- Joined
- Nov 16, 2017
- Messages
- 69,190
- Reaction score
- 63,893
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Actually it’s not rare for her. Perhaps, you just have not taken notice the multiple times she has.
Roseann
Thanks. :kissy:
Actually it’s not rare for her. Perhaps, you just have not taken notice the multiple times she has.
Roseann
How can I not vote for that rack?
His consensual affairs are none of the public's business, just like Trump's arrangement/marriage with Melania is between only them. Clinton decided to testify and lied under oath. I thought he was smarter than to take the bait, but alas that is when it became the public's business.
Do you admit that conservative media does the same?
Or are you one of the multitudes on both side that believe that only the other side does it?
Its possible that I didn't make clear that not all conservatives are in the Cult of Trump.
They're angry so who knows what labels they will come up with next especially if Trump wins reelection.
Do you think they'll finally get next to themselves and realize that many who vote for Trump are also voting against them?
Perhaps, they will come up with some more creative doozies to spew at us.
Hence why we think some of them are cultists.
The “we” you speak of can think what “they” want.... but that doesn’t mean what they are thinking is based on truth.
Roseann
Why did so many people not mind their own business concerning Bill Clinton "business"?
No, honey, it it you abortionists that are dehumanizing the unborn by cavalierly casting them out. Not much quality of life for those clumps of cells you discard. That is sufficient negative effects. If you can't see that, you are a poor human. You are only worried about the woman and there is a lot more to it than that.
So? Who says we needed all those people? Sure doesnt seem like it, we have plenty of people.
Are you just dehumanizing the unborn by reducing them to numbers? I was (and so were you) discussing quality of life.
I believe in quality of life over quantity.
Now...please list any negative effects on society?
I don’t know I wasn’t one of them. Perhaps, for the same reason why so many today are in the Trump marriage business? Could it be their sense of their own moralistic superiority?
Roseann”)
Like TDS?
nay, more creative than that...
Roseann
Or hypocrisy.
Remember when the Evangelicals gave Trump a few mulligans?
Nay, more creative than that...
Roseann
The banter is started by Trump and some of his supporters get angry when we banter back.
Or hypocrisy.
Remember when the Evangelicals gave Trump a few mulligans?
Perhaps, you haven’t noticed that long before Trump... political banter was used by many politicians. Trump was just better at bantering back at his political opposition.
Yes, there are some supporters that get angry but not all supporters. I don’t get angry, so banter away if you are so inclined.
Roseann
Are Evangelicals not allowed to give Trump a few mulligans for some reason and what is that reason?
Roseann
Maybe TCS or TAK?
Please provide the words that represent the letters. T.C.S. And T.A.K.
Roseann
They are allowed to do so. We are allowed to call the hypocrisy on them.
I know you don't get angry. The bantering has been done already since George Washington became our first president.
The fact that some of those people here on DP and elsewhere got so angry that it's unprecedented in history of America and that's what makes it interesting.
We have criticized our presidents plenty without being called name or accused of hating or being angry. But this time it's different. Why?
Yes, in Our Country we have the freedom too criticize our presidents. Trump time is different.
A play where a Trump figure is stabbed to death like Caesar.
A singer thinking about blowing up the White House.
Actors wanting to punch Trump in the face.
A political opponent wanting to beat the hell out of Trump behind the gym.
That is not criticism. What would you call it and can you answer the why for all of the above real life episodes displayed in public..
Roseann