• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The butt whacker turns out to be a youth minister and scout leader

Mashmont said:
That's a pretty twisted thing for you to say. No, 'baby' is a term of endearment. The women in house see it as just that. Lot's of people use that term. Men and women alike.
Click to expand...

Yes, we do...as a term of endearment. However, "baby" and "honey" and "darling" are also used to deliberately diminish someone, to patronize and put in place.

Mashmont said:
As for the man, you people continually lie about the act. He didn't grab a feel. There was nothing sexual about it. She wasn't hurt. He just made an unfortunate snap-decision. Nobody said it was acceptable, but it IS minor. The vast majority of Americans would agree with me that an apology is appropriate, then it should be dropped. It's just the far left loons that think he should lose everything he has over this.

Why do you people despise men this much? That's the question we should be asking.
Click to expand...

I don't despise men; I love them. And I have a son. I'm pretty sure he knows the difference between what you call your sweetie or a daughter and what you call a woman in a work environment. I'm not sure that you do.

I don't think Tommy Callaway should lose everything. I'm appalled by the "cancel culture" emerging in society. But this is the last month of 2019, and we've all known since at least the '80s' and the passage of workplace discrimination laws that "boys will be boys" no longer flies. Pretty sure that you too understand what inappropriate touching is and that you're just pretending here because this is grist for your little mill.
 
Mashmont said:
I generally believe an accomplished family man who gives his time to the community over a flighty girl with an agenda.
Click to expand...

Dennis Hastert was an accomplished family man, a leading conservative, and the head of the Republican Party in the House. And then the truth of who he really was came out.

This guy has now come out as the kind of man who would slap a woman he doesn’t even know. That a trustworthy kind of guy?
 
Rising Sun said:
The video shows where he is looking and she says where he hit her. Thank you for confirming he committed battery on this woman. Let's hope he gets the max at sentencing!
Click to expand...

All good fun. His only mistake was apologizing ... because if he hadn't tried to apologize he wouldn't have needed to make up a version of events that he could admit to and so he wouldn't have had to lie.

Evil reporter putting him on the spot and forcing him to think up a lie to cover his indisputable battery of her. It is her duty to forgive him now that he has gone to the trouble of admitting that he was the one who was caught on camera hitting her.
 
Mashmont said:
Trump a great Christian man, really. He's hitting the left right through their human shield. Calling their game out. That is God's work, plain and simple. For the left is opposed to God.
Click to expand...

So great Christian men personally attack children? God’s work is attacking children. Good to know. Your God is a monster.
 
Mashmont said:
Oh, so now he's gay. Never mind he's married with a family.

The crazy stuff you people cook up!
Click to expand...

So stupid.

Sexual assault is about power, not sex. Rapists are not horny, their abusive. It doesn't matter whom is the target, they like to abuse people to feel powerful.

Thus, he touches the boys. Not for sexual gratification, for power.

Why am I not surprised that you have no understanding of sexual offenses? You're completely clueless. And that's why you apologize for sexual assault.
 
ecofarm said:
So stupid.

Sexual assault is about power, not sex. Rapists are not horny, their abusive. It doesn't matter whom is the target, they like to abuse people to feel powerful.

Thus, he touches the boys. Not for sexual gratification, for power.

Why am I not surprised that you have no understanding of sexual offenses? You're completely clueless. And that's why you apologize for sexual assault.
Click to expand...

63 pages and still hasn’t said one word in favor of the idea that Men should not touch Women without their consent.
 
Questerr said:
I doubt this guy is an Incel. More likely an MRA, they want the same things.
Click to expand...

I doubt Tommy Callaway is an Incel or a Men's Rights Activist, although he may plead the latter in his court case. What I've been saying is that the Incels and, as you pointed out, the MRA's will definitely support his right to whack any woman's butt that he desired.
 
Amelia said:
All good fun. His only mistake was apologizing ... because if he hadn't tried to apologize he wouldn't have needed to make up a version of events that he could admit to and so he wouldn't have had to lie.

Evil reporter putting him on the spot and forcing him to think up a lie to cover his indisputable battery of her. It is her duty to forgive him now that he has gone to the trouble of admitting that he was the one who was caught on camera hitting her.
Click to expand...

True. OTOH, he clearly hit her which is assault. If the jury detects he's lying about where he hit her (even he confessed he didn't remember where he hit here) then I suspect his sentencing will lean towards the maximum. Nobody likes a liar.
 
Mashmont said:
He said he swatted her in the back, so it's not sexual battery.
Click to expand...

Correction....he THOUGHT he hit her in the back. She corrected his incorrect assumption. It doesn't matter what he thought he was doing, it only matters what he actually did. This isn't that hard.
 
bullseyelqcs said:
Correction....he THOUGHT he hit her in the back. She corrected his incorrect assumption. It doesn't matter what he thought he was doing, it only matters what he actually did. This isn't that hard.
Click to expand...

Either way, it's battery. He just confessed to assaulting a woman. This will not end well for Tommy.
 
Questerr said:
What exactly is your source for this claim that the vast majority of Americans agree with you?
Click to expand...

You don't want to see where they pulled that claim from.
 
Rising Sun said:
Unproved, but certainly something the parents of the Boy Scouts and both the boys and girls in his Christian Youth group will wonder about.
Click to expand...

So you think he just did this once?
 
Rising Sun said:
No. I think he's done similar inappropriate things before....just not on camera.
Click to expand...

Then you're too kind with reservations about his behavior among youths. Those are easy targets. They usually keep their mouth shut and they're easily dismissed.

It's not really in question.
 
ecofarm said:
Then you're too kind with reservations about his behavior among youths. Those are easy targets. They usually keep their mouth shut and they're easily dismissed.

It's not really in question.
Click to expand...

Please quote me where you think I was "too kind".
 
nota bene said:
I'm pretty sure he knows the difference between what you call your sweetie or a daughter and what you call a woman in a work environment. I'm not sure that you do.
Click to expand...

Why would you say that? I don't call women 'baby' other than my wife and daughters. Shouldn't you be addressing the person who said I call my daughters and wife in a sexual manner that because I think they're 'hot'? That's the guy that doesn't understand this. Funny how you always seem to scold the wrong person.
 
Questerr said:
63 pages and still hasn’t said one word in favor of the idea that Men should not touch Women without their consent.
Click to expand...

It's because I'm not playing your stupid-assed game.
 
Rising Sun said:
True. OTOH, he clearly hit her which is assault. If the jury detects he's lying about where he hit her (even he confessed he didn't remember where he hit here) then I suspect his sentencing will lean towards the maximum. Nobody likes a liar.
Click to expand...

It wasn't assault. There was no intent to harm. As for the location, there is plenty of doubt. He couldn't tell because of the long stiff raincoat. But it won't get to trial if the girl has the decency to let it go. As I said, is young and impressionable and has a lot of leftwing activist nuts in her ear, telling her she should destroy the guy, and promising her the moon if she does.

So it will come down to her upbringing. If she was brought up in a Christian home, she'll look for a positive solution that shows compassion. If she was brought up in a godless leftwing home, she'll likely cave to the radicals. We will see.
 
Rising Sun said:
Unproved, but certainly something the parents of the Boy Scouts and both the boys and girls in his Christian Youth group will wonder about.
Click to expand...

No, the cowardly Boy Scouts have already caved and relieved him of his position. We knew they would because their leadership is leftwing, and already caved to the LGBTs that demanded they re-instate gay leaders. The BSA obliged, and now they face multiple sex abuse lawsuits for their trouble. Recall also the cowardly Boy Scouts are now allowing girls in. How utterly absurd is that? Sounds to me like the Marxists are trying to destroy that formerly-noble organization from within. All icons of decency are targets now.
 
Mashmont said:
It's because I'm not playing your stupid-assed game.
Click to expand...

Being pro-consent is a “stupid-assed game”? Is it because not wanting men to touch women unless they have their consent is “Marxist”?
 
Questerr said:
Being pro-consent is a “stupid-assed game”? Is it because not wanting men to touch women unless they have their consent is “Marxist”?
Click to expand...

Isn't there anyone else you can annoy with your dopey game?
 
Mashmont said:
No, the cowardly Boy Scouts have already caved and relieved him of his position. We knew they would because their leadership is leftwing, and already caved to the LGBTs that demanded they re-instate gay leaders. The BSA obliged, and now they face multiple sex abuse lawsuits for their trouble. Recall also the cowardly Boy Scouts are now allowing girls in. How utterly absurd is that? Sounds to me like the Marxists are trying to destroy that formerly-noble organization from within. All icons of decency are targets now.
Click to expand...
Caved to the parents of the boys? No doubt....and also the right thing to do. Your rant about gays is interesting, but off-topic.

Who is "We"?
 
Mashmont said:
It wasn't assault. There was no intent to harm. As for the location, there is plenty of doubt. He couldn't tell because of the long stiff raincoat. But it won't get to trial if the girl has the decency to let it go. As I said, is young and impressionable and has a lot of leftwing activist nuts in her ear, telling her she should destroy the guy, and promising her the moon if she does.

So it will come down to her upbringing. If she was brought up in a Christian home, she'll look for a positive solution that shows compassion. If she was brought up in a godless leftwing home, she'll likely cave to the radicals. We will see.
Click to expand...

You should have read the statute. Regardless, the court will work it out. Again, I think Tommy will cop a plea because he knows he's guilty.

Anyone who has Christian compassion will seek to protect the woman from unprovoked attacks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom