• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another Fake Marxist Narrative that Women Don't Value Men Who Can Provide

I've seen you tuck tail at least twice when someone points out how ridiculous it is for you to conflate liberalism and communism. I would know, because it was me that did it both times. You live in a nightmare alternate reality where everyone to the left of the late John McCain are part of some kind of postmodern neo-Marxist conspiracy, and on some level you understand that your posts are nothing more than deranged rants.

Well said
 
I've seen you tuck tail at least twice when someone points out how ridiculous it is for you to conflate liberalism and communism. I would know, because it was me that did it both times. You live in a nightmare alternate reality where everyone to the left of the late John McCain are part of some kind of postmodern neo-Marxist conspiracy, and on some level you understand that your posts are nothing more than deranged rants.

I've never avoided a debate. Sometimes I ignore repetitive trolling questions or demands, however. What was your question again? You don't even remember. lol.
 
I've never avoided a debate. Sometimes I ignore repetitive trolling questions or demands, however. What was your question again? You don't even remember. lol.

By definition, when you refuse to provide valid data to support unproven positive claims, you ARE 'avoiding debate.' :screwy
 
I've never avoided a debate. Sometimes I ignore repetitive trolling questions or demands, however. What was your question again? You don't even remember. lol.

No question, just a statement of fact: you are laughably ignorant about Marxism, and you make this patently obvious when you run from thread to thread, screaming and crying Marxist about identity politics and "cultural" issues that have nothing to do with Marxism. It's frankly pathetic.

Hell, why not confront my central claim from page one, which you completely ignored: Marxism has nothing to do with liberal claims about human nature existing outside of material bases, because Marxism is a purely and utterly materialist philosophy. Claiming that sexual relationships have no basis in material needs is pure idealism, and is completely divorced from Marxist analysis. Here's a link, in case you "miss" my post again. https://www.debatepolitics.com/gene...ont-value-men-can-provide.html#post1070852697
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom