• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Hillary Clinton a scumbag?

She's a scumbag for a lot of reasons...most importantly because she is a politically driven whore that spent 4+ decades enabling her predator husband and attacking his victims.

Of course...the people that supported her are douchebags that only care about partisan politics as well...so...she has lots of company
 
VanceMack said:
She's a scumbag for a lot of reasons...most importantly because she is a politically driven whore that spent 4+ decades enabling her predator husband and attacking his victims.

Of course...the people that supported her are douchebags that only care about partisan politics as well...so...she has lots of company
Click to expand...

Must really suck to need Hillary to kick and call a whore so as to relieve the pain of losing an election.
 
calamity said:
Must really suck to need Hillary to kick and call a whore so as to relieve the pain of losing an election.
Click to expand...
Which election did I lose?
 
Gaius46 said:
As a defense attorney she is obligated to provide her client with the best defense possible. That means trying her damnest to get scumbags off. She did her job.
In the audio it appears she's talking shop with another lawyer - I'd guess. She's laughing about aspects of the case and stupidities done by the crime lab and judge.
She didn't say anything about the victim that I heard.
Click to expand...



Waht about the war room? I put forth two pieces of evidence.
 
Redress said:
Why would any one answer a question based on a lie?
Click to expand...



There are two parts. if you disagree with the first part fine.


What about the war room where she went after her husbands rape victims. why wont any of you answer? hypocrites much?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Is Hillary Clinton a scumbag?


Here she is laughing and bragging how she got a pedophile rapist off:
Click to expand...

That's bull. I listened to the entire thing and nowhere did I hear her laughing about a pedophile rapist escaping judgement. She briefly chuckled at a couple aspects of the case, which is what people sometimes do when relating a story, even if it is overall somewhat sad. I will say she sounded smug near the end of the tape, however, you're reaching if you think this is an example of someone being a "scumbag." Also, wasn't H.C. assigned this case, for which from she requested removal but was denied?

You know, I don't like Hillary Clinton. I've never liked her smug attitude and believe it was her downfall. But she's gone, at least I hope. Can we not move past her?
 
Last edited:
Is there a respectful way of calling someone an idiot?

My candidate? What in this world would make you think I even remotely wanted him in office? Hilary Clinton is no random private citizen, she is the topic of this thread and her track record speaks for itself. Just look at the quotes attributed to her that go towards her husband. Back off, for you know not what it is you speak of.
 
Elroy Bean said:
That's bull. I listened to the entire thing and nowhere did I hear her laughing about a pedophile rapist escaping judgement. She briefly chuckled at a couple aspects of the case, which is what people sometimes do when relating a story, even if it is overall somewhat sad. I will say she sounded smug near the end of the tape, however, you're reaching if you think this is an example of someone being a "scumbag." Also, wasn't H.C. assigned this case, for which from she requested removal but was denied?

You know, I don't like Hillary Clinton. I've never liked her smug attitude and believe it was her downfall. But she's gone, at least I hope. Can we not move past her?
Click to expand...



Do you folks have some sort of issues where you cant read whole posts. there was the video, and there was the article on the war room.


my question goes to consistancy. Moore is a scumbag, is hillary for her actions, in her setting up of a war room to protect her rapist husband?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
You can post all the left wing "fact checking" that you want. I posted the actual audio to let the folks decide for themselves.


Lets pretend that you are correct though. there is still the other half, and you have failed to respond to the threads question.
Click to expand...

Yep! It's been over a year since Hillary lost the election, and she's shown precisely zero indication of ever running for office again...and yet you (and Fox News) still can't stop talking about her.

It's okay to ignore Trump repeatedly and publicly lying about his team's contacts and meetings with Kremlin-connected Russians before the election, and it's okay to ignore Trump's repeatedly and publicly taking the word of the ex-KGB colonel in charge of the Kremlin over that of our NSA, CIA, and FBI...

...but what about Hillary!!!! Don't look at what the sitting president is doing - look at the candidate who lost over a year ago!!!! Don't investigate Trump's ties with Russia, don't investigate his NSA pick's agency for Turkey (and additional ties to Russia), but INVESTIGATE HILLARY!!!!

I really do pity y'all - when Hillary passes away, there goes half of Fox News' programming. What will y'all do then?
 
Glen Contrarian said:
Yep! It's been over a year since Hillary lost the election, and she's shown precisely zero indication of ever running for office again...and yet you (and Fox News) still can't stop talking about her.

It's okay to ignore Trump repeatedly and publicly lying about his team's contacts and meetings with Kremlin-connected Russians before the election, and it's okay to ignore Trump's repeatedly and publicly taking the word of the ex-KGB colonel in charge of the Kremlin over that of our NSA, CIA, and FBI...

...but what about Hillary!!!! Don't look at what the sitting president is doing - look at the candidate who lost over a year ago!!!! Don't investigate Trump's ties with Russia, don't investigate his NSA pick's agency for Turkey (and additional ties to Russia), but INVESTIGATE HILLARY!!!!

I really do pity y'all - when Hillary passes away, there goes half of Fox News' programming. What will y'all do then?
Click to expand...





I am not talking about trump. you guys get all buthurt when she's brought up in a trump thread. don't be raging hypocrites, (on so many levels.).


she set up a war room to attack her husband's rape victims.


is she a scumbag or not?
 
shagg said:
I don't get it.... is she running for some office again? Or are you guys just that desperate for a distraction? Maybe this is some sort of grand scale whataboutism?


For what it's worth I really don't like her. But for someone who's politically irrelevant, I keep seeing her name a lot in headlines and thread titles. Is it simply that she represents Trumps most recent win?
Click to expand...

She's not running, but she puts herself in the spot light every week by running her pie hole to every media outlet that she get attention from. She's just about as much of a nut job as DT.

Whataboutism isn't exactly owned on here by conservatives either.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Is Hillary Clinton a scumbag?


Here she is laughing and bragging how she got a pedophile rapist off:




Here is the story about her setting up a "war room" to destroy the victims of her husband:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...ary_do _--_and_why_did_she_do_it_129787.html



So the question is simple. Is she an honorable person or a scumbag? once and for all.
Click to expand...


This is one of those 'Let's take things out of context and lie about it moments'. She was not laughing at getting a rapist off. She was saying that he passed a lie detector test, and she was laughing at the fact that made her not accept the results of lie detector tests since. Do you always like to misrepresent things?
 
calamity said:
:lamo
Click to expand...
I have to be honest with you. I pity you. I really do. You are so personally...vacuous...that you have to fabricate **** to have a 'win' in life. Its pathetic.

https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...17-w-254-a-post1067910957.html#post1067910957
https://www.debatepolitics.com/poll...te-alabama-post1067895017.html#post1067895017

Thats it. Thats all you will ever find. But you are so empty that you have to fabricate lies and stories. Somehow, that makes you feel...I dont know..better...about yourself?

Hillary Clinton is a political whore and a douchebag. Anyone that supported her is a douchebag. Where you go with that...its up to you.
 
RAMOSS said:
This is one of those 'Let's take things out of context and lie about it moments'. She was not laughing at getting a rapist off. She was saying that he passed a lie detector test, and she was laughing at the fact that made her not accept the results of lie detector tests since. Do you always like to misrepresent things?
Click to expand...




What about the war room set up to go after her husband's rape victims? I gave to examples of evidence.


Is she a scumbag or not?


Why wont any of you address the war room or answer the question?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
There are two parts. if you disagree with the first part fine.


What about the war room where she went after her husbands rape victims. why wont any of you answer? hypocrites much?
Click to expand...

Why should anyone debate you on the second part when you can't even bring yourself to admit that your first part was clearly bogus?

Anyways, from your second source :
Klayman: "One of the private detectives broke into her house and took an answering-machine tape ... to make sure there was no evidence of what had occurred. These were the kind of things that have been done. ... They would have the private detectives -- for instance, Kathleen Willey experienced this -- she was riding her bike one day and one of these private detectives, or one of his agents, rode up to her on another bike and mentioned the names of her children in a very sinister way. 'How are your children, Ms. Willey?' In fact, that happened to me during a deposition at Judicial Watch, where one of the lawyers that were representing the Clintons -- shortly after my daughter was born -- mentioned her name. And there was no way of knowing that. They wanted us to know that they were watching us ... that we were at risk."
Click to expand...

I mean, come on. Do people really think that Hillary Clinton had swarms of private investigators out threatening to hurt these women's children? Are you really suggesting that this all happened yet we have no evidence of anyone related to Clinton actually doing this or coming out to say they were paid to do it? It sounds like a bad mystery novel.

What is likely the truth is that Bill was accused, they hired lawyers and investigators to know where they stand legally and to see if the testimony of these women were able to be picked apart, which is all standard procedure. If Bill raped anyone and Hillary knew it or thought it was true but went out of her way to protect him then she's scum. But I have serious doubts about that. If all she did was hire lawyers and PI's to investigate the allegations because she didn't think Bill ever raped these women then that doesn't make her scum. It makes her human.
 
roughdraft274 said:
Why should anyone debate you on the second part when you can't even bring yourself to admit that your first part was clearly bogus?

Anyways, from your second source :


I mean, come on. Do people really think that Hillary Clinton had swarms of private investigators out threatening to hurt these women's children? Are you really suggesting that this all happened yet we have no evidence of anyone related to Clinton actually doing this or coming out to say they were paid to do it? It sounds like a bad mystery novel.

What is likely the truth is that Bill was accused, they hired lawyers and investigators to know where they stand legally and to see if the testimony of these women were able to be picked apart, which is all standard procedure. If Bill raped anyone and Hillary knew it or thought it was true but went out of her way to protect him then she's scum. But I have serious doubts about that. If all she did was hire lawyers and PI's to investigate the allegations because she didn't think Bill ever raped these women then that doesn't make her scum. It makes her human.
Click to expand...




Thank you for at least answering.


https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/yes-hillary-was-an-enabler-213919



It's clear that she chose to defend her husband at all costs, in fact calling the allegations once a "vast right wing conspiracy".


"According to journalist Michael Isikoff, the Clinton campaign in 1992 spent $100,000 on private-detective work related to women. The approach, when rumors first popped up, was to get affidavits from women denying affairs — the reflex of most women is to avoid exposure — and, failing that, to use any discrediting tool at hand."


How can you defend this?
 
RetiredUSN said:
She's not running, but she puts herself in the spot light every week by running her pie hole to every media outlet that she get attention from. She's just about as much of a nut job as DT.

Whataboutism isn't exactly owned on here by conservatives either.
Click to expand...

Good points.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Thank you for at least answering.


https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/yes-hillary-was-an-enabler-213919



It's clear that she chose to defend her husband at all costs, in fact calling the allegations once a "vast right wing conspiracy".


"According to journalist Michael Isikoff, the Clinton campaign in 1992 spent $100,000 on private-detective work related to women. The approach, when rumors first popped up, was to get affidavits from women denying affairs — the reflex of most women is to avoid exposure — and, failing that, to use any discrediting tool at hand."


How can you defend this?
Click to expand...

And once again you are unable to address how wrong you were on the first point. I'm not addressing anything else til you can be honest. Admit that your first point was bull**** and then we can continue on #2.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
I am not talking about trump. you guys get all buthurt when she's brought up in a trump thread. don't be raging hypocrites, (on so many levels.).


she set up a war room to attack her husband's rape victims.


is she a scumbag or not?
Click to expand...

Butbutbutbut...Hillary!!!!!!

I do sincerely pity you.
 
calamity said:
You do know this has been debunked over 2 years ago. Correct?
Click to expand...

That never stopped him before!

This is the dumbest thread of the day....congrats to the OP.
 
Is queen wannabe Hillary a scumbag ?
Yes.
Are Demos scumbags ?
Yep.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom