• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I'm Tired of Trump Supporters Being Labeled "cultists"

His consensual affairs are none of the public's business, just like Trump's arrangement/marriage with Melania is between only them. Clinton decided to testify and lied under oath. I thought he was smarter than to take the bait, but alas that is when it became the public's business.

...unless those affairs affect his abilities to serve in office....which they did.

2gr3su.jpg
 
Do you admit that conservative media does the same?

No, not to my recollection. There might be some, but not nearly like the lamestream DNC Pravda political propaganda media.

Haven't you been watching them cumming all over each other over Schiff's repetitive presentation in the Senate? It was Obama leg tingles all over again. Cultists? Yeah, pretty much.

Or are you one of the multitudes on both side that believe that only the other side does it?

To me it's more so a measure of to which extreme, and it's pretty clear that the lamestream media is very leftist extreme at this time, and has been for quite some time.

Further, its also apparent that the lamestream media has given up the honest reporting of politics in favor of becoming participants in politics, abandoning any remaining fragment of their journalistic integrity and standards they might have had, or imagined they had. Their plummeting credibility polling shows that, and also shows they aren't fooling anyone anymore, or at least not the observant and critically thinking.

Its possible that I didn't make clear that not all conservatives are in the Cult of Trump.

Fair enough, glad you are of that position, frankly there aren't enough which hold the same position. :thumbs:
 
They're angry so who knows what labels they will come up with next especially if Trump wins reelection.
Do you think they'll finally get next to themselves and realize that many who vote for Trump are also voting against them?

Perhaps, they will come up with some more creative doozies to spew at us.

Maybe after spending time in safe rooms, scream therapy etc. they may realize it... only time will tell.

Roseann:)
 
Hence why we think some of them are cultists.

The “we” you speak of can think what “they” want.... but that doesn’t mean what they are thinking is based on truth.

Roseann:)
 
The “we” you speak of can think what “they” want.... but that doesn’t mean what they are thinking is based on truth.

Roseann:)

The banter is started by Trump and some of his supporters get angry when we banter back.
 
Why did so many people not mind their own business concerning Bill Clinton "business"?

I don’t know I wasn’t one of them. Perhaps, for the same reason why so many today are in the Trump marriage business? Could it be their sense of their own moralistic superiority?

Roseann”)
 
No, honey, it it you abortionists that are dehumanizing the unborn by cavalierly casting them out. Not much quality of life for those clumps of cells you discard. That is sufficient negative effects. If you can't see that, you are a poor human. You are only worried about the woman and there is a lot more to it than that.

Your attempt to condescend to me failed; one reason for that is because you tried to use it to avoid actually answering my questions and making any kind of argument in return.

Care to try again or just accept your failure and that you are wrong? And since you did reduce the unborn to numbers, it is indeed you that dehumanized them.

So? Who says we needed all those people? Sure doesnt seem like it, we have plenty of people.

Are you just dehumanizing the unborn by reducing them to numbers? I was (and so were you) discussing quality of life.

I believe in quality of life over quantity.

Now...please list any negative effects on society?
 
I don’t know I wasn’t one of them. Perhaps, for the same reason why so many today are in the Trump marriage business? Could it be their sense of their own moralistic superiority?

Roseann”)

Or hypocrisy.

Remember when the Evangelicals gave Trump a few mulligans?
 
Or hypocrisy.

Remember when the Evangelicals gave Trump a few mulligans?

A few??? They completely ignored the fact Trump is the complete opposite of a decent Christian. He's unrepentant about violating most of the Ten Commandments and violates Christ's Two Commandments daily.

2grcsw.jpg
 
The banter is started by Trump and some of his supporters get angry when we banter back.

Perhaps, you haven’t noticed that long before Trump... political banter was used by many politicians. Trump was just better at bantering back at his political opposition.

Yes, there are some supporters that get angry but not all supporters. I don’t get angry, so banter away if you are so inclined.

Roseann:)
 
Or hypocrisy.

Remember when the Evangelicals gave Trump a few mulligans?

Are Evangelicals not allowed to give Trump a few mulligans for some reason and what is that reason?

Roseann:)
 
Perhaps, you haven’t noticed that long before Trump... political banter was used by many politicians. Trump was just better at bantering back at his political opposition.

Yes, there are some supporters that get angry but not all supporters. I don’t get angry, so banter away if you are so inclined.

Roseann:)

I know you don't get angry. The bantering has been done already since George Washington became our first president.

The fact that some of those people here on DP and elsewhere got so angry that it's unprecedented in history of America and that's what makes it interesting.

We have criticized our presidents plenty without being called name or accused of hating or being angry. But this time it's different. Why?
 
Are Evangelicals not allowed to give Trump a few mulligans for some reason and what is that reason?

Roseann:)

They are allowed to do so. We are allowed to call the hypocrisy on them.
 
Please provide the words that represent the letters. T.C.S. And T.A.K.

Roseann:)

The first one rhymes with Trump Sock Cucker and the second is Trump Ass Kisser. Just a little locker room talk to spice up the tired old Trump Dick Sucker and Trump's Deranged Sycophants.
 
I know you don't get angry. The bantering has been done already since George Washington became our first president.

The fact that some of those people here on DP and elsewhere got so angry that it's unprecedented in history of America and that's what makes it interesting.

We have criticized our presidents plenty without being called name or accused of hating or being angry. But this time it's different. Why?

Yes, in Our Country we have the freedom too criticize our presidents. Trump time is different.

A play where a Trump figure is stabbed to death like Caesar.

A singer thinking about blowing up the White House.

Actors wanting to punch Trump in the face.

A political opponent wanting to beat the hell out of Trump behind the gym.

That is not criticism. What would you call it and can you answer the why for all of the above real life episodes displayed in public..

Roseann:)
 
Yes, in Our Country we have the freedom too criticize our presidents. Trump time is different.

A play where a Trump figure is stabbed to death like Caesar.

A singer thinking about blowing up the White House.

Actors wanting to punch Trump in the face.

A political opponent wanting to beat the hell out of Trump behind the gym.

That is not criticism. What would you call it and can you answer the why for all of the above real life episodes displayed in public..

Roseann:)

Common for every president. Trump isn't any different.
 
Back
Top Bottom