• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

McCabe Admits to DOJ Seditious Conspiracy

Tanngrisnir said:
That's not sedition.

Please learn words.
Click to expand...

The whole corrupt Obamanite justice department scenario can be rightly labeled as an attempted coup, which is exactly how Alan Dershowitz described it.
 
marke said:
The whole corrupt Obamanite justice department scenario can be rightly labeled as an attempted coup, which is exactly how Alan Dershowitz described it.
Click to expand...

And how Barr needs to start seriously looking into it....NO "SPECIAL COUNSEL"...just a STRAIGHT UP, LEGIT DOJ INVESTIGATION...starting with the Hillary NON-INVESTIGATION, and then LONDON, 2016....
 
Manc Skipper said:
Trump's in the frame, yes.
Click to expand...

It's true that McCabe and his crew were trying to interfere in the election. As is the MO of our spies, their premise was an illegal mistake, their plan was a joke and their attempt was unsuccessful.

After they failed to change the outcome of the election, they set about their coup attempt to unseat the duly elected POTUS.

Trump was in the picture only because he was the target of the traitors you support.
 
Grokmaster said:
Wrong as usual


Do I need to EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?


If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

For a seditious conspiracy charge to be effected, a crime need only be planned,
Click to expand...

Quite an over stretch used to defend Trump. Has anyone or anybody actually invoked the 25th amendment. Mcabe is gone.p

A discussion is a far cry from conspiracy, coup and or planning a crime. I believe this post is a follow the leader post. My leader Trump lies, misrepresents facts so that's what all Trump supporters need to do to defend Trump to the end.

Many non-Trump supporters want legal proof to rid this country of an incompetent leader. Other former supporters have seen enough lies, misleading, non-factual arguments, and his corrupt underlings to never vote for Trump again.
Yesterday's national emergency speech was proof enough of Trump's incompetence. Anyone that does not blindly follow him saw a man on camera making a complete fool of himself.

Maybe voters didn't fully know Trump during his campaign, but they know him now
Consequently, voters do not need Trump legal guilt to rid this country of him.
 
Sand Castle said:
Quite an over stretch used to defend Trump. Has anyone or anybody actually invoked the 25th amendment. Mcabe is gone.p

A discussion is a far cry from conspiracy, coup and or planning a crime. I believe this post is a follow the leader post. My leader Trump lies, misrepresents facts so that's what all Trump supporters need to do to defend Trump to the end.

Many non-Trump supporters want legal proof to rid this country of an incompetent leader. Other former supporters have seen enough lies, misleading, non-factual arguments, and his corrupt underlings to never vote for Trump again.
Yesterday's national emergency speech was proof enough of Trump's incompetence. Anyone that does not blindly follow him saw a man on camera making a complete fool of himself.

Maybe voters didn't fully know Trump during his campaign, but they know him now
Consequently, voters do not need Trump legal guilt to rid this country of him.
Click to expand...

That little sing-song rant of his about his emergency declaration being challenged in the courts was creepy. The people who can see and hear a speech like that and still faithfully follow Trump are just not thinking, in my opinion.
 
Grokmaster said:
Wrong as usual.


Do I need to EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?


If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

For a seditious conspiracy charge to be effected, a crime need only be planned,
Click to expand...

Golly Gee, so it turns out humans in government DO conspire to advance agenda?
 
trixare4kids said:
How can you be so clueless as to what constitutes treason?
(rhetorical question)
Click to expand...


Treason is defined in The Constitution, clueless one. You might trouble yourself to look it up. Only hair-on-fire Trumpkins are crying “treason” over the concerns members of the FBI considered bringing to members of the cabinet. Had those members not been slavish followers of the disloyal President, they might have concluded it wasn’t a waste of time and probably counter productive to go to them.
 
JackA said:
Treason is defined in The Constitution, clueless one. You might trouble yourself to look it up. Only hair-on-fire Trumpkins are crying “treason” over the concerns members of the FBI considered bringing to members of the cabinet. Had those members not been slavish followers of the disloyal President, they might have concluded it wasn’t a waste of time and probably counter productive to go to them.
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by SonOfDaedalus View Post
Trump is a traitor working for Russia. He was secretly negotiating a deal to build a tower in Moscow and maybe offer Putin a free penthouse. Trump is not acting in the best interests of the U.S. He's acting in his own financial best interest. How can you be so blind to that?
Click to expand...

Quote Originally Posted by trixare4kids View Post
How can you be so clueless as to what constitutes treason?
(rhetorical question)
Click to expand...

Sad that some here, including you, have no idea how to follow a series of posts in order to grasp context.
 
eohrnberger said:
It's one thing to discuss something, quite another to actually do something.

I've not been following that closely, but what steps to actually remove the sitting president on grounds of the 25th amendment were taken?
Click to expand...

So, if one plans with others to murder his wife, and then cannot pull it off, he is not guilty of conspiracy to commit murder?
 
Thoreau72 said:
Golly Gee, so it turns out humans in government DO conspire to advance agenda?
Click to expand...

And when the agenda is to unseat a duly elected President, they should be prosecuted for the seditious conspiracy of which they are guilty.
 
trixare4kids said:
Sad that some here, including you, have no idea how to follow a series of posts in order to grasp context.
Click to expand...

In a pinch resort to whatever line of retort you can think of no matter how lame.
 
marke said:
The whole corrupt Obamanite justice department scenario can be rightly labeled as an attempted coup, which is exactly how Alan Dershowitz described it.
Click to expand...

Alan Dersch literally just stated "Nothing the Obama DOJ did could ever be labeled as an attempted coup. Please quote me on this."
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No such conspiracy occurred. Discussing legal actions done under constitutional authority is not 'sedition'.

Please lean words.
Click to expand...

You’re right, this would actually be a coup and not sedition
 
Grokmaster said:
Wrong as usual.


Do I need to EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?


If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

For a seditious conspiracy charge to be effected, a crime need only be planned,
Click to expand...


That refers to an illegal method of overthrowing a government....the 25th amendment is a LEGAL way.

QED: It is not and cannot be sedition.
 
I love how Republicans are just unabashedly telling us they don't understand how the constitution works. I mean, you can almost make a case that things not in the constitution are illegal, say the war on drugs, of course it's more complicated than that but you can make a case. This is literally in the constitution. It's the 25th Amendment dumbasses. You guys remember amendments don't you? Hell some of you masturbate to the 2nd. Also it's a pretty ****ty coup when the result would be President Mike Pence.
 
Master Debator said:
I love how Republicans are just unabashedly telling us they don't understand how the constitution works. I mean, you can almost make a case that things not in the constitution are illegal, say the war on drugs, of course it's more complicated than that but you can make a case. This is literally in the constitution. It's the 25th Amendment dumbasses. You guys remember amendments don't you? Hell some of you masturbate to the 2nd.
Click to expand...



This.
 
eohrnberger said:
It's one thing to discuss something, quite another to actually do something.

I've not been following that closely, but what steps to actually remove the sitting president on grounds of the 25th amendment were taken?
Click to expand...

They talked about it. That was the only step taken because they lacked the balls to actually do anything else. Well, there were a few well-placed lies and leaks. Seems self-interest topped their self-characerized patriotism in the end. Fine group of people there. Truly fine. :roll:
 
humbolt said:
They talked about it. That was the only step taken because they lacked the balls to actually do anything else....
Click to expand...

So now it takes courage to follow an unprofitable course of action ?


I guess Trump must be a true hero then judging by the balance sheets of his businesses...
 
Rich2018 said:
So now it takes courage to follow an unprofitable course of action ?


I guess Trump must be a true hero then judging by the balance sheets of his businesses...
Click to expand...

Yeah... a 98% success rate, with hundreds of businesses....with a handful of companies that failed. TREMENDOUS SUCCESS.
 
Rich2018 said:
So now it takes courage to follow an unprofitable course of action ?


I guess Trump must be a true hero then judging by the balance sheets of his businesses...
Click to expand...

The conspiracy to commit SEDITION is OBVIOUS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom