constitution, the intent of the founding fathers, and law throughout the current trial events.

YouTube

 
If you didn’t listen to Schiff’s entire presentation, without editing or interruption, you’re missing the facts.

Nobody should listen to Master Shake’s rants.
 
TrumpGurl said:
Whether you like Mark Levin or not, I tell you now: If you do not listen to this video in its entirety then you are not aware of many facts surrounding this "impeachment". Levin weaves in history, the constitution, the intent of the founding fathers, and law throughout the current trial events.

YouTube

Click to expand...

Levin weaves in history, the constitution, the intent of the founding fathers
Click to expand...

And book sales $$$$$$

Step right up folks

The Liberty Amendments - Wikipedia
 
Deuce said:
If you didn’t listen to Schiff’s entire presentation, without editing or interruption, you’re missing the facts........
Click to expand...

I actually did listen, and they were all demonstrable lies. Schiff proved himself to be a pathological and congenital liar, repeating lies that even Muller debunked.

Now its your turn to listen. Watch the video.
 
TrumpGurl said:
I actually did listen, and they were all demonstrable lies. Schiff proved himself to be a pathological and congenital liar, repeating lies that even Muller debunked.

Now its your turn to listen. Watch the video.
Click to expand...

You seem familiar?
 
Deuce said:
If you didn’t listen to Schiff’s entire presentation, without editing or interruption, you’re missing the facts. Nobody should listen to Master Shake’s rants.
Click to expand...
If you did listen to Schiff's entire presentation, you are still missing the facts, because he never tried to present any.

What he presented was innuendo, supported by hearsay and supposition. Almost none of what he brought forward would be admissible in an ordinary trial. The exceptions are the concessions. Trump has the facts in his favor and Schiff had to acknowledge some of them. Following the old saying, Schiff pounded the podium. This means he could not pound on either the law or the facts.

Levin makes a telling point. The Constitution framers intended removal of the President to be difficult. Hence the requirement of a super-majority. They also used the phrase, "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." These are presented as equally serious. Under no possible reading are the impeachment articles as serious as treason or bribery.
 
TrumpGurl said:
I actually did listen, and they were all demonstrable lies. Schiff proved himself to be a pathological and congenital liar, repeating lies that even Muller debunked.

Now its your turn to listen. Watch the video.
Click to expand...

No, you didn’t. You did not watch every hour of the Democrats’ presentation. Liar.
 
Jay59 said:
If you did listen to Schiff's entire presentation, you are still missing the facts, because he never tried to present any.

What he presented was innuendo, supported by hearsay and supposition. Almost none of what he brought forward would be admissible in an ordinary trial. The exceptions are the concessions. Trump has the facts in his favor and Schiff had to acknowledge some of them. Following the old saying, Schiff pounded the podium. This means he could not pound on either the law or the facts.

Levin makes a telling point. The Constitution framers intended removal of the President to be difficult. Hence the requirement of a super-majority. They also used the phrase, "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." These are presented as equally serious. Under no possible reading are the impeachment articles as serious as treason or bribery.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to suggest that the founding fathers didn’t think abuse of power was serious? :lamo
 
TrumpGurl said:
I actually did listen, and they were all demonstrable lies. Schiff proved himself to be a pathological and congenital liar, repeating lies that even Muller debunked.

Now its your turn to listen. Watch the video.
Click to expand...

"You're going back to work!". Guess who bellowed that, and at whom. Guess what happened next (while we're on the subject of pathological and congenital liars)?
Has Mexico's cheque arrived yet? Did you enjoy your 10% tax cut? Has ACA been replaced and repealed? Has the national deficit been 'eliminated' as promised, or has it grown by over $3 trillion?
Now, shall we discuss congenital and pathological liars some more?
 
Deuce said:
Are you trying to suggest that the founding fathers didn’t think abuse of power was serious? :lamo
Click to expand...

Every president ever has been accused of such. It is not a serious accusation because it can be too easily manipulated by the opposition as a reason to throw out a president. It is a nebulous term with no defined parameters. I can name scores of abuses by Obama.
 
TrumpGurl said:
Every president ever has been accused of such. It is not a serious accusation because it can be too easily manipulated by the opposition as a reason to throw out a president. It is a nebulous term with no defined parameters. I can name scores of abuses by Obama.
Click to expand...

Goalpost shift. Rejected.
 
snakestretcher said:
"You're going back to work!". Guess who bellowed that, and at whom. Guess what happened next (while we're on the subject of pathological and congenital liars)?
Has Mexico's cheque arrived yet? Did you enjoy your 10% tax cut? Has ACA been replaced and repealed? Has the national deficit been 'eliminated' as promised, or has it grown by over $3 trillion?
Now, shall we discuss congenital and pathological liars some more?
Click to expand...

I am not discussing anything with a hysterical socialist who cannot watch the video
 
Deuce said:
Goalpost shift. Rejected.
Click to expand...

You just lied through your teeth. I shifted nothing. I was responding to one isolated comment.

Now, did you watch the video?

Those who do not watch the video are purposely choosing to remain ignorant, and therefore are not worthy of any respect or response from me.
 
TrumpGurl said:
Whether you like Mark Levin or not, I tell you now: If you do not listen to this video in its entirety then you are not aware of many facts surrounding this "impeachment". Levin weaves in history, the constitution, the intent of the founding fathers, and law throughout the current trial events.

YouTube

Click to expand...


Your link doesn’t work. Did you watch the three days of opening arguments along with witness testimony by the House Managers?
 
Deuce said:
Are you trying to suggest that the founding fathers didn’t think abuse of power was serious? :lamo
Click to expand...
To quote you:

Deuce said:
Goalpost shift. Rejected.
Click to expand...
The founders debated at length about impeachment. They wanted very specifically to avoid this scenario, which devalues impeachment to a form of partisan censure.
 
Jay59 said:
To quote you:


The founders debated at length about impeachment. They wanted very specifically to avoid this scenario, which devalues impeachment to a form of partisan censure.
Click to expand...

Abuse of power is the impeachable offense. Devalued? Absurd.
 
TrumpGurl said:
Every president ever has been accused of such. It is not a serious accusation because it can be too easily manipulated by the opposition as a reason to throw out a president. It is a nebulous term with no defined parameters. I can name scores of abuses by Obama.
Click to expand...

Well that is a wholly false statement. You might be able to say that every president has been accused of doing **** the other side didn't like....but to claim that they all have been accused of abusing power is a tall tale of the tallest order.

You can name scores of things Obama did that you didn't like. I'm sure of it. You can't, however, name scores of actual abuses of power.
 
Jay59 said:
To quote you:


The founders debated at length about impeachment. They wanted very specifically to avoid this scenario, which devalues impeachment to a form of partisan censure.
Click to expand...

Only because one half of the oversight body refuses to actually do its job. That devalues it more than anything.
 
Deuce said:
Abuse of power is the impeachable offense. Devalued? Absurd.
Click to expand...
They cannot even prove abuse of office for even one specific occasion, yet they are treating it like a death penalty offense (treason). I would use the word ridiculous, but absurd works too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom